• Sylveon@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Preparation purist” is wrong. You don’t boil the tea, you steep it in hot water. For some teas, like black tea, you usually boil the water before pouring it over the tea, but other types of tea use water that isn’t as hot (e.g. around 70-80°C for green tea).

    Also, if you actually want to be an ingredient purist, tea must be made from the leaves of Camellia sinensis (or a closely related species).

    • C126@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      You hit the issue, theyre confusing tea, a specific plant, with an infusion. Herbal tea is more correctly called an herbal infusion. Tea is a type of herbal infusion.

      • bitwaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        From https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbal_tea :

        … most dictionaries record that the word tea is also used to refer to other plants beside the tea plant and to beverages made from these other plants. In any case, the term herbal tea is very well established and much more common than tisane.

        Furthermore, in the Etymology of tea, the most ancient term for tea was 荼 (pronounced tu) which originally referred to various plants such as sow thistle, chicory, or smartweed, and was later used to exclusively refer to Camellia sinensis (true “tea”)

        • pseudo@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think the confusion come from the fact that in many languages and cultures the name for tea and plant infusion is the same. Tea is name plant infusion because it is among the go to infusion if no plant is mention. But then in these language the name for “herbal infusion” or “herbal tea” does not contain the name of the specific plant “tee”. This or the languages got it wrong. Yes, I go that far.

    • Remy Rose@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      I came to say the same thing about Camellia sinensis, thinking “am I about to be more of a tea purist than is even encapsulated in this chart?” So I’m glad somebody else got there first lol

    • lugal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve been to a workshop about green tea recently and you can prepare it with any water temperature. You can make it with cold water, it just takes longer. You can even place ice cubes into the can, put tea leaves on top and let them melt

          • Censored@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Sure, if you think preparation and ingredients don’t matter. Enjoy a hot, steaming, cup of Saturn.

            • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Why do you think that the Chinese way is the only way to prepare authentic tea? It’s so weird dude. We have an ancient tea tradition in India. That’s my point. That a purist might think this method as the proper way too. And it’d be just as valid.

              • Censored@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                It’s not weird at all. China invented tea (Camellia sinensis). The cultivation techniques, the drying and fermenting, and the brewing techniques for various types of black, white, green, and oolong tea. They named it, too. Both “tea” and “chai” are derived from the Chinese word for tea.

                Tea wasn’t cultivated in India until the nineteenth century, when it was introduced by colonial British who literally stole tea plants and seeds from China in an act of corporate espionage. At that point in time, China had been cultivating tea for multiple millennia, and exporting it around the globe for several hundred years. India initially produced CTC (cut, tear, crush) tea on colonial plantations for export, only later (in the 1900s) selling tea to the domestic Indian market, when the practice of adding CTC black tea to masala chai took off in India.

                What’s weird is that you’ve bought into some kind of alternate history where India invented tea.

                • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  I’m not the one who’s trying to change history here. We know that the Chinese have the oldest recorded tea consumption. Doesn’t make that the only valid way of doing it. It’s like saying that there’s only one authentic way to cook a potato, which is whatever the first person did with it.

                  And about whatever you said about tea being a new thing in India, it’s not accurate. It was first mass produced after the British came. But it actually goes back quite a bit. Camellia sinensis var. assamica is actually indigenous to the Assam region of India, and not “stolen from the Chinese”. Some think that some tribes in India (Singpho, Khamti) have been consuming tea from at least the 12th Century, though they had a different name for it. Some (A Revision of the Genus Camellia by Robert Sealy) think it goes back further, but idk about that.

                  But honestly, that’s not even the point. Why did you even feel the need to type this comment? Even if it was a 200 old tradition, that’s a pretty long time. And it should be accepted as a valid way of brewing. I’m not even disputing anything. I simply pointed out that there are alternative traditions. That the world isn’t fucking black and white. Seriously dude, when did I say anything that claimed that Indians invented tea? This isn’t twitter, no need to do this shit here.

    • pseudo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It depends of the kind of tee your using. Once I bought the wrong type of turkish tea and next thing I now I’m boiling my tea during month so I don’t drink a slighty darker version of hot water.

    • Censored@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Thank you. I am horrified that I had to scroll past a discussion of “is pho tea”? to get here. The so-called purist has never even made a proper cup of tea! So obviously pho is NEVER tea, since stock is extensively boiled.

  • dinkusmann@feddit.rocks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Actually ingredient purist should be “tea must be made from tea leaves (Camellia sinensis)”. Black and green tea both come from the same plant. There are people who will tell you that chamomile is a “herbal infusions” and not tea because it comes from a different plant.

    • GTG3000@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      If it’s not made of tea, it’s not tea. It’s an infusion.

      It’s extra annoying to me because in my first language there’s separate words for “tea-tea” and “some boiled herbs-tea” that are commonly used, but thanks to lazy translation people are beginning to call everything “tea”.

    • Buglefingers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      If it doesn’t come from the Camellia sinensis region of France it’s not real tea, just sparkling leaf water

    • pseudo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      That is why I’m an ingredient purist. And I should add that Chamomile is an herbal infusion. No quote needeed. Don’t offer me tee if your want to serve me some chamomile. Don’t offer me tee either if you want to serve me hot water and present me an assortiment of plant a small bag. Tell me your going to serve hot water and I will chose what I drink.

      And to keep the rant going in french “herbal tea” does not even have the “tee” word in it. So it is even more frustrating when someone offer you tee and you end up with some random “tisane” *rolling his eyes*

      • Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I guess I’ll just offer you nothing then and instead ask you to leave? ¯\(ツ)

    • recarsion
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is my stance as well, but for simplicity’s sake I still call them herbal tea, fruit tea etc. It’s technically not tea but the name is just set at this point, like how king cobras are technically not cobras but that’s just their name now so whatever.

  • psilotop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s only tea if it’s made from the tea region of the plant. Anything else is sparkling suspension

  • ZMoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    Saturn is a mixture of gases. It has a solid rocky/hydrogen core surrounded by a layer of liquid hydrogen/helium. You could argue that this intermediate liquid layer might have solid particulates, and this would agree with the definition, but overall Saturn is too complicated to be classified this way. A better extreme example would be something like Earth’s oceans.

      • ZMoney@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        An AI would give a generic definition of Saturn and a generic definition of tea and then say something irrelevant like “scientists disagree about the exact composition of Saturn’s core”

  • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    except… with “pure” tea you don’t consume the original ingredient. (eating tea leaves or coffee grounds? eeww.)

    pho, etc you do. ergo, not tea.

  • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    So because i make cold berry tea in summer and think coffee is a tea too, i’m a “crude oil is tea” sort of guy? 🤨

  • Censored@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m sorry, but BOILING? You do not BOIL tea leaves unless you are an absolute heathen. You may pour just-off-the-stove, formerly boiling water over black tea leaves, making the tea about 210 degrees Fahrenheit. But you do NOT put allow water with tea leaves in it to BOIL unless you are seriously deranged.

    • Routhinator@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah this. Biggest mistake most people that hate tea make is they dont bother learning that tea has specific temps for brewing depending on the leaves and that pouring boiling water off the stove on it will make most teas bitter.

      Many teas are best at 85-90C, just off the boil.