ekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 22 hours agoWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down115
arrow-up11.12Karrow-down1imageWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square71fedilink
minus-squarewill_a113@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35·21 hours agook, but what about three Youtube videos?
minus-squareMr Fish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·19 hours agoAs long as they’re shorts, only showing one vague, unverifiable, third or fourth hand anecdote each.
minus-squareRemember_the_tooth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·19 hours agoThat makes sense. I heard that my college roommate’s pen pal said something like that.
minus-squareRemember_the_tooth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·21 hours agoAre they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody, because if not, you can miss with that.
minus-squarewill_a113@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·20 hours ago Are they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody Is there any other kind?
minus-squareSlovene@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·20 hours agoMaybe, if they’re from potholer54
minus-squarePhoenixz@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·20 hours agoAll hail potholer54! The guy is awesome
ok, but what about three Youtube videos?
As long as they’re shorts, only showing one vague, unverifiable, third or fourth hand anecdote each.
That makes sense. I heard that my college roommate’s pen pal said something like that.
Are they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody, because if not, you can miss with that.
Is there any other kind?
Maybe, if they’re from potholer54
All hail potholer54! The guy is awesome