The Republican-controlled House voted Tuesday to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas over the Biden administration’s handling of the U.S.-Mexico border.

The vote marks the first time in nearly 150 years that a Cabinet secretary has been impeached.

House Republicans have spent months investigating the secretary’s actions as they’ve aimed to make immigration and border security a key election issue.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      9 months ago

      Seems like kind of a waste of government time and resources.

      The best way to prove your point that the government is too big and too dysfunctional is to make it too big and too dysfunctional.

    • thesystemisdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      For most, this would reflect poorly at review time. For some, this would invite a dismissal for performance or team cohesion issues. These folks wouldn’t know anything about any of that.

      • nilloc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They saw a name with a silent J and voted with their (racist) gut instincts.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Do something about the border!”

    “Give us funding.”

    “No! Do something about the border.”

    “We can’t without funding.”

    “We said no! DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE BORDER!”

    “What would you have us do?”

    “IMPEACHED!!!”

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    What happens next is it goes to the Senate for a dog and pony show and dies.

    How much do you want to bet that they never would have impeached if he was named “Alex Mayor” and was born here instead of Cuba?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve been saying this from the start- they went after a non-white administration member first and that was a message.

      • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The nomination approval process, where white people and men sailed through while non-white women where put through the wringer with some of them not even making it, also delivered that message.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 months ago

      Same thing that would have happened if this failed this vote, absolutely nothing. This is just the Republicans throwing a temper tantrum to drum up news coverage and to give the talking heads over on Faux News something to yammer on about for a while. Expect to see the headline “Crisis at the Border” used prominently by Faux for a while.

  • SteefLem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Question: does impeachment mean anything, i mean they impeached trump twice i believe and still sat there till the end

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Which is the point of this. They’re running a twice impeached candidate.

        Their purpose is to make impeachment a common, meaningless political stunt.

    • seang96@spgrn.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      The house impeaches with a majority of votes for the members present at the time.

      Next it has to pass the Senate trial. The Senate is 49 Republicans, 48 Democrats, and 3 independent. A couple Democrats also tend to side with Republicans. Since he has been impeached, a trial happens in the Senate and 2/3 majority has to agree to remove from office.

      I’d assume unless someone fucked up really badly and both sides hate them it is very unlikely for a 2/3 majority.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Impeachment is like being charged with a crime; removal is like being convicted. Trump was impeached, but not removed

  • dtc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    this whole situation has all the tact and self reflection as a standard issue Texas driver in their lifted dually rolling coal through a crowded parade (less than zero).

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican-controlled House voted Tuesday to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas over the Biden administration’s handling of the U.S.-Mexico border.

    House Republicans have spent months investigating the secretary’s actions as they’ve aimed to make immigration and border security a key election issue.

    The House Homeland Security Committee has been holding hearings over roughly the last year where Republicans have repeatedly lambasted Mayorkas.

    Witnesses have included an Arizona sheriff, families who have lost loved ones to the fentanyl crisis, experts on constitutional law, and former Homeland Security officials who served under former President Donald Trump.

    U.S. House Republicans say the secretary is violating immigration laws by not detaining enough migrants and by implementing a humanitarian parole program that they say bypasses Congress to allow people into the country who wouldn’t otherwise qualify to enter.

    But the Biden administration and supporters contend that the secretary is dealing with a wildly underfunded and outdated immigration system that only Congress has the power to truly fix.


    The original article contains 1,006 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 83%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!