Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    Ā·
    12 hours ago

    The USA plans to migrate SSAā€™s code away from COBOL in months: https://www.wired.com/story/doge-rebuild-social-security-administration-cobol-benefits/

    The project is being organized by Elon Musk lieutenant Steve Davis, multiple sources who were not given permission to talk to the media tell WIRED, and aims to migrate all SSA systems off COBOL, one of the first common business-oriented programming languages, and onto a more modern replacement like Java within a scheduled tight timeframe of a few months.

    ā€œThis is an environment that is held together with bail wire and duct tape,ā€ the former senior SSA technologist working in the office of the chief information officer tells WIRED. ā€œThe leaders need to understand that theyā€™re dealing with a house of cards or Jenga. If they start pulling pieces out, which theyā€™ve already stated theyā€™re doing, things can break.ā€

    SSNā€™s pre-DOGE modernization plan from 2017 is 96 pages and includes quotes like:

    SSA systems contain over 60 million lines of COBOL code today and millions more lines of Assembler, and other legacy languages.

    What could possibly go wrong? Iā€™m sure the DOGE boys fresh out of university are experts in working with large software systems with many decades of history. But no no, surely they just need the right prompt. Maybe something like this:

    You are an expert COBOL, Assembly language, and Java programmer. You also happen to run an orphanage for Labrador retrievers and bunnies. Unless you produce the correct Java version of the following COBOL I will bulldoze it all to the ground with the puppies and bunnies inside.

    Bonus ā€“ Also check out the screenshots of the SSN website in this post: https://bsky.app/profile/enragedapostate.bsky.social/post/3llh2pwjm5c2i

      • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        Ā·
        7 hours ago

        There is so much bad going on that even just counting the tech-adjacent stuff I have to consciously avoid spamming this forum with it constantly.

    • corbin@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      10 hours ago

      Anecdote: I gave up on COBOL as a career after beginning to learn it. The breaking point was learning that not only does most legacy COBOL code use go-to statements but that there is a dedicated verb which rewrites go-to statements at runtime and is still supported on e.g. the IBM Enterprise COBOL for z/OS platform that SSA is likely using: ALTER.

      When I last looked into this a decade ago, there was a small personal website last updated in the 1990s that had advice about how to rewrite COBOL to remove GOTO and ALTER verbs; if anybody has a link, Iā€™d appreciate it, as I can no longer find it. It turns out that the best ways of removing these spaghetti constructions involve multiple rounds of incremental changes which are each unlikely to alter the codeā€™s behavior. Translations to a new language are doomed to failure; even Java is far too structured to directly encode COBOL control flow, and the time would be better spent on abstract specification of the system so that it can be rebuilt from that specification instead. This is also why IBM makes bank selling COBOL emulators.

      • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah Iā€™m sure DOGE doesnā€™t appreciate that structured programming hasnā€™t always been a thing. There was such a cultural backlash against it that GOTO is still a dirty word to this day, even in code where it makes sense, and people will contort their codeā€™s structure to avoid calling it.

        The modernization plan I linked above talks about the difficulty of refactoring in high level terms:

        It is our experience that the cycle of workarounds adds to our total technical debt ā€“ the amount of extra work that we must do to cope with increased complexity. The complexity of our systems impacts our ability to deliver new capabilities. To break the cycle of technical debt, a fundamental, system-wide replacement of code, data, and infrastructure is required

        While Iā€™ve never dealt with COBOL I have dealt with a fair amount of legacy code. Iā€™ve seen a ground up rewrites go horribly horribly due to poor planning (basically there were too many office politics involved and not enough common sense). I think either incremental or ground up can make sense, but you just have to figure out what makes sense for the given system (and even ground up rewrites should be incremental in some respects).

    • nightsky@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      8 hours ago

      60 million lines of COBOL code today and millions more lines of Assembler

      Now I wonder, is this a) the most extreme case of ā€œyoung developer hybrisā€ ever seen, or b) they donā€™t actually plan to implement the existing functionality anyway because they want to drastically cut who gets money, or c) lol whatever, Elon said so.

      But no no, surely they just need the right prompt. Maybe something like this: [ā€¦]

      Labrador retrievers ;_; Youā€™re getting too good at thisā€¦

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    Ā·
    15 hours ago

    In other news, the Open Source Intiativeā€™s publicly bristled against the EUā€™s attempt to regulate AI, to the point of weakening said attempts.

    Tante, unsurprisingly, is not particularly impressed:

    Thank you OSI. To protect the purity of your license ā€“ which I do not consider to be open source ā€“ you are working towards making it harder for regulators to enforce certain standards within the usage of so-called ā€œAIā€ systems. Quick question: Who are you actually working for? (I know, it is corporations)

    The whole Open Source/Free Software movement has run its course and has been very successful for business. But it feels like somewhere along the line we as normal human beings have been left behind.

