• 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I am terminally online and even I don’t want to engage with someone I know IRL through social media. We don’t need to be on discord or Instagram or Reddit to talk 1 on 1. We can just fucking text. Like on the phone. No, I don’t want to download Kik or whatsapp or any other random, sketchy app. We can text through the phone.

    • Firipu@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Fuck texting like a Neanderthal. Use a modern, and secure app to communicate. WhatsApp as a bottom of the barrel thing (99% of society outside of the US is on it, so it’s the de facto standard) , signal or better if you can.

      • Pohl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nothing makes me smirk like the rest of the world bragging to Americans that they use Facebook to text. Yeah guys, you nailed it. Big win. We’re over here using standard protocols like rubes. I’m sure you get all kinds of security from that free app from Mr Zuckerberg. lol

        • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m all for discrediting Facebook services for better alternatives, but Whatsapp employs End to End encryption by default, while SMS is readable from your ISP and anyone intercepting your conversation.

            • smeg@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Facebook messenger has never claimed to be e2e encrypted

              • MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                “Facebook Messenger offers end-to-end encryption, meaning chats between two users will be visible only on users’ phones and aren’t readable by Facebook or any government entity that makes a legal request to the company. But the option is available only to people using the Messenger app on mobile devices, and messages are encrypted only after users select the option to mark chats as “secret.””

                From their linked article.

                It’s insane to only have E2EE as an opt in feature.

                • smeg@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I guess it’s because they added it later so they can claim to have it while still being able to datamine the average user. Not that insane given that it’s Facebook. I’d say what’s insane is that’s the same as what Telegram does and some people think that’s secure!

                • smeg@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  The comment I replied to wasn’t

                  Fbook Messenger, which is also supposed to be E2EE

            • Firipu@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              When you send sms, you might as well be sending smoke signals. Not as if sms is secure in any modern sense of the word…

          • Pohl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Facebook makes money selling data for advertising. They don’t host and maintain what’s app for the good of mankind. every single thing you send on the app is being harvested for data and you know it. It is decrypted at each end and hovered up for sale to the highest bidder.

            • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Facebook makes money mainly from advertising, yes, which can be done also on Whatsapp and will be in the future.

              While they can still harvest some data from Whatsapp even if conversations are encrypted, my point was that they have no way to read the content of messages you send.

            • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I don’t use Facebook and neither should you. Whatsapp is their only decent product, probably because it was bought when it was already decent.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          You guys use iMessage, a proprietary app from an other big tech company and use it to dismiss the other half of the population.

          You guys aren’t much better.

          • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Ahh yes, iphones, the only devices capable of SMS. /s I guarantee they’re not an iphone owner. They used the word “protocol” and “rubes”. Iphone owners don’t know that non-imessage texting is called SMS.

      • shastaxc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I really don’t care about security of a conversation that goes like:

        “hey wanna hang out on Sunday?”

        “Sure, sounds fun, let’s meet at xxx at yyy pm.”

        • tab@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’d guess the point is rather that women tend to research their potential assailants/murderers/lovers before dates, which is easier to do for people that share their shit on social media.

          • Havald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Right, because murderers share their kills on social media? You can sort out some creeps but those can’t hide it if you text with them for a few days either. I don’t think you’d spot most murderers or rapists by looking through their social media.

            • WldFyre@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Well her vibe check was right about this guy, he uses 4chan, one of the worst possibly social medias lol

              • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Yeah, but id bet money that the dude is an untreated/undiagnosed autist, and they can be really fucken creepy. I know cause I was diagnosed with aspergers at fucking 2, when you have to mask constantly and look for social cues you start to notice the undiagnosed ones.

                If youre curious how I noticed its cause they usually have stronger fixations and are usually a bit off with their body language.

                • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  If youre curious how I noticed its cause they usually have stronger fixations and are usually a bit off with their body language.

                  You mean they actually live their life without pretending to be something they are not? Not everyone who doesn’t mask is undiagnosed, the opposite in fact. People get diagnosed, learn masking is bad, and stop doing it gradually.

                  I can’t believe we have people on lemmy trying to encourage masking.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          No, someone who refuses to use normal modes of communication, is sus.

          I wouldn’t trust someone who refuses to have a cellphone.

            • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Outside of the US? Last 15-20 years…

              But it’s starting to fade even in the US, among teenagers.

              The anon failed to meet the expected social norms for environment he was in. The only difference between this and a guy getting turned down for any other reason is the Anon (and it seems many here) are all butthurt over it.

          • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t understand why; I know a few women who don’t have Instagram (crazy, right) and this simple fact made them interesting to me.