But in my opinion, if itās a real human consciousness and itās the one itself that have total authorithy for their body, then I think itās human. Like cyborg.
Except when it is not entirely independent, like stalkers in Half-Life 2, theyāre under control of someone else. Or Half-Life headcrab zombies where itās under control of the headcrab, but the human is terribly miserable. I think killing the zombie would put that misery to end which helps the hijacked person.
If itās not a real consciousness but merely an LLM spit out of the personsā lifetime social media personality data, then itās a clanker.
I think this is kind of more realistic, social media corporation will launch a feature that āreviveā a dead person as a personality that people can interact with, but they will try to humanize it as much as possible in the marketing language, implying itās a real consciousness while in reality itās just LLM built on top peopleās data.
but none of these are what glados is, glados is like if you put a brain into a robot which creates horrible new urges and filters your sensory input, and after some time youāre just a different person due to all the trauma and how fucked your interaction with the world is
I completely forgot what post am I in š I kind of feel like sheās a just a sentient AI, controlled by personality cores and tasked to do the jobs Aperture Science is supposed to achieve.
What made me feel that way is because thereās a possibility/implied that Caroline didnāt consent to be put into glados, and the fact that glados can also be activated & deavtivated by Aperture workers. Also since her personality can be adjusted, like when she has high urges to murder, the Aperture workers just put morality core.
Also Iām not sure if Glados is properly aware that sheās doesnāt live in the same body as Caroline then nor Iām sure if glados know that Cave Johnson is dead. Or if did she ever found that out, I donāt remember, I donāt remember much of Portal 2.
I suppose sheās more like omnics in Overwatch. Omnics are like sentient robots. But in Overwatch, omnics are treated closer like a human than ordinary robots.
I mean what Overwatch did is to make an allegory to IRL systemic racism. But since realistically now in real life omnics are still not human, so my position is that both omnics & glados, a very advanced sentient robots, are not human.
also I feel a bit weird that my personal stance is that pronouns (except āitā) isnāt necessary to a thing, or robot. But since the game uses she/her pronoun for glados, I just kind of went with that.
I usually feel like pronouns (except āitā) is just for human. But people do use pronouns to animals sometimes. I guess itās valid & not just for human.
Ultimately Iām not so familiar with it. English is my second language and my native language doesnāt have gendered pronoun.
damn thatās like a philosophical question.
But in my opinion, if itās a real human consciousness and itās the one itself that have total authorithy for their body, then I think itās human. Like cyborg.
Except when it is not entirely independent, like stalkers in Half-Life 2, theyāre under control of someone else. Or Half-Life headcrab zombies where itās under control of the headcrab, but the human is terribly miserable. I think killing the zombie would put that misery to end which helps the hijacked person.
If itās not a real consciousness but merely an LLM spit out of the personsā lifetime social media personality data, then itās a clanker.
I think this is kind of more realistic, social media corporation will launch a feature that āreviveā a dead person as a personality that people can interact with, but they will try to humanize it as much as possible in the marketing language, implying itās a real consciousness while in reality itās just LLM built on top peopleās data.
But who am I, Iām not a philosopher.
but none of these are what glados is, glados is like if you put a brain into a robot which creates horrible new urges and filters your sensory input, and after some time youāre just a different person due to all the trauma and how fucked your interaction with the world is
I completely forgot what post am I in š I kind of feel like sheās a just a sentient AI, controlled by personality cores and tasked to do the jobs Aperture Science is supposed to achieve.
What made me feel that way is because thereās a possibility/implied that Caroline didnāt consent to be put into glados, and the fact that glados can also be activated & deavtivated by Aperture workers. Also since her personality can be adjusted, like when she has high urges to murder, the Aperture workers just put morality core.
Also Iām not sure if Glados is properly aware that sheās doesnāt live in the same body as Caroline then nor Iām sure if glados know that Cave Johnson is dead. Or if did she ever found that out, I donāt remember, I donāt remember much of Portal 2.
I suppose sheās more like omnics in Overwatch. Omnics are like sentient robots. But in Overwatch, omnics are treated closer like a human than ordinary robots.
I mean what Overwatch did is to make an allegory to IRL systemic racism. But since realistically now in real life omnics are still not human, so my position is that both omnics & glados, a very advanced sentient robots, are not human.
also I feel a bit weird that my personal stance is that pronouns (except āitā) isnāt necessary to a thing, or robot. But since the game uses she/her pronoun for glados, I just kind of went with that.
I usually feel like pronouns (except āitā) is just for human. But people do use pronouns to animals sometimes. I guess itās valid & not just for human.
Ultimately Iām not so familiar with it. English is my second language and my native language doesnāt have gendered pronoun.