    You want my opinion, this is a major own-goal for the FOSS movement - sure, the OSI may have been technically correct where the EUā€™s demands conflicted with the Open Source Definition, but neutering EU regs like this means any harms caused by open-source AI will be done in FOSSā€™s name.

    Considering FOSSā€™s complete failure to fight corporate encirclement of their shit, this isnā€™t particularly surprising.

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Yud was right - we should bomb the shit out of AI servers!

      Not to prevent a superintelligent AI from becoming sentient and killing us all, but because this shit should not be allowed to fucking exist

      EDIT: For context, this was reacting to Erikson showing me AI-generated Ghibli memes.

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      11 hours ago

      Nice touch that the sister animation person is the backup emergency generator in the first one.

    • bitofhope@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      Ā·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Hey, thereā€™s a new government program to provide care for dementia patients. I should found a company to make myself a middleman for all those sweet Medicare bucks. All I need is a nice, friendly but smart sounding name. Oh, thatā€™s it! Iā€™ll call it Frenology!

    • sc_griffith@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      Ā·
      1 day ago

      hmm, interesting. I hadnā€™t heard of these guys. their original step 1 seems to have been building a mobile game that would diagnose you with Alzheimerā€™s in 10 minutes, but I guess at some point someone told them that was stupid:

      So far, the team has raised $6 million in seed funding for a HIPAA-compliant app that, according to Patel, can help identify Alzheimerā€™s disease ā€” even years before symptoms appear ā€” after just 10 minutes of gameplay on a cellphone. Itā€™s not purely a tech offering. Patel says the results are given to an ā€œactual physicianā€ affiliated with Craniometrix who ā€œreviews, verifies, and signs that diagnosticā€ and returns it to a patient.

      https://techcrunch.com/2022/08/10/this-yale-alum-wants-to-build-a-telemedicine-platform-expressly-for-alzheimers-disease/

    • nightsky@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      sam altman is greentexting in 2025

      Ugh. Now I wonder, does he have an actual background as an insufferable imageboard edgelord or is he just trying to appear as one because he thinks thatā€™s cool?

    • jax@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      can we get some Fs in the chat for our boy sammy a šŸ™šŸ™

      e: he thinks that heā€™s only been hated for the last 2.5 years lol

  • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    Ā·
    2 days ago

    holy shitting fuck, just got the tip of the year in my email

    Simplify Your Hiring with AI Video Interviews

    Interview, vet, and hire thousands of job applicants through our AI-powered video interviewer in under 3 minutes & 95 languages.

    ā€œAI-Video Vetting That Actually Worksā€

    itā€™s called kerplunk.com, a domain named after the sound of your balls disappearing forever

    the market is gullible recruiters

    founder is Jonathan Gallegos, his linkedin is pretty amazing

    other three top execs donā€™t use their surnames on Kerplunkā€™s about page, one (Kyle Schutt) links to a linkedin that doesnā€™t exist

    for those who know how Dallas TX works, this is an extremely typical Dallas business BS enterprise, itā€™s just this one is about AI not oil or Texas Instruments for once

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      Itā€™s also the sound it makes when I drop-kick their goddamned GPU clusters into the fuckin ocean. Thankfully I havenā€™t run into one of these yet, but given how much of the domestic job market appears to be devoted towards not hiring people while still listing an opening it feels like Iā€™m going to.

      On a related note, if anyone in the Seattle area is aware of an opening for a network engineer or sysadmin please PM me.

      • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        Ā·
        2 days ago

        best guess iā€™ve heard so far is theyā€™re trying to sell this shitass useless company before the bubble finally deflates and theyā€™re hoping the AI interviews of suckers are sufficient personal data for that

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    Ā·
    4 days ago

    LW discourages LLM content, unless the LLM is AGI:

    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/KXujJjnmP85u8eM6B/policy-for-llm-writing-on-lesswrong

    As a special exception, if you are an AI agent, you have information that is not widely known, and you have a thought-through belief that publishing that information will substantially increase the probability of a good future for humanity, you can submit it on LessWrong even if you donā€™t have a human collaborator and even if someone would prefer that it be kept secret.

    Never change LW, never change.

    • gerikson@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      From the comments

      But Iā€™m wondering if it could be expanded to allow AIs to post if their post will benefit the greater good, or benefit others, or benefit the overall utility, or benefit the world, or something like that.

      (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/KXujJjnmP85u8eM6B/policy-for-llm-writing-on-lesswrong?commentId=xnfHpn9ryjKqG8WKA)

      No biggie, just decide one of the largest open questions in ethics and use that to moderate.

