Honestly I’ve done mostly forgot, and with the proliferation of AI technologies and all the typos AI has read from in the training models, I bet AI isn’t always right about this either.

I usually just don’t care anymore, whether the autocorrect puts the apostrophe in or not.

  • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 days ago

    I feel like that one isn’t that hard to remember because “its” stands out as a common exception to the rule for possessive singular nouns.

    “It’s” is a contraction of “it is” while “its” is possessive.

    • NeatNit
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      “its” is comparable to “his” or “her”, not to e.g. “Dave’s”.

      • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I think you meant hers, with an S, but I get your point. Does that mean “it” is/was meant to function as a pronoun?

        Rhetorical question for the pronoun nazis, if I don’t know the sex/gender of a kitten, I’m gonna call it an it. If I don’t know the sex/gender of a human, I’m probably still gonna call it an it.

        See post above, his, hers, and its are linguistically compatible, meaning that him, her, and it must be equally compatible.

        • davidgro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          The obvious issue with ‘it’ as a pronoun for a person (or in my opinion a mammal or other sentient animal) is that it’s literally objectifying them: The main use of ‘it’ is for inanimate objects. Sometimes that’s used for effect, for example calling a pedophile an it. But unless you really dislike a person of nonspecific gender, just call them a them.

          • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Them was originally intended as plural though. When did people decide to jank up the defined language? They/them/those are meant as plural.

            And I might have made a subtle mistake earlier. He/she/it are pronouns, him/her/it as well.

            His/hers/its are possessive pronouns. Can we try to stick to some sort of standard in the language, with clarity and without offense?

            • davidgro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              Singular ‘they’ is centuries old. Apparently even older than singular ‘you’. It’s only recently that people tried to make it a rule that it should only be used as a plural, but really it’s used in natural language as a singular all the time like I did. (Did you notice it in the middle of my previous comment, not just the end?)

        • NeatNit
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          I meant her. Mike and his guitar; Sarah and her violin; The computer and its speakers.

    • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Over the years, I’ve become more and more unsure on that one. I usually have excellent spelling and grammar, but it was so long ago when I learned the difference between its and it’s, that I’ve gradually assumed I’ve seen so many typos over the decades that I just couldn’t remember for sure.