Ensuring those who choose to bathe in AI slop will never be washed clean.
It’s also a great overview of company’s or services you might want to avoid. But it’s not just negative, it also shows who is taking a stand against “AI”.
Ensuring those who choose to bathe in AI slop will never be washed clean.
It’s also a great overview of company’s or services you might want to avoid. But it’s not just negative, it also shows who is taking a stand against “AI”.
No unfortunately Torvalds is firmly in the “its just a tool” camp.
How does that change the issue that they are not even remotely equivalent?
If they didn’t want to be compared to a pig, why did they go into the pigsty and roll around in the mud? One legitimises the use of AI, the other invests in it - both are on the side of Sam Altman and his ilk.
The page already seems to try to be more nuanced than “shit” and “non-shit”, so it is valid to ask why two people get the same rating. But they don’t explain themselves anyway so this is futile.
One is using it for his open source personal side project, the other is promoting and financing AI
If the world used AI like torvald did, it would already be better
hot take: i mean i agree “its just a tool” but a pretty unethical one tbh