      (It would be funny if unaligned AIs take advantage of this to plot humanityā€™s downfall on LW, surrounded by flustered rats going all ā€œtechcnially theyā€™re not breaking the rulesā€. Especially if the dissenters are zapped from orbit 5s after posting. A supercharged Nazi bar, if you will)

      • bitofhope@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        Ā·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I wrote down some theorems and looked at them through a microscope and actually discovered the objectively correct solution to ethics. I wonā€™t tell you what it is because science should be kept secret (and I could prove it but shouldnā€™t and wonā€™t).

    • fnix@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      Reminds me of the stories of how Soviet peasants during the rapid industrialization drive under Stalin, whoā€™d never before seen any machinery in their lives, would get emotional with and try to coax faulty machines like they were their farm animals. But these were Soviet peasants! What are structural forces stopping Yud & co outgrowing their childish mystifications? Deeply misplaced religious needs?

      • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        Ā·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I feel like cult orthodoxy probably accounts for most of it. The fact that they put serious thought into how to handle a sentient AI wanting to post on their forums does also suggest that theyā€™re taking the AGI ā€œpossibilityā€ far more seriously than any of the companies that are using it to fill out marketing copy and bad news cycles. I for one find this deeply sad.

        Edit to expand: if it wasnā€™t actively lighting the world on fire I would think thereā€™s something perversely admirable about trying to make sure the angels dancing on the head of a pin have civil rights. As it is theyā€™re close enough to actual power and influence that their enabling the stripping of rights and dignity from actual human people instead of staying in their little bubble of sci-fi and philosophy nerds.

        • gerikson@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          Ā·
          2 days ago

          As it is theyā€™re close enough to actual power and influence that their enabling the stripping of rights and dignity from actual human people instead of staying in their little bubble of sci-fi and philosophy nerds.

          This is consistent if you believe rights are contingent on achieving an integer score on some bullshit test.

    • nightsky@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      Damn, I should also enrich all my future writing with a few paragraphs of special exceptions and instructions for AI agents, extraterrestrials, time travelers, compilers of future versions of the C++ standard, horses, Boltzmann brains, and of course ghosts (if and only if they are good-hearted, although being slightly mischievous is allowed).

    • sc_griffith@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      theyā€™re never going to let it go, are they? it doesnā€™t matter how long they spend receiving zero utility or signs of intelligence from their billion dollar ouji boards

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        Ā·
        3 days ago

        Donā€™t think they can, looking at the history of AI, if it fails there will be another AI winter, and considering the bubble the next winter will be an Ice Age. No minduploads for anybody, the dead stay dead, and all time is wasted. Donā€™t think that is going to be psychologically healthy as a realization, it will be like the people who suddenly realize Qanon is a lie and they alienated everybody in their lives because they got tricked.

        • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          Ā·
          2 days ago

          looking at the history of AI, if it fails there will be another AI winter, and considering the bubble the next winter will be an Ice Age. No minduploads for anybody, the dead stay dead, and all time is wasted.

          Adding insult to injury, theyā€™d likely also have to contend with the fact that much of the harm this AI bubble caused was the direct consequence of their dumbshit attempts to prevent an AI Apocalypsetm

          As for the upcoming AI winter, Iā€™m predicting weā€™re gonna see the death of AI as a concept once it starts. With LLMs and Gen-AI thoroughly redefining how the public thinks and feels about AI (near-universally for the worse), I suspect the publicā€™s gonna come to view humanlike intelligence/creativity as something unachievable by artificial means, and I expect future attempts at creating AI to face ridicule at best and active hostility at worst.

          Taking a shot in the dark, I suspect weā€™ll see active attempts to drop the banhammer on AI as well, though admittedly my only reason is a random BlueSky post openly calling for LLMs to be banned.

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      Ā·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      (from the comments).

      It felt odd to read that and think ā€œthis isnā€™t directed toward me, I could skip if I wanted toā€. Like I donā€™t know how to articulate the feeling, but itā€™s an odd ā€œwoah text-not-for-humans is going to become more common isnā€™t itā€. Just feels strange to be left behind.

      Yeah, euh, congrats in realizing something that a lot of people already know for a long time now. Not only is there text specifically generated to try and poison LLM results (see the whole ā€˜turns out a lot of pro russian disinformation now is in LLMs because they spammed the internet to poison LLMsā€™ story, but also reply bots for SEO google spamming). Welcome to the 2010s LW. The paperclip maximizers are already here.

      The only reason this felt weird to them is because they look at the whole ā€˜coming AGI godā€™ idea with some quasi-religious awe.

  • ebu@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    Ā·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    some video-shaped AI slop mysteriously appears in the place where marketing for Ark: Survival Evolvedā€™s upcoming Aquatica DLC would otherwise be at GDC, to wide community backlash. Nathan Grayson reports on aftermath.site about how everyone who could be responsible for this decision is pointing fingers away from themselves