• wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I kind of hate that it isn’t making a bigger point of the artist that made the “piece” in the first place and their incredibly unhealthy relationship with AI.

      The guy was using it as his therapist, experienced what they self label as a psychosis, at some level see that it’s a bad influence on them, despite that used it to make a piece they got put in a gallery, and haven’t actually cut it out of their life. I don’t think it would be entirely unfounded to call it an addiction.

      Someone needs to get the “artist” some actual, licensed psychological help.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree with you completely, however because ChatGPT is $10/month (last I heard?) and a licensed psychologist is circa $120 per 30 min session… I sadly know what most people are going to choose.

        • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I care very little about this particular person, but who allows people that speak like this to become “artists”? There is no way this person has anything actually interesting to say, and if they did, they lack the ability to communicate it, much less through a medium as indirect as art.

  • brown567@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    He was just showing them how real artists feel, with AI chewing up all the art in the world and spitting out garbage