Assuming nobody else is at fault

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    276
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’ll fix everyone at the ER.

    But you get a ridiculous bill, then likely “settle” for a much lower amount of if you’re truly pennyless, you just never pay it and eventually the hospital gives up and uses it as a tax write off.

    It’s a shit system

    • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      118
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’ll also wreck your credit, and if you’re unlucky they’ll sell your debt off to debt collectors to harass you and your family. Even if they’ve died. And then the truly desperate will sometimes commit heath insurance fraud making the system even more immensely fucked for everyone except for the hospitals and insurance companies

      • Foggyfroggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not exactly. Medical debt is different compared to retail debt like credit cards. It still sucks but the rules are different to protect people at least a little bit.

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep. Medical debt is often not calculated into your credit score by the credit agencies, either, though not in all cases. Or if it is calculated in, it is heavily weighted against so it doesn’t cause much damage.

          And it makes sense. Credit score is supposed to be a judge of your credit worthniess based on your history seeking credit and repaying debts. While medical debt is legitimate debt, it isn’t credit seeking behavior in the way an auto loan is. You didn’t choose to take it on, it would be inaccurate to take a trip to the ER into account when determining your credit seeking habits.

          • nocturne213@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            I sustained a workplace injury (working on a movie set) and the production company never filed the paperwork, so their insurance would not cover me. I refused to pay the bill and it showed up on my credit report and caused issues for three years. Eventually i found my wrap gift from movie and inside the set medic had put a copy of the paperwork. I scanned it and emailed it to the hospital and within 72 hours it was taken care of and like a month later it was off my credit report. (Time frames may be off as this transpired in 2015)

          • droans@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            About five or six years ago, most creditors started using a different FICO model which doesn’t include medical debt. Basically, the idea is that being unable to pay medical debt says very little about how well you can handle debt.

            There are also models that don’t consider student loans, but those aren’t used as often.

          • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s somewhat in the credit agencies best interests to ignore or heavily discount medical debt. Because so many people have it, and not by choice, to destroy everybody’s credit rating because of medical debt would decimate a significant portion of the country’s ability to get credit. That would have a domino effect on a great many things, and cause enough of an issue that it’s likely there would be further regulations on the credit agencies.

            Remember, businesses want customers, they just want customers they can trust to pay the debt. Credit agencies using medical debt to decimate an otherwise decent credit rating denies those businesses a perfectly trustworthy customer.

            They absolutely should be regulated more, though, regardless of how they handle medical debt now. Frankly I think a great step would be if we extended HIPAA laws so that the credit agencies literally cannot receive any information about medical debt whatsoever.

        • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mind you, that is a recent change and there are some places that still illegally do so and it is a pain in the ass to get it removed.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The big story in my city a while back was a shitty debt collector that stole money from a guy’s bank account.

        ‘It is like robbery’: A debt collector wrongly wiped out an Oregon man’s entire bank account

        According to court records, the debt collector said Salazar owed money for treatment at Providence Portland Medical Center in late 2007 and 2008. Providence claimed it sent 26 billing statements and six financial assistance applications to the home address provided by the patient. The unpaid bills for six emergency room visits originally totaled $4,750 but have since ballooned to more than $14,000 after costs, fees and interests associated with the debt collection.

        Salazar tried explaining to Professional Credit Service that he didn’t have the money to pay, but a customer service representative seemed unsympathetic.

        “They did not care if my brother is sick and this is going to put us on the street,” explained Salazar. “They did not care.”

        In April, Salazar filled out court papers challenging the garnishment. It temporarily froze his bank account, preventing the debt collector from taking any more money. At the same time, it kept Salazar from accessing much needed funds, including his paycheck, which is electronically deposited into the account.

        https://www.kgw.com/article/news/investigations/debt-collector-wrongly-wiped-out-bank-account/283-01681963-8fe0-4b44-a57f-c076e4521b22

      • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like a lot of people ignore collection agencies when they advise others to “just not pay.” Yeah you could probably get away without paying, but you and your entire family will be harassed nonstop. There’s been few things more chilling to me than a stranger calling me out of the blue with my sister’s name and info telling me to get her to settle up (thankfully just a small amount).

    • ritswd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been telling people that the notion that the ER lets poor people die in the US is false; instead, they make you wish you did.

    • nothacking
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Part of the reason it’s like this is because insurance companies try their very hardest to avoid paying, but that means you have to do the same if paying yourself.

  • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ER patches you up, you get a large bill, you declare bankruptcy, life goes on.

