I remember reading this somewhere years ago. The idea is that Israel will nuke Paris, Berlin, London, etc, in the event that the west cuts off their support and allows it to be defeated by an enemy force.

Is this just a dumbass conspiracy theory, or is there something to it?

  • Kaplya@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    What? No. First, the US and Europe will never abandon Israel, so this point is moot.

    Second, the US, France and UK have nukes and can retaliate. Instead, Israel is going to nuke the Middle Eastern countries who don’t have nukes. This is why so many of its surrounding countries are extremely hesitant about doing something that might escalate towards an all-out war with Israel. 2 million Palestinian lives is already a lot, but hundreds of millions of lives are also at risk should a nuclear war breaks out in the region.

    And Israel is fast losing this strategic advantage because Russia and Iran just signed a full strategic defense pact last year, which means Iran possessing nukes is only a matter of time.

    If Israel wants to leverage on its strategic position, it’s now or never.

  • American_Badass [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve heard talk about this for a long time, generally called the Samson option, obviously after the biblical figure. Thing is, it just sounds like a “normal” nuclear deterrence strategy of mutually assured destruction, but I know very, very little about it.

    Seymour Hersh has a book about Israel’s nuclear history (called Samson option). I’ve never personally read it, but Hersh is a respected journalist and I’m sure there’s some useful information in it, if you’re interested.

    I don’t understand Israel and nukes anyhow. They’re obviously nuclear armed, but also somewhat ambiguous about that fact. So I don’t know how it functions as a deterrent if it’s a secret.

    • Kaplya@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      Israel keeps its nuclear weapons secret so that the Dimona reactor can skirt IAEA inspection. It is only open for US inspectors and require advanced notice, which renders the inspection useless because they have time to cover up everything in advance. Basically it’s not letting you know exactly how many nukes they have and obfuscates indications of what they intend to do with their nuclear weapons program.

    • CTHlurker [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      Didn’t Isreal get a lot of their nuclear program from straight up stealing blueprints from the American program? Think I remember a few of the insane right wingers on twitter making that point before I blocked them all and Elon deleted my account.

    • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      this isn’t the same thing as the Samson option, which refers to Israel’s willingness to retaliate against an enemy nation which has attacked it. OP’s scenario is a complete fantasy that he picked up from someone whose brain was about a liter too small for their skull.

    • sysgen [none/use name,they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      The difference between MAD and the Samson option, is that in the former you’re only attacking whoever attacked you, while in the former you’re attacking bystanders that refused to intervene on your behalf.

    • webdoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Seymour Hersh is one of the only true Journalists left that isn’t in hiding, constantly moving, prison or bunkered up somewhere. We would never have learned about the war crimes the U.S. committed in Vietnam if it wasn’t for his reporting on the Mai Lai Massacre, or more recently the Nordstream False Flag.

  • Teekeeus [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I’ve heard a variant of this, that the nukes are aimed at every major metropolis in the world so that they’ll bring the entire world down with them

    I don’t believe it though, if nukes fly then I think they’ll just use nukes against whatever opponent they have at the time of use, as with other nuclear powers

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s very unlikely that Israel has enough nuclear warheads or long range delivery platforms to hit very major city on Earth. Nuclear weapons are very expensive to maintain and iirc most of Israeli detergent is submarine based, which in theory means they can hit anywhere on earth given enough time, but in practice means that they only have relatively short ranged missiles and won’t be able to hit any country with a competent ASW net.

  • GaveUp [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m pretty sure they’ve admitted they would obliterate all of France if they were to ever be successfully invaded for the obnoxious and pretentious attitudes they’ve displayed

  • Mindfury [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 months ago

    i mean, while it definitely sounds like some dogshit antisemitic myth, it would be the only cool thing the state of israel ever did if it were true

  • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t think modern nukes are “aimed” in any significant sense of the word. With modern satellites and computers, I seriously doubt nuclear missiles have to rely on flight plans that can’t be altered om reasonable notice.

    If that’s the case, then it really does come down to who’s got their finger on the button at the time.

  • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    A bark with no bite, like the US empire would ever let their European investments be trashed for the pride of some racist Russian settlers

  • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I would interpret this as a narrative intended to excuse and explain Europe and the West’s behaviors. It’s a defense against the idea that they’re monstrous colonizers that actually support and agree with Zionism.

    It also plays into the “actually those Jews over there control everyone else with tricks and threats” antisemitic canards. These two things work together for Euros and white supremacist liberals.