Israelis ink the memory of deadly attacks onto their skin | Reuters

EILAT, Israel, Oct 19 (Reuters) - The date Oct. 7 will be forever etched in Israeli history, marking the day Hamas gunmen rampaged through southern communities, killing 1,400 people, in the country’s deadliest attack since its founding in 1948.

Now, many Israelis are getting the date tattooed on their bodies to commemorate the dead and missing, and bear witness to the collective tragedy.

“It was a very difficult date for the whole state of Israel, including for those who weren’t in the affected areas,” said tattoo artist Roey Benezri-Levy, who works in the seaside resort of Eilat, far from where Hamas attacked.

“Some people choose to tattoo images that remind them of their home, the family, or the people kidnapped, in one way or another,” he said. “Many of them write the date, October 7. We all understand what that means.”

University student Gal Nishman got a tattoo on his back in black and blue ink combining a Star of David with the numerals 7/10.

“The truth is I don’t know anyone who was murdered, fortunately … but the tattoo for me is a symbol,” he said. “On one side (the tattoo) is dark, representing those who were captured. On the other, there is blue, the Star of David, Israel, (showing) that we’re here to win.”

Benezri-Levy said clients had found solace in the experience. “Many folks told me it lifted a heavy weight off their hearts. It brought out feelings I haven’t felt before. It gave me a lot of strength, a lot of hope,” he said.

Another tattoo artist, Sheli Eliel, has also been busy since the attacks in her studio in Magan Michael, some 400 km (250 miles) north of Eilat, on the Mediterranean coast.

“It’s therapeutic,” she said. “I never asked questions before, but during the tattooing, the stories come out, they share them and cry. It is quite amazing,” she said.

Among those seeking to commemorate recent events was Hadas Karmazin, a resident from the south, close to the border of the Gaza Strip, controlled by Hamas, who has been evacuated from her home as Israeli forces gather ahead of a possible invasion.

She had three stars inked close to her heart to represent her three sons, two of whom are in combat units while the third is set to enlist this month.

She also had a large lotus flower tattooed on her forearm, saying it represented Israeli residents of the south. “It grows with glory and flourishes even in murky water, especially in murky water,” she said. “Despite everything I will return home.”

  • blashork [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 year ago

    After using my religion as a cover for their genocidal colonial project, they simultaneously broke one of it’s laws and trivialized the holocaust.

    Like not only is this a weird fucked up brainworms thing, but also getting tattoos is explicitly prohibited in judaism.

    Anywyas, I hope they all have some white phosphorus backfire on them and it burns their skin so thoroughly no one can recognize their corpses let alone any tattoos on them.

    palestine-strong palestine-heart

    • mar_k [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      getting tattoos is explicitly prohibited in judaism

      Israel has a lot of secular Jewish people that are still generally ethno-nationalist supremacists. Even Netanyahu was raised secular, oddly enough. So you have atheist and agnostic Jews that don’t even believe in the Holy Land shit but still support a Jewish homeland on the basis of “Jewish identity” and lebensraum propaganda they’ve been fed their whole lives

    • NewLeaf@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. The Internet is basically unusable right now. I’m just glad I don’t work with anyone who talks about this

      • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some Jewish cemeteries won’t let you be buried there if you have tattoos. Obviously depends on how strict the cemetery/burial society is but it’s not unheard of, though I’d imagine they make exceptions for Holocaust survivors.

        • Orannis62 [ze/hir]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          To my knowledge this isn’t really a thing anymore. But yes, when it was more of a thing they did make exceptions for Holocaust survivors

    • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If they visit the US in a place that’s hot like NYC in the summertime - they’ll soon wear long sleeve shirts so they don’t get any more questions. They might even have to buy some overly warm shirts being that every time an American asks them that question - they rage.

  • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Imagine being Jewish and tattooing a string of numbers on that part of your arm.

    Also if you tattooed every atrocity Israel has committed against Palestine onto your arm there would not be enough space to list them all.

    Privileged ethnostate bullshit.