    The question you should ask is, what happens if you have no insurance and you develop a serious chronic illness.

    • gressen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      How does “life go on” with a bankruptcy and health issues?

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        The point of a bankruptcy is to move on. You start off at zero again, but you can start building up assets again.

        As far as the health issues go, because of the bankruptcy and the ACA you probably qualify for medical care under one of the programs.

        Yeah, you get fucked over pretty good. Life goes on because you’re not dead. But everything you had, everything you worked for, is gone. You are left literally with life, not with your life.

        • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          For all its faults the ability for an individual to declare bankruptcy sounds like a rather good thing in the US and something we don’t have in Finland. Granted we don’t have that level of healthcare bills either but if you somehow get youself millions into debt here it sticks with you your whole life.

          • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            You still have to pay for the bankruptcy. I don’t know exactly how it works because I’ve never declared it, but it’s not free to go bankrupt either. In American Capitalism they will screw the poor people every way they can.

          • droans@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            There has to be some form of bankruptcy, isn’t there?

            When you declare bankruptcy, you’re basically going to the courts and saying, “Look. I don’t have the money or the income to cover all my debts. I need help.” If the court agrees, they’ll force all your creditors to come to the table to negotiate.

            The court determines what assets you can keep and determines the best way to divvy up what’s left. Usually you keep your house, car, and basic necessities but that can vary. Some states don’t protect the house or car but even then the court will consider if it’s cheaper or better for you to keep either of those than to go rent a new house and take alternate transportation.

            Then they look at your income and decide what you can afford to pay over time. If your income is too low, they may consider all your debts settled at that point. Otherwise, they may set up a payment plan for so many years and consider you even after that.

            Medical debt is the number one reason for bankruptcy. To twist the knife a bit, people who have large medical bills are often in a physical condition that makes it hard to work. About 2/3 of all bankruptcies, or 530,000 families annually, cite their medical bills when filing. After that is mortgage debt (45%), living beyond their means (44.5%), providing help to friends and family (28.5%), student loans (25.5%), and divorce (24.5%).

            • Yosituna@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              “ student loans (25.5%)”

              This seems odd to me because bankruptcy doesn’t currently get rid of student loans (which is completely wtf, but that’s another issue); maybe the student loan payments got so onerous that they got into other debt?

              • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Federal student loans have exceptions to bankruptcy. Private student loans are subject to normal bankruptcy proceedings–much though they may imply they are not.

      • jimbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        My parents went bankrupt like 4 times and it never seemed to make any difference to them. They’d just move on with life and have new credit debt racked up within a few months.

    • AdamHenry
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      For some, it can be an unbearable long and leasurely spin around the drains perimeter.

  • uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Emergenty rooms in hospitals are legaly required to help all patieints, so you would recieve care. Usually until you are able to leave the hospital. You would not receive followup care without going to the emergecy room, or paying cash. You would be billed for all services, usually at a higher rate than insured patients

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      What kind of care is the question. Often times stabilize and terf em is the name of the game.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My wife worked in the ER for a few months and had to change departments because of a mental breakdown.

        Understaffed, abused, and a huge chunk of people who are in the ER are desperate and came there as a last resort because of our fucked up healthcare system.

        Not to mention the unstable. Say what you want, but I can count a dozen times where patients threatened to harm my wife for providing care.

  • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If someone calls an ambulance and you’re unconscious they will take you the hospital for treatment. You will be responsible for the bill. Including the thousands of dollars for the ambulance ride.

    And no, even though you were unconscious and not able to consent to treatment willingly you will still be responsible for the bill. There are ways of dealing with it, but one accident is all it takes for a ruined credit score for some people. It is as fucked up as it sounds.

    There are ways of waiving bills, getting financial assistance etc but it’s a total nightmare dealing with hospital billing departments

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Something nobody else has mentioned her eis that even if a hostpital is required to provide care regardless of your insurance, in practice you’re not unlikely to get a lower standard of care if you have no insurance or even if you have insurance that’s seen as “inferior” like Medicaid.

    Folks without insurance or with “lesser” insurance tende to be poorer. More likely to be seeking pain meds to use recreationally. More likely to be disabled, overweight, etc. More likely to be racially discriminated against or, if white, seen as “white trash”. So, having no insurance or inferior insurance itself may get you written off as “probably lying” or otherwise somehow undeserving of the same level of care.

