The French government is considering a law that would require web browsers – like Mozilla’s Firefox – to block websites chosen by the government.

    • Squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      On one hand, yeah

      On the other hand, I’m scared about the day when someone who is tech literate gets into government and tries to push stuff like this

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t they just put a metal box with a guard around the entire internet?

      It is just a black box with a blinking light anyway.

      Although the guard might get tired from climbing the stairs of the Elizabeth tower every day.

  • jsdz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firefox being free software, it wouldn’t make much sense for them to try and do something like this. So obviously we know that Mozilla would never go along with such an absurd law and start doing censorship on behalf of France. … right, Mozilla? Slightly strange that you didn’t say so?

      • sab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess it cannot be completely enforced. What they can do, however, is to say that Firefox is illegal in France unless it complies with their unjust laws.

        Mozilla could either choose to comply and release a French version of Firefox with government mandated fixes, or decide not to comply and probably block firefox.com from being accessible from France. This would make it harder for French users to find an alternative browser, making even more people will stick to the pre-installed Chromium based one.

        In general it’s just not a good thing when open source software becomes illegal, no matter how hard the laws might be to implement.

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would it be mozzilas responsibility to make their website unaccesible in france rather then that being the responsibility of french isp?

          If north Korea puts up an obscure law that says all sites are banned from using english does that give them grounds to sue any sites that didn’t think of blocking them specifically?

        • eterps@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          This would make it harder for French users to find an alternative browser, making even more people will stick to the pre-installed Chromium based one.

          Sad as it is, I think this is the optimal solution when it goes through. A lot of EU countries are against monopolies (France is not an exception), this way they would realize they are enforcing a monopoly and singular dependency.

          • BubblyMango@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They dont consider chromium based browsere a monopoly because there are over 10 different ones from different companies. The fact they are all chromium behind the scenes and all comply with google’s bullshit standards doesnt matter to them.

          • sab@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree. If you give in to laws like these you have already lost; people will just accept their freedom being stripped away piece by piece, and government control of software will be the new normal. If on the other hand we reach a point where Firefox is illegal in France, it should be obvious to anyone and especially those involved in competition law that something is not right.

            France is on a bad spree lately, and honestly they need all the bad publicity they can get. I hope this backfires for them.

      • hansl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The software can be open source, the product is branded and published.

    • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope that it would only be the “Frensh Version” of Firefox that implements this and that at least everone outside of France would get a version without this crap. This would then of course, be available to Frensh people to. Hopefully crap laws like this get stoped… lets see

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would work for 95% of browser users, who will not know that they can use a fork of Firefox because they have no idea what that means.

  • benpo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why forcing the browsers? Couldn’t they just make a law for ISPs to block specific domains?

    • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its nothing to do with the right wing and everythiny to do with authoratarianism. Left wing authoratarians hate freedom just as much. They just usually attafk different targets.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because they see the freedom of people who aren’t like them as an abridgement of their freedom to force everyone to be like them.

    • Cam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why do right wingers hate freedom so much?

      What? Am I on crazy pills? This has nothing to do with polticial leaning. Its man VS big gov.

        • Cam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A globalist leaning. Macron if I recall comes from big money in the financial world. The do not have a leaning poltically, they are amoral, dark triad.

  • bahmanm@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Do you not know my son, with how little wisdom the world is governed?” 🤷‍♂️

  • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How the fuck could a law like that possibly be enforceable? Mozilla should just tell them to go fuck themselves, offer alternative IPs so people can get around country-wide DNS blocks, and then go about their day. Who cares what some spineless country wants?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what’s happened in other countries that have tried to implement this. Unless you want to basically go the Chinese route and ban all exterior access it’s an utterly unenforceable law. Which I am sure they would have been told if they had bothered to consult anybody with domain knowledge.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whelp, I signed in the dumbest way possible. Signed under the name Lupine Arsène. Only thing I regret is not putting the country as France to complete the dumb joke.

    • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe a decentralized encrypted takedownsafe and possibly anonymous internet protocol won’t care what they think?

      I mean we have to try IMO.

      • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good luck with that. The only such protocol I know of that people actually use is Tor, and it’s a US government honey pot.

            • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              And if you bothered to invest a fifth of a third of a quarter of the energy you’re putting into being defensive into helping solve the problem, we wouldn’t be here.

                • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  And I took your comment as immature negativity only to find out it’s jealous whining at best and concern trolling and forum sliding at worst.

                  You’re not going to win the argument. All you’re going to do is make things worse. You’re not going to stop us from supporting Firefox in their time of need, or France’s, or the Internet. It’s just not gonna happen.

                  So go find something better to do with your free time and let the adults talk.

  • Lazycog@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Signed. Although I wanted to ask if it has any value if it was signed by someone from outside of France/not French?

    • Jomn@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even petitions from within France don’t have any value. Our current government doesn’t really care about this kind of action (or any type of action, actually).

  • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe this is a stupid question, but how does France have jurisdiction to force features into a web browser made by an American company?

    • Waltzy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are free to try and compel them and Mozilla would be free to stop operating in France.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        And then when in France, I can simply use some other open source browser. This kind of shows how dumb politicians are. Next up? You shouldn’t be able to access dangerous software like GitHub, let’s block that!