• skuzz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Similar to the theory that The Simpsons made a generation not trust nuclear power.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think 3 mile Island and Chernobyl and Fukushima and Sosnovy Bor and Ibaraki and Forsmark were probably more influential in terrifying the general public about nuclear power.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yeah it’s also people using those incidents for fear mongering. Especially when coal and oil have killed way more people than every nuclear incident combined, including nuclear weapons.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          4 months ago

          The psychological impact of a meltdown versus slow poisoning is important. Similar to how fire bombings were more deadly and destructive than the nuclear bombs were, but the nukes have a bigger impact on us mentally

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve heard people say shit like “after Chernobyl, two fishermen were instantly vaporized and only boots left on the bank!” Like, no, that never happened since it wasn’t an atomic bomb.

          • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            The closest to that were the people on the bridge who were looking at the radiation that died a couple of days after.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Chernobyl showed that an accident could make an entire region unlivable indefinitely, Three Mile Island showed that an accident could happen in the US too

          Nuclear accidents became real. People could no longer trust that all the safeguards and safety culture could prevent it. And the impact of how serious an accident could get outweighs the rarity.

          Or a more objective and dispassionate way to look at it, is the seriousness of any potential accidents caused enough process safeguard to make nuclear power too expensive to be worthwhile

        • grayman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Apparent waste storage issues… If people really knew about all the pollution from fossil fuels, they’d clamor for nuclear power.

      • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s weird that the first one you listed didn’t have any injuries or deaths. I think you might be a victim of that fear mongering, friend

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      That was Three Mile Island and Chernobyl that did that. The Simpsons merely rode a wave that had already crested.