• RGB3x3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But if it’s a Trinity, why are they listed separately if they’re not separate? Why make the distinction if they’re one and the same?

    Who did God send down to die for our sins? Why does Jesus have a name if he just is god? Why not call him God?

    If he is god, why is the resurrection so special? Wouldn’t you expect God to be deathless anyway?

    I’m half being difficult, half wondering what the real answers are.

    • expatriado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      that’s their secret, shit doesn’t have to make sense, and each branch can make up its own interpretation for the pesky details

      • kozy138@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you the same person you were 15 years ago? Your name is the same. So is your social security number. But those were assigned to you by an external party.

        You look different, feel different, act different. Are you the same person you were yesterday?

    • jozep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is what I understood from the teachings of the Catholic Church:

      There are sacred mysteries which are not explainable by rational or scientific reasoning and thus believing in these mysteries is the catholic faith.

      So the Trinity means God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit are separate and the same.

      Resurrection is special because God lived as a human, died to cleanse the sins of all humans (dying is a punishment for the sins) and his resurrection means he is really God, he cannot die and doing so he defeated death itself. Which means all humans believing in God will be able to cheat death and live eternally in paradise.

      God died for our sins because he loves humans and wants them to be free of sin.

      Trying to understand this through reason is not possible. You need faith, this is the whole shtick.

      Again this is my understanding, been a long time since I went to catechism.

      • tastysnacks@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Trying to understand this through reason is not possible. You need faith, this is the whole shtick.

        This is why I’m not religious. I believe God would have a more elegant solution.

      • Duranie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Growing up attending various Protestant churches, the basics re the Trinity was that God is the Father/Creator of everything, the Holy Spirit is essentially His spiritual form, and Jesus was His earthly human form. YMMV by denomination.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, you had the right word.

            I was just making a joke because it sounds like “Cataclysm”.

    • wischi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The best analogy I’ve heard so far is that god is like water and trinity is a bit like the aggregate states liquid, solid, gas. They are the same (water) but liquid water is obviously different from ice and steam.

    • aname@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      More specifically, they are not one and same. Father is not Son is not Holy Spirit, but all of them are God.

      Your questions are better answered by theologicians. I am not even a Christian, but even I know about concept of trinity. Perhaps everything about God is not meant to be comprehensible by humans. God is beyond humans after all.

      • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        For anyone wondering how this breaks down logically and where the error is:

        The position as put here and elsewhere contains logical errors upon clarification. God has parts? Okay what makes the parts unique and discrete? If they aren’t, they aren’t parts of a whole and are equal to the whole.

        For example: does the father have the same knowledge as the spirit? The same powers? If yes to these and similar questions, then they all are god and are not discrete. If no, then we don’t have one god at all, we have 3 gods. Also if no, the gods cannot be all knowing or all powerful individually.

        I’ve never heard it put like this comment though. Instead I hear that they’re all god. As in, Jesus isn’t 1/3 of god, he is god. And so is the spirit/ghost and father. But if I ask if Jesus is the spirit, they’ll say no. This is an identity flaw. You’re saying that A=D and C=D but A!=C.

        • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is what you’re describing and is a good pictograph for explaining why it’s nonsense that cannot be presented in any accepted form of propositional logic.

          OP commenter got mad at “pagans” for not describing something in terms of a contradictions, while accepting that contradiction on its own terms. Theist mad at accurate meme.

        • aname@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What’s so hard about it. My house is a home, a storage and an awful dump at the same time. All those have different attributes but they are the same house all together.

          • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            These are interchangeable, the trinity is not. Your house is/can be a home, storage, dump, but a home can be storage and storage can be a dump.

            The claims of the trinity are that the son, father, and ghost are all god. But the ghost is not the son is not the father.

            It’s an identity contradiction. A,B, and C all equal D. But A is not B is not C. The claim IS NOT A + B + C = D which would actually make sense and works with your analogy. Like yes my house is a dump + storage + home. That works. Does not work with the trinity.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Calm down, silly. Did you forget that we’re dealing with magic? Now that I’ve reminded you, everything should be fine.

    • jedi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And don’t even get me started on all the theatrics in the Bible. I mean, why did God even bother to sneak temptation into the Garden of Eden for Adam and Eve? Why put all his shady stuff on Satan’s to-do list? And let’s not forget about flooding the entire planet! To me, the Bible seems more like another epic science fiction novel, complete with a variety of plot twists and mystery elements. Really, it’s more ‘Star Trek’ than holy scripture in my eyes.