Channel 1 AI released a promotional video explaining how the service will provide personalized news coverage to users from finance to entertainment.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    This won’t hilariously backfire at all…

      • MondayToFriday@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        The example where an interview of a victim of Hurricane Ciaran, originally in French, but deepfaked to be speaking English, was pretty scary. Some people will think that it’s just for convenience, but for me, it’s a step too far down the slippery slope. If they were to do the same for a politician, a slight nuance in how a phrase was translated could change everything.

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah for any sort of interviews I’d rather they kept the current convention of using a voice over, often after a 1-2 second clip of the original audio. It’s obvious that it’s a translation done by the media and not the exact original words of the source

          • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            a leaky abstraction is better because it reveals what is actually happening. That is better to me too. Heck I worry about the voice-overs giving an unfair or inaccurate version of what is being said.

    • kakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I wonder if they’ve learned anything from the infamous Nothing Forever incident, or the infamous Infinite Steam incident, or any of the other various incidents.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        To be fair, it looks like this actually has human editors and isn’t just running as a hands free experiment.

        • kakes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Nothing Forever got a 14 day ban for generating this standup routine:

          “There’s like 50 people here and no one is laughing. Anyone have any suggestions? I’m thinking about doing a bit about how being transgender is actually a mental illness. Or how all liberals are secretly gay and want to impose their will on everyone. Or something about how transgender people are ruining the fabric of society. But no one is laughing, so I’m going to stop. Thanks for coming out tonight. See you next time. Where’d everybody go?”

          As for Infinite Steam, the only references to the banned clip seem to be on Reddit - and so a massive pain in the ass to access - but I remember the clip in question had Seymour saying something like “Oh no, I burned the Jews!”

        • gullible@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Tay was such a hilarious snafu. It is, in all likelihood, one of the most influential lessons on AI. Modern models hold no memory of previous conversations for a very good reason.

    • Cheers@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sounds a bit like the recent exploit for saying a word forever. I wonder how long until these break down and start spewing their source code.

  • donuts@kbin.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 months ago

    Wonderful. Nothing will help people differentiate between real, trustworthy news and fake opinion-laden disinformation like AI generated people and content!

    /s for the kids in the back.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Couldn’t be any worse than the current model for televised news, which is 2-4 buzzword parrots all attempting to shout over each other without ever attempting to address what the others are saying.

    Being human doesn’t make it good.

    Wake me up when there’s a better medium than just plain text.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, the news already has standard looks and standard cadence while reading scripts. A computer made anchor won’t go off script, always speaks the same and doesn’t decide to change the hairstyle.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s why the Onion can make such great fake news coverage, or movies use news coverage as an introduction to world building. It’s very reproducable…

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      The use of unrelated b-roll and stock footage is already a nightmare in this way. One burning trash can becomes the new standard-bearer for any protest they disagree with for the next year or two. Now they can fine tune it to location …

      Honestly, for the news, these sorts of tricks for effect NEED to be clearly and constantly marked during their use. It is actually dangerous the way they currently do it, imho.

      I’m biased enough towards transparency, though I think if they do use AI then they should have to reveal the prompt and model used to make it on top of clearly and constant marking showing it is not actual footage.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The deepest of ironies in a company allegedly made to report “facts”, primarily using artificiality to do so.

      Even if they are completely earnest and honest, the tech they are helping spearhead is going to completely change how information is approached and will be one of the biggest challenges, if not the biggest challenge, we are going to face as a society in a long time. This is really unnerving to watch develop in front of my eyes.

      • shasta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I feel like they’re shooting themselves in the foot with this. If AI reporting gets to a good enough point, people can just have an AI on their phone tell them the news report, rather than a video of an AI giving the report, broadcast from a central server. They will lose their viewers

  • Kiernian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    If they make one of them look and speak like Morbo the Annihilator, I might actually watch.

    Like, with the anti-human sentiment and everything.

    First Anchor: And today, a local law firm files the first lawsuit in a series over a deadly salmonella outbreak linked to cantaloupe.

    Morbo: Next time, we will put the salmonella in more than just the canteloupe.

    or maybe:

    Morbo: Canteloupe tonight, Bridegroom has the runs!

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    This felt a lot like Naked News but y’know I’d rather look at titties while being given a bland delivery and near robotic gestures.

    But AI, so I’m sure naked AI news anchors are right around the corner.

    • Joker
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ha! I remember that. I watched it once or twice for the novelty of it. I seem to recall that it was very bland except for the naked women. According to Wikipedia, they are still around and I think that may be more shocking than this AI news.

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    Okay… so honest question: how long did it take for you to close the linked video?

    In my case it was about 45 seconds. The weird hands/body language creeped me out and when combined with the synthetic voices I just couldn’t take it.

    • berg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I saw it all, albeit without audio. It honestly didn’t look that bad to me. They seemed a bit stiff and something was off with the hand gestures, other than that it was visually passable to me.

      I wonder how they did it though, and how procedural it can get.

    • Magrath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      The voice didn’t sync up to the lips and hand gestures when I watched it. That was enough for me.

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Even AI have no clue what to do with their hands.

      I’m waiting for the youth version where the anchor is dropped into an endless runner game.

    • Shazbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m convinced the AI had the hand on a loop. It’s like watching someone’s first presentation in speech and debate class. It will look better eventually, but I doubt it’ll figure out the subtle emphasis great body language adds to speech.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah, In gonna need names of everyone who contributed a dollar to that before I use it as a news source.

  • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Makes complete sense. I feel zero loyalty or trust towards what anchors are reading from a prompt. Save money and show me random ai generated ones. Better yet let me choose. I’ll pick new ones each

    • jayandp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Looks like it’ll be one of those free streaming channels on things like Pluto TV. So not an actual TV channel.

  • OpenHammer6677@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    More and more, the human element is being removed from the news. The most horrific events will be reported by blank-faced robots with no empathy to human emotions, at least in AI channels. Imagine what kind of emotional intelligence future people will have when they constantly hear stories from poker-faced (and voiced) human-like images.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I mean I think part of this is that the technology is reaching a point where emotion is actually reasonably emulatable.

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Hopefully we may be able to get some, at least intellectualized, empathy in models in the future. https://laion.ai/blog/open-empathic/

        I fear that for this kind of work, because of the stakeholders, the goal will be passable acting and not a genuine regard for people’s emotional well-being.

  • Pandantic@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Their hand moments took me out instantly. Just the same opening and closing of hands with some variation thrown it made it feel weird.

    • RainfallSonata@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The voices had a weird pacing, too. They sounded very close to real but just not quite, in an uncanny-valley sort of way.