• somtwo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    “of the feminine species”

    Uh, do you want to explain to this guy what a species is, or do I have to?

  • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Trans women want to be referred to as just women, and biological women don’t want to be referred to as Cis women, so other than female, what is there?

    I agree that I get the ick from female when referred to by certain men, but at this point, I don’t see another option.

    • bobthened@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Not wanting to be referred to as cis, is just as ridiculous as not wanting to be referred to as straight. It just means “not trans”. The women who don’t want to be referred to as cis are TERFs, so their opinions are irrelevant.

      • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        Is it just as ridiculous as not wanting to be referred to as trans? Why label what something is not rather than what something is?

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The problem is female and women aren’t grammatically equivalent, so you can’t just drop one in place of the other anytime you want. It bugs me when people say woman president. Imagine electing a man president. The correct word in that case is male. You’d be electing a male president. I don’t care about anyone’s politics. I’m just getting tired of people in suits on tv using poor language and being asked to be taken seriously. And I’m not singling out democrats. Republicans adopted that language too. There are people on tv who wouldn’t pass kindergarten telling us what they think will affect GDP.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Meanwhile: males, dudes, guys, homies, fellas, bois, bros, lads, laddie, mates, geezers, chaps, gents, boss, hoss, cheif, buddy, pal, son, sonny, sonny boy, muchacho, hombre, old timer, Mac, Joe…

    “Yeah what’s up?”

    I don’t think we need to cancel Guys and Dolls just yet.

    • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I love that half of these are fully gender neutral terms of endearment in Australia 😂

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Honestly a lot of them start out as or still contextually imply “males” in the US, but can be used gender neutrally as well now too. Like “how you guys doing” vs “hanging out with the guys.”

        • MouldyCat@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It’s interesting isn’t it? “Guys” can include women, and can even be a group of only women, but you can’t talk about a single woman as a guy - “I snogged this gorgeous guy last night”.

          • lunarul@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Using “guys” for a group of only women works only in 2nd person. You can say “I love you guys!” to a group of women, but you can’t say “I was hanging out with the guys” when talking about the same group.

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      As a man who likes fedoras, this stereotype offends me. Sadly, it’s an accurate description most of th etime.

      • kadup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Usually the Redditors wear the fedora without knowing how to pair it correctly with the rest of their outfits, so don’t worry, if you wear a nice attire and a fedora people won’t get you confused with the guy wearing an ahegao t-shirt two sizes too small and cargo shorts.

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      And I can hear it spoken with a lisp that you get when talking with a mouth full of prosthetics. Pfemales

    • boydster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Ooo help me learn today if you don’t mind… Where does this prefix grouping come from?

      Edit: found it, I think: Chinese?

      • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Yeah, what they’re saying doesn’t make much sense logically though.

        Men here is 们, the plural marker for people. Wo (我) is I or me, wo+men (我们) we or us, ni (你) is you, ni+men (你们) is you (plural), ta (他/她/它) is he/she/it, and ta+men (+们) is they.

        Some other variants exists, and there’s specifics on the usage. I also missed the tone markers on the pinyin because they’re a pain to type.

        Anyway I’m not sure what joke or point they were trying to make.

        • socsa@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          They say fluency happens when you make your first cross language pun, so riffing on a mediocre meme feels like halfway there.

      • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Correct; wo, ni, ta are the singular forms I, you, he/she/it. Adding the -men suffix turns it into the plural we/you/they.

        So literally, ‘we’ are ‘women’.