Folks we have we worst media takes
We love it folks
There are only two things on which all Hexbearinos agree on
Pee-pee and poo-poo
You forgot cum
There are multiple Hexbearinos who possess a strong dislike for cum
I’m pro cum
struggle session incoming
Some people claim to be anti cum, yet they’re only alive because of cum. Curious!
This is Jesus erasure
Fun fact: Jesus was the first known case of IVF
i dunno, “the holy spirit” sure sounds like a euphemism to me
Wasn’t Mary just a young woman and the ‘virgin’ thing was a mistranslation? I saw it in a movie, so it must be true. This website also says it and the internet cannot lie
I’m anti cum
Only because we haven’t gotten around to banning them yet
Look, if you don’t want me to complain that a video is too long, then don’t post a video essay that would be six paragraphs of content if it were written down but instead has been fluffed out to thirty minutes.
Nobody’s making you watch it
Nobody’s making you post it, either
Nobody is forcing you to comment on the post
Wrong - my FBI handler said I had to make this website more toxic so we do more crimes
deleted by creator
Oh my goodness yes. If something can be presented well in a blog post, it damn well should be.
The real MVPs will do both a blog post and a video essay
What if I like there being a visual element and perhaps the occasional comedic aside?
I think a lot can be done with blog posts that have short embedded videos as appropriate.
There’s people out there making content like that. Idk I just don’t get their weird hostility towards a whole genre. If you don’t like it fine, if you have specific criticisms of a specific work fine, if you dislike how the industry is incentivizing it over other work fine, but it’s weird to just reflexively condemn the entire medium.
Video essays should never just be someone reading into a screen. Then it is no different from a regular essay. The ‘video’ part must play a central role for the video essay to have a valid reason of existence.
Even then too many of them have too much fluff to hit algorithmic length standards.
Yeah, so many copycats of channels like Nerdwriter and Every Frame A Painting completely miss the point of what those channels do with the medium.
This meme is revisionism. People here are just as ready to shank each other over philosophy, history, economics, etc. as they are to do it over media bullshit.
Those debates can get nasty but at least people generally have something of substance to say and common ground is often found.
The most and nasty ass comments I’ve seen here have been in media debates. It often descends into people making mean assumptions about each other based on their media tastes, like people assuming a poster must be white, or cis, or a virgin cuz they liked an anime someone else doesn’t.
Andor is doing a heckin Leninism
Andor is good but I do get the vibe it’s written by Libs who are also just military history nerds and accidentally made it seem Leninist cuz they read a bunch of shit about Che and the Bolsheviks before hand.
Accuratly portraying history is doing a communism. You dont have to intentionally do a communism to do a communism.
True but idk how accurate we can call it till it’s over
They can’t make the rebellion bad. It’s Star Wars. They can Grey it uo a bit but we already know how things go and it’s pretty clear who the good guys are and they won’t be allowed to change that too much.
What they can do is make the radical elements of the rebellion out to be holding them back, but it doesn’t make sense with the story at all.
That’s how Saw Gerrera is usually used, but Andor was special because they didn’t do that with him. He’s not bad in Andor because he’s too extreme, he’s an obstacle for Luthen because he refuses to unite- and he’s right to do so. If he’d agreed with Luthen in their first conversation his whole org would have been killed
Literally a TV show about interplanetary space empire ruled by an evil wizard, so… very likely it will deviate from reality by leaps and bounds.
Its entertainment. It happens to be entertainment with good politics, but its still just a big dumb show for the hogs. If you want history, read history. If you want politics, go to a fucking meeting full of other people interested in doing politics. If you want a fairy tale about some cool dudes cosplaying as that one Russian guy who successfully led a revolution, then that’s fine. Everyone wants a bit of entertainment now and then. But that’s what that is.
Humans are a storytelling species, I’d hazard that for the average person a well put together narrative has infinitely more swaying power than history. You can transform actual history into a clean, compelling narrative, but then much nuance is lost and it becomes something of a mistruth. To package a narrative taken from history into a fictional story allows the themes to stand out, without risking someone feeling misled.
