• HookedSiren@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      11 months ago

      How out of touch are you?

      1. nobody works there because it’s their life dream. If they work there it’s because of some benefit like having some money vs no money.

      2. who should be working there then? Like, someone has to. Who do you think belongs there?

      • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Personally, I don’t mind doing an reasonable amount of work - it can be cathartic like exercise or give a sense of purpose. The problem is, the employers want people to be like hamsters on a wheel, driven to exhaustion and then disposed of for the next rodent to be worked to death.

        Workers are being abused - ghost jobs, inconsiderate scheduling, impossible requirements, no overtime pay, manipulation, and so forth has corroded the social contract. At some point, there is just no point in working.

        I belong there, as would many other people, if society was willing to treat us fairly.

        • HookedSiren@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I agree. I wasn’t trying to shit on the job itself, but point out how fast food workers are treated. If fast food workers were treated like human beings, i bet people would love to work there.

      • ghterve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        No, nobody has to. The problem of them under paying would solve itself if nobody was willing to work for them at those low wages.

        • HookedSiren@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Maybe if we had UBI or something, which is why the powers that be are so against it, because being homeless and hungry are powerful motivators to put up with more bullshit.

        • trum_pam_pam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          43
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If I don’t do something, than fuck everyone who does it, let 'em burn. Definitely big brain time.

          • 3abas@lemm.ee
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The root cause of the problem IS the mega-corp fast food chain that sells us expensive shitty unhealthy food and pays slave wages to its labor force that it treats like annoying obstacles and constantly threatening to automate away. They take away jobs from real restaurants too, until they shut down, and all you have left is fucking McDonald’s.

            Dismissing that people work there out of desperation is out of touch, but to disagree with “let fastfood restaurants go bankrupt” is where the REAL BIG brains are at.

            Why can’t we just have a discussion without insults. These corporations are the problem, convincing them to pay you more until they automate you away is not a solution, the solution IS for them to be bankrupt.

            I also don’t eat there, and think it’s morally outrageous to give them any profit that helps them achieve the distopian future they’re working so hard towards.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Why can’t we just have a discussion without insults

              Let’s be honest, “I don’t eat fast food so they should be allowed to pay slave wages” isn’t really a compelling discussion with nuanced talking points.

              Why is it on the shoulders of the desperate to not take any job they can get, and on the shoulders of the desperate to not get whatever food they can afford and have time for in between their 3 jobs?
              You know what would also kill the business model of “under pay and over work staff for low quality results then just replace them”? Laws preventing such behavior.

              • 3abas@lemm.ee
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                But they didn’t say that, they said the opposite… They’re saying they’d rather not support this awful business, and would rather watch it die so it can be replaced with real jobs that people can live off of. That’s how I interpreted it anyway.

                • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  would rather watch it die so it can be replaced with real jobs that people can live off of

                  A faster way to do that: minimum wage laws that require people are paid a wage they can live off of.

                  The’ve tried the whole “let’s not pass laws to increase minimum wage, people will just not take jobs that don’t pay enough” for decades. Jobs still exist that pay below poverty (minimum wage).

                  If we agree that what they are doing is garbage and shouldn’t be able to exist, why are they arguing against doing something that would prevent it from existing?

            • dependencyinjection
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Brother if you’re ever in the UK I’d love to link up and see if you’re so quick to talk to people like shit IRL, cause you’ll quickly get your shit rocked.

              HMU if you ever in Manchester.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              You seem really offended at the idea that “someone who works a job should be able to afford living” for some reason…

                • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Fulltime employment is not consistently defined across the board. Both of you may be right depending on which country or state you live in. Generally, in the US, full time employment is considered 40hrs of work per week, and has nothing to do with hourly or salary pay.

            • chuymatt@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              You are wrong and have always been wrong. It is based on worked (scheduled hours) in a week. Above a threshold, and it is considered full-time.

        • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          11 months ago

          You sounds like you’ve never held a job before and these terms are brand new to you. You’re using them wrong.

            • Corn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 months ago

              Fulltime is typically defined as 40 hours a week max, but the threshold is lower for definitions like the ACA, you can be eligible as low as 30, and sometimes employers have to make you eligible as high as 36, it’s complicated.

              • Hawke@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s not really complicated, it’s just that companies want to find (or make!) loopholes to shirk their responsibilities.

        • Zetta@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m hourly and make a good living wage, are you implying that hourly means you don’t work full time or should be entitled to a livable wage?

            • Corn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              The workers who are responsible for the continued function of society aren’t owed anything?

                • Corn@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I’m not Jeff Bezos or Bill Gates, I’m not the one stealing their surplus value. I’d be happy to help them take back what they’re owed though.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Just go away. We don’t want you here.

      You’re either a troll or lack all empathy for others. Neither are anything to society.

    • peregrin5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’re right. I’ll quit my job tomorrow and apply to be the next Elon Musk. Give me 6 million in seed money now please.

            • peregrin5@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Lmao. Look at this poor mfer unable to afford giving me 6 million in seed money so I can quit my burger job and be the next Elon Musk. What a loser.

              Maybe he should quit his job and get a better paying one to afford my seed money, like normal people do.