• Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    9 months ago

    Growing up and never going there I always thought Hooters waitresses were topless. When I found out they weren’t, the whole thing actually sounded more pervy to me.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      9 months ago

      Strip clubs seem less demeaning to me lol. Hooters is basically if you took sexual harassment in the workplace and made it your gimmick.

      • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve been into Hooters and nobody sexually harasses the workers. I’d even dare someone touch one of the workers innapropiately… I’d like to see the beating they’d get.

        • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          9 months ago

          The point is that it’s a restaurant based on sexually objectifying waitresses. Not that people act inappropriate. It’s that the entire thing is inappropriate.

          • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            And a stripclub is also based on that. Should we close strip clubs? Are you the one who is going to tell strippers that they can no longer work because their job is wrong? Should we also tear down the porn industry? Even women enjoy places and activities that objectify men. Have you ever seen a bachelorette party?

            There are places for certain activities. Hooters is one of those places. Everything going on inside this place is 100% consensual.

            There’s a place in my city in which women actually touch and get touched by the male waiters. Pretty hardcore stuff… Most people agree that whatever happens in there is fine as long as people can’t see from the street.

            • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Not sure what’s with all the hyperbolic rhetorical strawman questions. My entire point is that it would be more normal if it was a strip club instead of an almost-strip club, like I said originally. What I’m objecting to is that it’s setup like a normal restaurant. Seems kind of pointless, too. If you want to go somewhere and ogle naked women, great, just go to an actual nude club and don’t take your kids.

              • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                I’ve never seen a kid in Hooters but if that’s the case the I’ll have to agree. Kids shouldn’t be allowed in there.

                • Railing5132@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Kids are allowed and I’ve seen kids as young as 7-10 in there. There isn’t an age limit. I’ve only had two experiences in a Hooters, well over a decade ago, and saw children at both. The food was marginal at best at both. Strange odds.

        • TheDeepState@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s like some of these people on here think that you get some wings and then rape the waitress for dessert.

      • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, pretty much it’s “let’s train people to think of waitresses as sex objects and stare at their tits”

    • assembly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      9 months ago

      I remember the first time I went. A vendor took us there for a business lunch as a get-to-know-you. The other guys were excited but I had never gone before. I distinctly remember my disappointment at the buffalo chicken sandwich and thinking these cannot be wing people. The waitresses were pretty but it just seemed weird to me that they dressed like it was still the 80s (in the mid 2000s) and the environment almost seemed to promote sexual harassment. Like it was a sexual harassment training ground or something.

      • ColeSloth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Is it exploiting women if the women are choosing to be exploited in exchange for money? Back in the 90s and early 2000’s when the place was still really popular and they only hired “hooters” women the ones that worked there would bring in a couple hundred more dollars on a shift than serving at any other restaurant. It seemed more like the waitresses were the ones exploiting the lonely weirdos. They’d always flirt and talk to the guys, get a $100 tip, and leave em out to dry.

        • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s like saying minimum wage workers aren’t being exploited because they ‘chose’ to work at a minimum wage job. If a Hooters pays 5% more than the next job, women will have to chose it if rent isn’t affordable otherwise.

          Saying that people can just ‘choose’ not work somewhere is just incredibly insensitive to how difficult it is to change jobs and move when you are living paycheck to paycheck. You might as well tell me that homeless people ‘choose’ to be homeless.

          • ColeSloth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m not talking 5%. I’m talking 150%.

            Also, what point are you trying to get at? You aren’t allowed to make more money by being eye candy? Are you saying women shouldn’t be allowed to work at a strip club or in adult films or be models if they want to?

            FYI, a hooters waitress usually gets around 3/hr plus $700 to $1500 a week in tips working full time. $75k a year (and pretty much no server claims all their cash tips) isn’t bad for wearing booty shorts and showing some cleavage.

            Then theres that hooters girl all over tik tok that was making $4,000 a week in tips in Massachusetts.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              So if a job pays well, it’s okay for the woman being paid to be demeaned and sexually harassed?

              I’m sure they’ll love hearing that in the C-suites.

              • ColeSloth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                You think it’s demeaning for a waitress to show off her tits and ass in order to take more of your money?

                You really want to get in on it, just do yourself a Google search on “feminism and exotic dancing” and you’ll find a bunch of very mixed results, with very few feminists actually saying strip clubs or places like hooters shouldn’t exist, even if some of them don’t agree with women who choose to work at those places, they still support a woman doing the job if they choose to.

                  • ColeSloth
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Assume you will be sexually harrased doing the job. Fine. Did you know you were likely to be sexually harassed in the job?

                    If a hooters waitress complains about a customer it’s standard that hooters will ban the customer and that most customers don’t sexually harass the staff, but that doesn’t make the sexual harassment that happened just disappear. It just means the same person isn’t likely going to continue doing it.

                    So the real question is “Why is it your decision to decide if someone else would exchange being sexually harassed in exchange for money?” Do you think the women there are stupid? Do you think they aren’t allowed to make that decision? Why are you deciding this on behalf of another person? Do you think you know better than they do? The bottom line is “my body my choice”. Stop being someone else’s keeper.