Edit: Replies to this thread indicate this is not fully correct as it exists on all browsers; and is likely an ad thing.

  • Superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    183
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the person who tweeted this scrolled down in the hackernews thread, they’d see this code was misinterpreted. It’s part of an anti Adblock script that runs 5s after page load. Still shitty, but less insidious

    • Johanno@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh they think that delay in the beginning is malicious .

      I noticed a huge drop in bandwidth until I logged out of YouTube. This was a onetimer however.

  • HeChomk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t use the youtube website. On any browser. Use freetube instead, if your situation and use case allows it. No Google bullshit required. Loads fast, no ads, no tracking. Fully self contained.

    • Virkkunen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really appreciate you saying “if your situation and use case allows it”. I’m sick of people “suggesting” these kind of things by just saying “don’t do this” “stop doing that” while completely ignoring that not everyone has the same use cases, preferences and possibilities for such.

    • Fisch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wish there was a GTK Piped client. Freetube has that kinda janky feeling of a browser (it’s an Electron app, so not surprising) and I don’t see why I wouldn’t just use Piped in a browser then.

    • CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does freetube show recommendations? Most free clients seem to scrape your subscriptions and lack features like playlists.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whoever posted this is not a programmer. Does no conditional on that code so it would run on every browser on every session so where’s the check for Firefox?

    Unless they are claiming that it is injected at runtime. But that’s easily provable/disprovable with agent spoofing.

    • heavyboots@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In the demo I saw they did an agent spoofing to Chrome and the delay went away, but it didn’t look very extensively tested. As others said, the disappearance on reload could easily be because they thought he was returning to the page and had already seen the ad/been punished for not seeing the ad and so something ad-related disappeared instead.

      • idunnololz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Iirc the thing is it loads a different js file when it detects chrome which doesn’t have the 5s delay. The reasoning is this is part of some anti adblocker code and chrome didn’t need the extra logic.

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It would not be the first time Google was caught doing this. A couple years ago they were caught breaking apps like google maps if your user agent string wasnt chrome.

    But recently I’ve noticed they can tell regardless of that string. So my guess is that they’ve hidden fingerprinting code in the chrome browser

      • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep, and it doesn’t help that google controls almost all web browsers. They literally give websites your personal information now that cookies are no longer allowed.

        So if you’re gay and live in Iraq, you better make absolutely sure to only visit your school’s website on computer you lend from friends or school computers

  • ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is not correct.

    Most of the posts/articles reference following reddit post: https://old.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/17ywbjj/whenever_i_open_a_youtube_video_in_a_new_tab_its/k9w3ei4/ . It shows the code from your screenshot. However the code does not check the user agent and is not injected server side (I checked by user agent spoofing and using a freshly installed chrome). So it will run on every browser and cannot be used against some specific ones.

    There is an answer to the post everyone seems to reference, which goes a bit deeper into what the code could do: https://old.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/17ywbjj/whenever_i_open_a_youtube_video_in_a_new_tab_its/ka08uqj/

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    yea there does appear to be delay but it doesnt target firefox users specifically (i think) or atleast isn’t obvious to me cuz the code is obfuscated. more likely related to ads (since there is a 5 second delay before you can skip ads). anti-adblock maybe yes.

  • Chemical Wonka
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will make a call to a friend of mine called EU to solve this problem.

  • SootySootySoot [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    uBlock on firefox here, no User Agent spoofing, videos load in ~1-2 seconds as normal still. Wouldn’t surprise me if it’s used in nicher circumstances though.