• nuke@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    ·
    9 months ago

    All US aircraft carriers are nuclear powered so no more burning fossil fuels. Environment = Saved 🌱

    • Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      I remember reading about nuclear powered shipping vessels being pitched a few years ago.

      • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        9 months ago

        The problem is that most countries don’t have a port to accept a nuclear vessel and don’t want one in their country.

      • Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        lol, there actually was a few, but that is back in ye old days. 1968 - Otto Hans. 1972 - Mutsu. 1988 - Sevmorput (only one still running - but planned decomission is apparently in 2024)

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well, they still have a ton of greased up machinery below deck and they still need to properly store and dispose of bilgewater, so not perfect by any measure, but still way better than any other type of shipping.

  • PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    I have an idea. I know it sounds far fetched, probably won’t work but hear me out. What if they put large poles on ships and hung a big canvas from each of them? The wind could blow against these, generating free thrust and it can make the ships go faster. Wonder if anyone’s ever tried that before.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      But what about the oil companies who make massive profits selling the worst, bottom of the barrel, shit-tier bunker oil to cargo ship operators because regulations don’t exist on international waters? Won’t someone think of the oil companies?

      • Wodge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Won’t someone think of the oil companies?

        I will, and my thoughts are below.

        spoiler

        Fuck you Oil companies. Fuck you up the ass, with a spanner, sideways.

        • Kaliax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          👆 This guy is my favourite* British? person on Lemmy. Called their father a God damned ‘melt’ and shit, and that God damned name! Lol, yeah Wodge, fuck 'em with whatever the fuck a spanner is – I’m with you!

    • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m sure a ship that can do that will be able to carry at least 1 shipping container, maybe 2 if they’re really light. Should be perfect.

      • flathead@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        Published Feb 19, 2023 12:37 PM by The Maritime Executive

        Sailing cargo ships are making a genuine comeback. Japanese bulk carrier MOL is operating a wind-assisted ship. American food giant Cargill is working with Olympic sailor Ben Ainslie to deploy WindWings on its routes. Swedish shipping company Wallenius is aiming for Oceanbird to cut emissions by up to 90%. The French start-up Zephyr & Borée has built the Canopée, which will transport parts of European Space Agency’s Ariane 6 rocket this year.

        https://maritime-executive.com/editorials/sailing-cargo-ships-are-making-a-genuine-comeback

        • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sure, wind assisted, not driven. They’re getting a bit of fuel savings from the sails rather than operating purely on wind.

          • MachineFab812
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            At 90% fuel savings, its the ICE engines doing the assisting. Think about it.

            • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              That’s their aim. I aim to own a fully electric solar powered yacht to live on in the Caribbeans. Doesn’t mean I’ll ever achieve it. Best realistic values I’ve seen were closer to 30% fuel reduction.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          How do the French always manage to come up with project names that sound like gourmet food dishes?

    • datendefekt@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      There are actually a few cargo ships using Flettner Rotors. They can’t completely power the ship - they require a bit of power themselves for the rotation - but they can noticeably offset fuel consumption.

  • Philharmonic3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hey just wanted to make sure everyone knows: there’s a cargo ship behind the carrier. This is an illusion.

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    If they’re following environmental regulations on bilgewater then I’m actually pretty stoked about this.