Okay sure. But Space Wizards make for a poor historical dialectic.
I kinda like the “this man isn’t a space wizard, and yet must oppose them” aspect. But yeah, in general, totally.
That’s fine by me cause they’re stuck with a cannon where the rebellion is absolutely the good guys. I’m certain it was by accident but it’d be pretty lib of me to judge thebintent behind something rather than the material result.
Media which packs the same information into a shorter time span time takes more time to produce. So if you think about it, if you say Harris Bomb Man’s 4 hour video is boring, you’re actually saying you’re entitled to free labor
Wojack is a reactionary, fascist meme template and should be rejected, you lib!
What shall we use?
Half-Life series has so much leftist subtext it’s just text
Eh, the resistance being lead by nerdy scientists seems a little Reddit STEMlord
Accurate. A better revolution would be all those poor bastards you see around City 17 leading things instead of the nerds (I say as a nerdy engineer person).
i always got anti-soviet vibes from HL2 personally, especially since the combine cops have gas masks that are almost identical to certain soviet gas masks. that and the dreary dilapidated vaguely eastern european scenery. plus its literally about a great man who is chosen by some magical briefcase guy to be the hero. idk to me it was like an anti-soviet YA novel.
If anything, I’d say that Half-Life 2 ridicules the idea of the “great man”. For instance, the City 17 Uprising was only possible because of 20 years of the resistance building up under the assumption that Gordon was already dead, and the uprising was only triggered by the destruction of Nova Prospekt — which was completely accidental and not even Gordon’s fault. And for the first week of the City 17 Uprising, again, Gordon was completely absent and presumed dead, and yet the resistance just kept growing. All of the Combine’s focus on hunting down “Anticitizen One” ended up being pointless, because the resistance would just persist without him anyways, as it always had!
So, Gordon’s shoes could be filled by anybody at any point… But that’s exactly what you’re doing when you play a video game with a silent protagonist, anyways! Any “greatness” that Gordon has is your own. You are the “right man in the wrong place” — “being the hero” was your choice by continuing to play the game. All that the Gman really is is the sort of “middle man” between the real world and the game world — that’s my understanding, at least. The Gman is such an enigmatic figure that to me the best interpretations of him are always meta in some way, rather than just taking everything at face value.
Gordon achieved this sort of messianic status because the Black Mesa Incident had been made into this legend to inspire hope in the resistance. But Gordon Freeman himself remains aware throughout the entire game that his success has always at every point relied on others’ help, on the networks already in place, on the enemy’s mistakes, on the little coincidences here and there. Gordon just cannot speak for himself — just like the actual so-called “great men” of history cannot speak against their own mythologization.
I mean, I have a lot more thoughts on this, naturally, including some that touch on aesthetics — but it’s late and three probably very pretentious paragraphs is probably enough.
you could make this a video essay
At least 2 hours long, probably 2-3 90 minute parts.
One day soon the “If I have to hear about YouTube videos being too long ONE MORE TIME!” Youtube vid by UrsineShape1000 will be 1,000 hours long. And the post on it here is the most popular thread ever. Although it eventually causes a struggle session and is shut down at a few hundred comments which is far shorter than the hoped for 1,000 comments.
Eating my media slop with Stalin’s comically large spoon
I am so tired of rage comics but racist
based wojak yes chadjak chad cringe soyjak cope seethe sneed
wojaks should be made illegal
Brevity is the soul of wit. A man name Wilbert Shakesman said that.
What if my goal isn’t being witty but being encompassing?
willie shook i believe he was called
Bill shakey spear also thought dick jokes were hilarious (they are), so maybe we don’t have to treat his words like gospel.
(four hour video essay)
Me: This is outrageous! Youtube must retvrn to the era of ten minute uploads!
Also me: (watches that shit)
It is reactionary garbage tho
What is?
Whatever it is that you enjoy most.
I enjoy communism
you’re a fascist compared to communism 2.
A literal Banderite compared to Communism 3: With a Vengeance.
Yes
deleted by creator
The longer videos are just nice to listen to when cleaning the place or doing some other menial task