    And if that’s an issue for life-threatening injuries, it’s… probably much more so an issue for more routine kinds of medical care. It’s literally not even an option to self pay in some cases. And I don’t just mean because it’s so expensive. Even if you did say “I don’t have insurance, but my bank account has $100 million in it and I can use my debit card,” you may be told you’re not allowed to self pay.

    Poor people without insurance are often sent to alternative care facilities specifically for poor people without insurance. And as you might expect, those places are often very understaffed. So you can expect longer wait times and more rushed care.

    Poor people without insurance also often don’t get treated early when a problem isn’t a huge deal for fear of accruing medical debt. So they’re also more likely to end up unexpectedly needing a trip to the ER because that minor infection that, had they gotten it treated a week ago, would have been taken care of with a round of antibiotics has now spread to some much more vital organ.

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Folks without insurance or with “lesser” insurance tende to be poorer. More likely to be seeking pain meds to use recreationally.

      Do you have a source for this? This sounds wrong, pain pills are rich/middle income people drug as I perceive it. You can’t really get hooked up on pills if you never got them by a doctor first.

      • GillyGumbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are definitely pill mills in the poorer parts of town. And usually poor populations receive Medicaid, which will typically pay for the stuff. Just anecdotal evidence as a pharm tech in a rough part of town during college, but after a while we had to actually stop taking scripts for most pain meds (still got a ton of people using trazadone and stuff, though) because the pharmacist just didn’t think it was worth his license if the scripts were tied back to a pill mill.

    • Can_you_change_your_username@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Adding to this, there is no requirement that hospitals ensure that you are safe when they release you from their care so sometimes people who can’t pay for care and have dementia, uncontrolled or poorly controlled mental health issues, or are otherwise vulnerable get left at the nearest bus stop. It even makes the news sometimes because someone got dropped off only wearing a hospital gown at night in winter.

      Edit to add link to an example: https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/11/health/baltimore-hospital-patient-video-bus-stop-trnd/index.html

      • CrackaAssCracka@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t speak for every hospital since I’ve only worked at a few but this is rare. Some places might still be doing it, dumping people who can’t be placed or don’t have insurance, but EMTLA was put in place to combat that stuff and the lawsuit and probably fines would make this a bad move. We’ve kept people where I work for months because we can’t place them or psych won’t take them. At minimum they’re going to a nursing home.

      • TwoGems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Love how the CEO pretends to care about what happens. The executives are the reason it does.

        • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Well, we never told them to make that the policy. We simply decreased wages and staffing enough that it was the natural conclusion to our decisions.”

    • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The having money to pay for something and being turned down is such nonsense. I’ve run into something similar with some procedures I need done. Place would let people without insurance self pay, I have insurance but the wrong kind, they were apparently legally required to bill my insurance but they couldn’t. So I was denied service entirely even though I could have paid in full out of pocket. I spent two months getting my insurance to negotiate a contract with them but by then I was/am running into a time constraint and had to switch where I’m going to be an out of state place that can do the same thing but faster. Things are so broken over here.

  • Squirrel_Patrol@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I was younger and made next to nothing, I ended up in the emergency room with a bill I couldn’t possibly afford to pay. I called up the billing dept and told them about my financial situation and they told me to contact Health Quest so I qualify for a discount. It was relatively easy and not only did it erase my previous debt but it gave me a 0% liability for any hospital fees for the next 6mos. The funny thing was that the hospital ended up selling my my debt to collections by that point so every time they called id fax them a copy of a letter and id never hear from them again and after a few times of them selling this debt to other collectors it just got dropped. This was in upstate NY in like 2010 so YMMV.

    • droans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      It can vary heavily like you’re saying. By law, all hospitals must treat all patients who arrive at the ER.

      Most hospitals have programs so they can provide care for those who can’t afford it, though. Usually around 20-25% of their revenue is used to cover those patients.

      If you qualify for Medicaid, they can backdate your enrollment so you’d be covered even before you arrived at the hospital. Coverage can vary, but this usually should cover all medical bills at no cost.

      The big issue usually isn’t people who have no insurance or are too poor. It’s from hospitals treating you while your insurance refuses to pay. Normally this is because the bill was miscoded, but it can also be due to an uncovered treatment, high deductibles and OOP limits, or the insurance just being greedy.

      Sometimes the hospital or doctors can work things out to minimize your bills, other times they can’t.

