Microsoft owes $29 billion in back taxes plus penalties and interest to IRS::The IRS sent a surprise bill to Microsoft, hitting the company with a $28.9 billion bill for back taxes and penalties spanning a decade, starting in 2003.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The IRS agent who worked up this case is either going to be up for a few days of extra vacation time or perhaps a job at Microsoft.

    • bastion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if we treat then like people, they easily deserve that (and some criminal charges) for circumventing tax law.

      If organizations are treated like people, they must be accountable to the law in a proportional way.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dissolve them. That fucked country still has fucking death penalty.

  • jmd_akbar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Next week, Microsoft negotiates the pending tax figure to $0…

    Week after that, Microsoft is raising Office plans by $5 per user per month across the board to cover their tax bills…

    • spudwart@spudwart.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Paying to use Microsoft office when OnlyOffice exists, lmao.

      And if it’s a company paying for the user’s Microsoft office bs, then imo the point is mute.

      Honestly, Microsoft can get bent. They aren’t going to negotiate to 0, these actions are being done after being long overdue, and it’s clear this administration is raising hell.

      And the extra incentive here of $29B in tax dollars isn’t going to hurt either.

      EDIT: LibreOffice is great if you live in a bubble world where Microsoft Office hasn’t dominated the business and school markets for 30 years. But here in the real world OnlyOffice and Google Docs are popular because they’re backwards compatible.

      If LibreOffice ever wants to have a chance of overtaking OnlyOffice, Google Docs or Microsoft Office, they need to work on backwards compatibility with Doc and Docx. Also I don’t get the “payware” issue. They’re selling services. The Software is FOSS. It’s AGPL v3.

      • dezmd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        OnlyOffice? The fuck is that?

        Looks

        Repackaged open source payware trash.

        LibreOffice works just fine without having yet another third party dev pilfering it to make it their bankroll. They’ve seemingly built an entire ecosystem with resellers and all trying to FUD themselves into a claim of being more compatible with MS doc formats than LibreOffice.

        Support LibreOffice development instead.

        https://www.libreoffice.org/

        Or…

        Just pay for MS Office if you have document compatibility concerns.

        • PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          OnlyOffice is amazing if you need compatibility with MS Office products. Not saying it’s perfect, and I have and use LibreOffice, but OnlyOffice is better fit than LibreOffice if your goal is to use MSOffice files in FOSS software. I don’t get to decide what files and software my school or work uses, and they use only MSOffice. If I hand my boss or coworker an ODS, they’ll have no clue what to do with it. LibreOffice doesn’t handle XLSX files nearly as cleanly as OnlyOffice.

          If I make a table in LibreOffice, even using their open formats, I am giving up some nice features from OpenOffice.

          There’s no way OO is just a cheap repackage of LO. They look very different and have different features.

      • PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure why you’re getting downvoted. OO is great for MSOffice files. I love LibreOffice, and it’s great for many things. It just can’t beat OO at MSOffice interoperability

  • Haha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow I wish I could not pay taxes for 3 decades and like do something nice with all that money…

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay they aren’t good, but seriously what makes them a monopoly? I haven’t seen anyone make a good argument for this. There isn’t a single industry they’re in, that I know or can think of, that they hold enough market capture to be a monopoly.

      • Nobody@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Microsoft has lots of kickass stuff. Just Bing it, bro. Or jump on Teams with me and I’ll explain it while I rock out with my Zune.

        /s obv

  • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So where are all those fake democrats complaining that Biden’s funding the IRS is just going to have them go after small businesses and the lower/middle classes?

    How’s that go? Gaslight, obstruct, project? lol

    The IRS overwhelmingly go after poor people as they don’t have the means to defend themselves and end up settling out of desperation.

    I’m sure after they get more money they’ll totally change though lol

    Applejacks where you at buddy?

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      False dichotomy. They can go for a big, easy target as well as little peeps. Monitoring $600 transactions kind of shows they’re not just interested in big guys.

      • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right? It’s so silly that they think it’s an all or nothing process. Then again, it’s the internet lmfao.

        How about we uphold that the law and taxes are for ALL people, not just rich or poor. We have graduated/progressive tax brackets for a reason. Everyone should be paying their fair share.

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but they eared more than double that in profit in their 2023 year. This is taxes over a 20 year period.

      In this context it does not seem like it’s too much.

  • ApeNo1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Clippy pops up on Excel. “Hey, it looks like you are trying to funnel revenue through a shell organisation in the Caribbean.”

  • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Next week’s news: Microsoft negotiates tax bill down to $3.50. You still need to pay out the ass for healthcare, peasants.

  • ignism@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    With that money you could buy yourself a default search engine position at Apple.

      • ours@lemmy.film
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or not quite half a Twitter (pre-Musk).

        Space stations cost less than what some “send a short message” platform does… insanity.

    • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      With that much money, you could effectively end homelessness in the U.S. for a full year [1]


      1. According to a rough estimate by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, it would cost $20 billion in 2012 dollars to afford every homeless person in the U.S. with one year of housing via vouchers. Independent groups have more recently recalculated this amount as ~$30 billion in 2023 dollars using similar methodologies. This is an estimated annual cost, but advocates argue that the program pays for itself – both in the sense that eliminating homelessness will reduce costs to other social programs & in the sense that many homeless will eventually return to self-sufficiency if given a fair opportunity. ↩︎

  • erranto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine any other citizen doing the same. they would be rotting in prison.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d like to agree but it is not illegal to not pay your taxes. It is illegal to not file your taxes. So if you file your taxes and owe $5,000, you can’t go to jail/prison for not paying it.

  • alienanimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most of the major corporations in the US do not pay their fair share of taxes. Fuck the greedy pigs.

  • ColeSloth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Five years from now it’ll be settled and Microsoft will pay ten billion.