• FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Bridge Diodes current regulation are considered physics? I mean, yeah, but about as much as any other science field, right?

    • NeatNit
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s electrical engineering if anything

        • NeatNit
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Site, but that’s like saying “writing is an application of language”. The profession of writing is immensely different from the profession of inventing or studying a language. And the profession of electrical engineering is substantially different from the profession of studying electrical phenomena. There’s certainly overlap but it’s different fields.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        So you’re saying Electronics is Electromagnetics is Physics?

        In that case Biology is Chemistry is Physics and therefor Medical Doctors have degrees in Physics. If you feel like fighting me I will await you out back.

        • Dabundis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          First of all, yes - Electromagnetics is a branch of physics. James Maxwell was a physicist.

          Second - Electromagnetics is not electronics. Electronics is a field that applies electricity and magnetism to make useful things.

          • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah but Electromagnetics is the DEEP magic behind electronics.

            You could, if you wanted, use quantum mechanics and electromagnetic field theory to do circuit design. But unless you’re building quantum computers or doing simple circuit analysis and wanted a real challenge applying Kirchhoff’s Laws, there’s no need.

            So you can use the simplified electronics model where the current (and therefore primary charge carriers) is positive.

            Source: I am an electronics wizard engineer.

          • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Electronics is a field that applies electricity and magnetism to make useful things.

            No, That’s electrical engineering.

            Electronics is specifically the study and application of devices whose properties are determined by the charge carriers themselves (the electrons), ie. band gap semiconductors.

            Whether it’s science (physics) or engineering (EE) depends on why you are doing whatever you are doing. Understand stuff? Science. Make stuff that does stuff? Engineering.

            Of course, there’s a lot of bleed and cross pollination on the bleeding edge. This is known as the science/technology feedback loop.

            • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Dude, I’m sitting right now in front of a building full of people that basically study PN junctions for a living. If I tell them diodes are not physics they will be very upset.

              • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Sorry to upset the analogue stereo repair shop but you’re not exactly Stephen Hawkings, okay?

                • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Right now I’m standing in front of the building, so I’m definitely not Stephen Hawkings. Also I’m not dead.

                  Also also, Hawkings was talented, but not a solid state physicist.

                  If you want to troll here, you need to up your physics game. At least pick a relevant dude from the scores of Nobel prize winners my discipline has brought forth in the last fifty years or so.

                  YOU ARE NOT RANDOM TV SCIENCE GUY I’VE HEARD OF doesn’t work here.

                  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I feel like “How dare you compare me to a paraplegic” sounded better in your head.