  • supafuzz [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    haha is this a humiliation fetish thing

    I know when my settler-colonial project in which I’m heavily invested gets profoundly humiliated on an international stage, I want to be reminded of that every time I look at my forearm

    • SpiderFarmer [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There was a time in my life where I was out of it enough to write on myself or clothes cause I was such a disaster. But it was stuff like “buy eggs” and not this cringe shit we’re dunking on.

  • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    what i can’t fathom about this affair is how they’re characterizing it as uniquely threatening & scary for Israel… the six-day war? yom-kippur war? y’know, times the actual full armed forces of neighboring countries fought them? with more IDF casualties even? these (presumably young) people’s parents fought tanks and jet aircraft where are they getting off thinking a small-arms razzia is unfathomable violence?

    is Israel just America, with no sense of history whatsoever or what?

    • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      razzia

      I googled that. Good word.

      Israel just America

      Israel has gone mask off. Israelis seem to have entirely forgotten they live in a tiny country and there isn’t a big ocean separating it from its enemies. When apologists for Israel or IDF spokesmen or Israeli pols have spoken I’ve only listened to a minute or two here or there. I can’t stand to hear them go on and on. But it seems to be that they all sound the same. And it’s far beyond the usual “Israel has a right to defend itself.” They aren’t saying that "Israel has a right to slaughter and commit ethnic cleansing but it’s pretty clear that’s what they want. Their conception of international diplomacy is that Israel gets to do whatever it want.

      Once Israel’s ground war starts - for a while they’ll keep calling it an “incursion” even though it’s clearly a ground war. And then I don’t think they’ll even try to hide their glee once civilians are in the crossfire. They’ll cheer the slaughter and they’ll say “This is Hamas’s war and they are responsible,” or “Civilians die in war,” or “I’m sorry to say this. This is war. This is what happens.”

      And once it’s clear that ethnic cleansing is happening they’ll say stuff like “Israel must do this. Israel has no choice.” They will decide on a preferred euphemism for ethnic cleansing. Annexation? Whatever the substitute word - they’ll say the same sort of stuff about that too: “Israel must do this. Israel has no choice.”

        • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m American and I don’t know a more common, single word for razzia. As a substitute all I can think of is phrases like “cause death and destruction”. I don’t like the word “raid” because it’s so vague and can be milder sounding euphemism for killing and r*pe.

          The problem is that Americans hate words they don’t know so I can only use razzia a few places - like here. Using it at reddit would only annoy me because I’d get “Well, actually…” comments that it’s a historical word referring to slaves or redditors would tell me they don’t know the word, they won’t google. Fine, you own me by being proudly ignorant. I’m so owned.

          Anyway - once Israel starts its ground war - I better not talk online at big sites because that will make me a crazy person and words won’t mean anything there anyway.

          • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            specifically ‘cavalry raid’ has purchase in american eyes because they’re a famous part of the civil war, but that’s a bit confusing if cavalry isn’t doing it. and there’s also connotations attached to the -other- thing the US did with cavalry raids out west, so it wouldn’t be a great way to talk about tactics used against empire. i’m pretty sure there’s a racist reverse term for indian campaigns using similar tactics against settlers but im not inclined to track it down

          • Venus [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m American and I don’t know a more common, single word for razzia.

            Idk, I’ve also never heard this word before but after looking it up I’d just say raid? It apparently has connotations of being about moors raiding to take slaves and I don’t see how those connotations are helpful in this context

            • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              The problem with raid is that it’s so vague. The right-wing media says “The FBI raided Mar-a-Lago,” but of course that’s silly. They told Trump days (weeks?) in advance so he had plenty of time to move/hide his stuff.

              Here’s what Wikipedia says.

              Razzia (military)

              A razzia (from French razzia “incursion”, and from Algerian Arabic ġaziya (غزية), “algara” or “raid”) is a term used to refer to a surprise attack against an enemy settlement. Although it primarily sought to obtain booty, historically the objectives of a razzia have been diverse: the capture of slaves, ethnic or religious cleansing, expansion of territory, and intimidation of the enemy.