tchncs
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 7 days ago

Meta Workers Say They're Seeing Disturbing Things Through Users' Smart Glasses

futurism.com

external-link
message-square
102
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • privacy@programming.dev
  • fuck_ai@lemmy.world
410
external-link

Meta Workers Say They're Seeing Disturbing Things Through Users' Smart Glasses

futurism.com

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 7 days ago
message-square
102
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • privacy@programming.dev
  • fuck_ai@lemmy.world
Meta contractors in Kenya told two Swedish newspapers that they're being told to review highly sensitive footage recorded by smart glasses.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Psyhackological@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why and who’s buying those?

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yet another surveilance tool marketed as a cool tech gadget.

    • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      I remember when cool tech gadgets were cool and not undisguised spy tools.

      • FatVegan@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s almost absurd at this point, but i used to be really into gadgets and tech and shit. Now everything i see is like: that’s a spy tool. That’s showing ads. That is an ad. That is just a lie.

        • JoeMontayna@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Same. At most I got 15 years left and I doubt I will ever see this changing in my lifetime.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      How is this cool in any way.

      • Vupware@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        The future is now, old man!

    • altphoto@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      They wouldn’t! Not a penis camera right? Thry wouldn’t!

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Oh they would!
        And then make it mandatory for everyone with a penis.
        For child protection, you know.

        Just noticed Child Protection.

  • JoeMontayna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    7 days ago

    It really doesn’t matter if facial recognition is enabled or not today, it can always be done later on. This is a huge invasion of privacy.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t think even George Orwell could have predicted that one day they’d put the cameras inside glasses, it would be common knowledge that they’re in there and the they’re spying on you and everyone you look at, and people would still voluntarily buy them with their own money and wear them around.

      • lessthanluigi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Just wait until they have brainwave scanners on the sides

      • ki9@lemmy.gf4.pw
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        In soviet russia, glasses see you!

  • Kubiac
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 days ago

    I don’t know what’s worse. Meta admitting to spy and nothing happens or the dumb people still buying their crap and using their services.

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    6 days ago

    Le facebook product is… le spying?

  • rockandsock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    So you’re telling me that the creepy motherfuckers who would wear something like this around in public do creepy things?

    Never would have guessed that. 🤔

    • ChanchoManco@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Also why is Meta watching that footage?

      • rockandsock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m pretty sure they monitor everything on all of their platforms, I don’t know if they have to for legal reasons or just choose to.

        • ChanchoManco@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah, sorry I just read the article and found the answer, they tag the videos to train their AI.

  • bahcodad@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 days ago

    Well that’s what you get for spying on people. Duh

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Meta learning what the meme-CIA agents had been subjected to for years.

  • Lor@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    Wow, what an admission. Peeping META?

  • tracyspcy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    What a surprise

  • Einar@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    'I have nothing to hide."

    /s

    • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Except for the first part of that quote. /s

  • knee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    Orwell got it wrong with the wall mounted screens - ‘they’ want us to wear the screens. What was that album title? 'If you accept this,your kids are next., ’ Can’t remember which band

    • OrgunDonor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      If you tolerate this, your children will be next. Is a Manic Street Preachers song.

      • knee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Thanks, almost got it right. A long while since I listened.

      • AceBonobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        They’ll be next and they won’t know any better

    • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      What was that album title? 'If you accept this,your kids are next., ’

      “If You Tolerate This Your Children Will Be Next.” By the Manic Street Preachers.

      • knee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s the one, thanks. Almost got it right!

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Orwell also got it wrong not predicting people would not want to turn of their telescreens

      • knee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Absolutely. IIRC, the option of turning them off was only available to very high ranking members and even then only for relatively short periods of time.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Now we have Boomers with Fox on 24/7.

          • ᴍᴜᴛɪʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴡᴀᴠᴇ @lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Been had that

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    Kathryn Bigelow’s most under-rated film is almost upon us…just 30 years later than we thought.

    Also…if you haven’t seen that movie…go watch it. It’s low-key one of her best.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I know this is off-topic, but Kathryn Bigelow is just an under-rated director in general I think. So many bangers. Also from a quick search I just found out she had a new movie out last year that stars Idris Elba, Rebecca Ferguson and Jared Harris? Somehow I missed that entirely.

      • HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Oh! In addition too Strange Days she directed the OG Point Break and The Hurt Locker! All great movies!

    • HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Great 90s cyberpunk movie. Way better than Johnny Mnemonic and Judge Dread.

      Also starred the smokin’ hot Angela Basset as a bonus.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    But this is not the problem but a symptom. Of you having no right to privacy (and if, it can be overwritten by some ToS).

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well you definitely don’t have any right to privacy in public in the US.

      • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        You have a reduced right to privacy in public but not eliminated all together.

  • fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    We get to return to the verbiage “glasshole” right

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Definitely not a Sony Walkman, which was cool and the foam headphones were comfortable to wear. I miss the simple analog days.

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.11K users / day
  • 3.48K users / week
  • 7.89K users / month
  • 15.2K users / 6 months
  • 564 local subscribers
  • 47.1K subscribers
  • 4.77K Posts
  • 113K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t@lemmy.ml
  • tmpod@lemmy.pt
  • Yayannick@lemmy.ml
  • ranok@sopuli.xyz
  • BE: 0.19.16
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org