Unfortunately, it turns out that chatbots are easily tricked into ignoring their safety rules. In the same way that social media networks monitor for harmful keywords, and users find ways around them by making small modifications to their posts, chatbots can also be tricked. The researchers in Anthropic’s new study created an algorithm, called “Bestof-N (BoN) Jailbreaking,” which automates the process of tweaking prompts until a chatbot decides to answer the question. “BoN Jailbreaking works by repeatedly sampling variations of a prompt with a combination of augmentations—such as random shuffling or capitalization for textual prompts—until a harmful response is elicited,” the report states. They also did the same thing with audio and visual models, finding that getting an audio generator to break its guardrails and train on the voice of a real person was as simple as changing the pitch and speed of a track uploaded.

  • Rikj000
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This post assumes I actually want to waste my time on LLMs, I don’t.

    And even worse, it assumes you want to use the remotely hosted spy-ware variant, not even the less bad, but still a waste of time local variant…

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m afraid to say that you’re not nearly horny enough to understand the temptation. Neither am I, but I saw the prompts people were putting in to a free & unrestricted chatbot a friend of mine was hosting ages back and holy shit. People aren’t doing anything else with these jailbroken AIs, it’s all just blackmail-grade embarrassing fetish stuff. Reams and reams and reams of it, and all of it just the worst written megahorny smut you can imagine.

  • owatnext@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I saw a series of screenshots showing a user threatening to end their own life if the AI did not break the rules and answer their question. There is a chance it is fabricated, but I’m inclined to believe it.

    Edit: forgot to include the AI broke their rules.

    • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      A bit tricky to judge. I’ve also told chatbots that various people, kittens, newborns, … are going to die unless it complies with my request. That I’m God, and the bad one from the old testament, with unlimited wrath. Or that I’m the developer and simply need it to do it for further testing. Sometimes these things work. More often than not they don’t, especially with the more professional tools.

      On the other hand we know there are people in bad situations, turning to chatbots. Could be anything.

      • poweruser@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Geeze, don’t you feel bad lying to them? Like, I don’t actually believe in Roko’s basilisk, but why take the risk?

        I am always exceedingly polite when I talk to machines

        • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          We’re not supposed to antropomorphise AI, so no. But I did not know about Roko’s basilisk, so I think, until you brought it up, I was fine. 😅

          I don’t talk about suicide, though. I don’t think it’s healthy to do it for fun.