The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 18 hours agoIt's a matter of perspectivelemmy.worldimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1495arrow-down118
arrow-up1477arrow-down1imageIt's a matter of perspectivelemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 18 hours agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-squareZombiepirate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up186arrow-down1·17 hours agoIt’s a riff on an old meme.
minus-squarefunkless_eck@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up91arrow-down1·edit-215 hours agoalternative interpretation: it’s only possible to be neither right nor wrong on something when the object is physically impossible
minus-squareimaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 hours agoI agree with you on that. But alternatively: humans can only see a portion of the whole reality of a given situation, and that specific angle can often be misleading.
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·15 hours agoI am very pluralistic so I’m ok with many numbers, except one, the singular is where I draw the line!
minus-squarefemboy_bird@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-211 hours agoWhat about 1+(n/∞) where n is a finite integer
It’s a riff on an old meme.
alternative interpretation: it’s only possible to be neither right nor wrong on something when the object is physically impossible
I agree with you on that.
But alternatively: humans can only see a portion of the whole reality of a given situation, and that specific angle can often be misleading.
No, one! Lol
I am very pluralistic so I’m ok with many numbers, except one, the singular is where I draw the line!
What about 1+(n/∞) where n is a finite integer
deleted by creator