• Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    Its amazing how fast it’s developing, hard to believe it’s only two years old, yet it seems like yesterday at the same time.

    Fantastic devs!

    • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      Piwigo is more like a shared gallery. Users create album/folders and upload individual photos, which other users can access. Piwigo has poor support for videos and no support for Live Photos.

      Photoprism has only a single user for the free tier. It supports Live Photos and videos, and individual photo uploads. It does facial recognition tagging.

      Immich supports video/Live Photos, facial recognition, and has multiple users, but it expects a full backup/synchronization (not individual photos). Sharing between users is manual, not automatic or permissions-based like Piwigo. Each user has access only to their own backups or shared albums.

      In summary, I think Piwigo is the simplest to set up and use, but it doesn’t do much beyond photos - it’s a simple shared gallery. Photoprism is good and stable, but you have to pay a subscription for multiple user accounts. Immich is rapidly developing, which means things will break, but also it has the most features. My only issue with Immich is that I don’t want to use it as a backup - only as a “best of” shared gallery. While it’s possible with Immich, I would have to maintain an Immich album on my phone, and sync only that, and I would have to set up shares with other users manually.

      • theorangeninja@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Thanks for the detailed writeup, I think I understood it properly now!

        Crazy that you have to pay for PhotoPrism to have more users!

        Maybe they add these features you want to Immich? Given that it’s still in development.

      • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        How does it store images? Does it make one huge pile and sort it by metadata and external db magic?

        • Mora@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Pretty much however you want. You can let it import and sort by a folder logic of your design or can make it read an already existing library without immich modifying the structure.

          • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Thank you, will have to check the docs… I remeber someone told me it can’t import folder structure, but it’s been a while.

            • ahal@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              It definitely can, it’s called an “external library”. I just added my entire photo collection and use Immich as a frontend to view them all

              • skittlebrau@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Can you view an external library using your own folder structure and not in a timeline display? I was under the impression Immich can’t do that, at least not without manually creating them all as separate albums or by using a script.

                Eg.

                I have photos from the last 30 years stored in this type of folder structure:

                2002

                • 2002-06-23 Mum’s birthday party — 2002-06-23 Mum’s birthday party-0001.TIF

                I’m less interested in using it for photo backup since I’d prefer not to use an automated tool since I curate everything in my library so that it stays organised - I’m looking for something for viewing/displaying and sharing.

                • ahal@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Ah, yeah I guess you can’t browse your photos using a file system view. I just meant that it won’t automatically reorganize your pictures on the file system.

                  However you can create albums via an API call. You could probably write a script that adds each folder to an album or something.

        • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes. But it allows to define a custom storage layout based on user date time filename typ and album.

    • skittlebrau@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      One feature that I hope that Immich adopts is to allow for external libraries to be displayed in an existing folder structure. There’s no built-in way to do this and requires a script that uses albums as a workaround. A lot of photographers have organised folders by date/event that span years/decades, so it’s not practical to create these manually with albums.

      The closest I’ve found is a cron script which does album generation automatically, but it’s not a ‘future proof’ solution since it could stop working at any time.

      Memories (Nextcloud), Photoprism, and Photoview can do this.

  • Elkenders@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ooo similar image detection already implemented! Been wondering how I manage that!

  • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    So, do I need a GPU to use facial rec. with this?

    I have a NAS with a low powered CPU, but I don’t care if it takes weeks to analyse - we don’t take loads of photos.

    • megalodonosaurus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, I do all the facial stuff on my little n305. Depends on size of photos and how many. I have about 9k and it took a few hours to churn through.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      I passed my igpu through and honestly found almost no speed benefit after the initial import. So i removed it.

  • Harimau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah I am looking forward to the stable release.

    What happened to the old logo?

    Last time that I checked the Repo it was different.

  • Terrasque@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Better background backups

    Rework background backups to be more reliable

    Hilarious for a system which main point / feature is photo backup

    • d_k_bo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      Please read the warning at the top of their page:

      ⚠️ The project is under very active development. Expect bugs and changes. Do not use it as the only way to store your photos and videos!

      If you don’t like these breaking changes, this might not be the right software for you (for now).

      • baatliwala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        They should’ve stuck to v0.X versioning until it’s ready. Makes no sense to up to v1 if it’s still in alpha/beta

        • d_k_bo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t think they state anywhere that they adhere to semantic versioning.