• dependencyinjection
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    4 months ago

    I mean 122,000 out of 60 million isn’t a lot.

    Could likely get 5 million to say banning people based on colour is a good idea, but I don’t agree.

    • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      Only need 500 (out of 40mil) + one MP sign off for the government to legally have to respond in Canada. They don’t have to say yes but they have to officially acknowledge you at least. I was pretty surprised by how low that threshold is.

    • copd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      why are you including infants amd people without the right to vote in your figure?

      there’s less than 48mill who can vote btw

      • dependencyinjection
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        4 months ago

        I read that as the governments response was no. Not that they didn’t respond.

        The government in the UK will respond if 10,000 signatures and will debate in parliament if 100,000 signatures.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          So they’re going to debate it then because it’s definitely over 100,000.

          • dependencyinjection
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            That ain’t a real petition bro. We don’t use comic sans on government sites.