• protput@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A good alternative to keepass is a self hosted vaultwarden btw. (compiled from bitwardens opensource code iirc)

    • sol@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Vaultwarden is not compiled from Bitwarden’s code, it’s a separate project and codebase but designed to be compatible with Bitwarden’s API.

      Bitwarden is open source and you can self-host it but IIRC it’s a bit more complex and resource-hungry than Vaultwarden.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They have totally different design goals which is why Bitwarden is more resource-hungry and more complex to deploy. Bitwarden can scale up to large use cases such as companies with hundreds of thousands of employees (it’s what they run on the hosted version, after all), whereas Vaultwarden is designed to be small and light for home use cases where you almost always have <10 users total.

    • Brayd
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. But I think is much easier for people to use KeePass compared to self hosting Vaultwarden