- Just like stories, this is yet another feature a messaging app shouldn’t have. - Absolutely, that and channels. Damn, I just want to keep in touch with the people I know, I don’t want to “follow” random shit in yet another app. 
 
- Who asked for this - Advertisers, probably. - Shareholders too! 
 
 
- Wait,…you thought that when Facebook bought WhatsApp that it wouldn’t slowly but surely wrap it all up into one product? - Since the day FB bought WhatsApp, it’s been breaking the rules of the agreements made when the acquisition went down. - There should be a massive movement and a call to forcibly break WhatsApp off from Meta again and maintain strict boundaries between the companies. - deleted by creator 
- Honestly wouldn’t mind using it if it fully broke off and just charged 2-5 bucks a year to use. 
- Or a movement to get people off whatsapp and into signal. 
 
- It seems that Meta is low-key following the “everything app” goal that Elon Musk wanted for Twitter/X, tying products like WhatsApp, Instagram, Threads while at the same time distancing themselves from the Facebook brand. - For example, WhatsApp is a chat app that has been enhanced to have Business Accounts, which allows for Bots, Stores and Payments. Further integration with Instagram could potentially use these features to tie together content+business. Threads is an enhancement over Instagram to add textual content. - They really want to be WeChat - It’ll never catch on in the US, though. We don’t need the functionality that an “everything app” like WeChat would provide. WeChat took off because it filled in a big gap for its users. The US already has a robust and diversified financial market and payments infrastructure that Zuck won’t have any chance of breaking into. - Still, becoming the US “WeChat” is a very wet dream for any corporation. Of course they will try. 
- The US already has a robust and diversified financial market and payments infrastructure - I heard that you folks up north still send written cheques via mail and sign little papers when use a credit card, doesn’t sound very robust or diversified to me - Valid, but our credit card and mobile payment penetration is way higher than China’s was at the time WeChat launched, and bank relationships are notoriously sticky. 
 
- deleted by creator 
 
 
- I was already unhappy when businesses started offering WhatsApp as a contact option… It’s only getting worse 
- Don’t fucking credit phony stark when talking about his everything app that doesn’t exist. Meanwhile China actually has such things, such as WeChat - Elon was simply trying to copy that model 
 
- The integration is not immediately visible and users would have to link their accounts in WhatsApp settings to access the option. - If true then don’t really care 
- Who fucking cares?? If you still use WhatsApp in 2023+ then you deserve to get fucked by meta, same thing is you use IG or FB. You only have yourself to blame. - Signal > WhatsApp trash - In India nobody texts on anything but WhatsApp and in Puerto Rico no buisiness has a website it’s all just Facebook pages. I am a huge privacy advocate but unfortunately I still depend on terrible tech due to the stubbornness of society. - I refuse to the last resort to use any service that belongs to Meta. If a business only has a Facebook page then it will not have me as a customer under any circumstances. Btw I don’t use WhatsApp since 2017, I just use Signal for all 
 
- Thank you for your comment, I didn’t need to say anything because you already said everything I thought. I agree with you 100% 
 