      A lot of the protections above came about because of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). Before then, there were common horror stories of people who had hundreds of thousands in medical debt because they reached their lifetime maximum coverage - something that’s illegal now. Insurance could (and often would) just tell people they’re on their own from now on because it’s too expensive to keep them alive. Your coverage could be changed whenever the insurance company felt like it. And up until last year, they could make you pay for treatment if an out-of-network doctor decided to pop on by while you’re at an in-network facility.

      • tacosplease@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        That sounds a lot like the death panels we were warned about except this time, the death panels make more money with each denial.

        • droans@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was, but conservatives don’t mind because they were run by the benevolent health insurance companies who never would screw us over 🫠

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    You tell the hospital to pound sand when they send a five or six figure bill. Very few in the US have $20,000 or so just lying around. The hospital knows that, the court knows that, even the latest version of FICO knows that.

    You can ask for an itemized bill, amd usually a bunch of stupid charges go away. You can try and arrange a payment plan.

    But really, after a certain point, it doesn’t matter if the bill is $10,000 or $1,000,000, there’s just no money, and there will not ever be that money, and they can cry wage garnishment until their ears bleed but it almost never happens - because there’s no money.

    • Limit@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      But what happens if someone has a savings and happens to have say $50k in there and then they’re hit with a health issue that incurs a $25k hospital bill? Can they then come after you for payment if you have the money in savings?

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        In that case, yes they could. But things are different for a person who has 50k in savings, I wasn’t talking about them.

      • lemming007@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, you’re punished for saving while those spend all they earned are rewarded. It’s a messed up system.

  • caden@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    In short? Medical debt. Emergency rooms will treat you, and in some cases might offer discounted rates for patients without insurance, but at the end of the day you are still responsible for the bill, however large it may be.

    • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Worth noting that those discounted rates are still significantly higher than what insured patients pay, and astronomically higher than what people in actually sane countries pay.

  • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You go to the hospital and get a bill that puts you into debt for the rest of your life. Maybe you do a crowdfunding campaign to cover part of it

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        And even if you do have insurance, the larger companies are being caught auto denying claims (supposed to be an instance company employed doctor reviewing your case and medical history to make determination on if treatment was medically necessary).

        They deny first and automatically put patients at a disadvantage. If you do have the skill/time to fight, you’ll likely still only get to a point where you partially pay - and most are too polite/afraid to even appeal a denial in the first place (which is exactly what they are counting on).

  • itsyourmom@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    The hospital will keep sending you bills. Every month, and if you don’t pay that or set up a payment plan with them… they absolutely send it to a collection agency. That law agency will hound you all day every day, phone calls… text messages… Mailing threats and lawyer fees on top of the OG bill.

    Eventually, I know from personal experience… they will take you to debtor’s court. Where you sit in a room full of strangers till your name is called. Then you have to prove how poor you are and they can pause the collection efforts for a period of time… or if the judge believes you can afford something… then your court ordered to pay… or else.

  • dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    What happens if I’m a foreigner? Let’s say I travel there as a tourist, break an arm hiking, they put me in plaster. Let’s assume I’m careless and made no travel insurance. Are they going to stop me on the border?

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You get billed, but you can just go home and not pay it. That doesn’t necessarily mean that the issue won’t still be waiting for you if you come back, though. I can imagine a situation where a foreigner left behind substantial medical debt and the State Department refuses to allow them back in. So if you’re a frequent visitor, or need to visit here again in the future, it would be a problem.

      A one-time visit? Fuck it. Go home, back to your more civilized country, and leave it behind.

    • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Someone else will need to answer on the border bit (though I doubt it), but I know from a friend who visited without travel insurance that he did have a bill for something like 30 thousand USD for a broken leg and rib. I think he just never paid it. He’s back in the UK now, and says he’ll never visit here again because of the experience with our hospitals

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, you’ll have no problems going home. But if the collectors are smart, they’ll pursue you in your home country.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Emergency rooms are legally required to provide treatment, and will do so even for non-life-threatening conditions.

    If you don’t have insurance coverage but can pay, you will get a bill. If you can’t pay, in most cases the hospital will write off the debt.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They absolutely will not write off the debt in most cases. They’ll get you on a payment plan.

      • 52fighters@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most hospitals are setup as non-profit entities and use medical debt write-offs to exhibit their charity. In all truth, they intentionally drive their own expenses sky high to increase revenue to astronomical levels so to give executives running these organizations excessively high compensation. These write-offs are just part of the gig.

        • nottelling@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hospitals haven’t been non profit since they were delayed in the early 1980s, and are absolutely structured for profit, with shareholders and conglomerate ownership and everything.

          The medical write offs are exactly that. Tax avoidance.