• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think so, especially considering that we have 8 year olds on sex offender registries which is just retarded.

    The problem with rape is that many times its very hard to impossible to prove, especially when time has passed. Sometimes it’s possible with messages sent to and from, sometimes with a rape kit.

    But what if there was a rape without witnesses where she was so afraid that she didn’t move, and later je “simply” claims she was a consenting partner?

    What if she actually was a consenting partner and then retroactively claimed it was rape?

    Things get very muddy and dicey very quickly and we’re still living in a “innocent until proven guilty” society, thankfully, but it does make rape a very complicated subject

      • MachineFab812
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it really so hard for you to agree we should start with “not putting 8-year-olds on the sex offender registry”?

        • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t live in a country where something like that is a thing. We don’t have a register for any type of offense.

          But the person I asked wrote about rape in general. That’s why I asked. It wasn’t about a register for juvenile offenders.

          • MachineFab812
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The registry and minors being added to it is the topic of the OP and every comment that follows. Your supposed ignorance of the concept was exhausted as an excuse already.