like I lived through the brick to flip phone to smartphone era, but I can’t remember what features I was looking at on these flip phones when I was deciding which one to buy. do you guys remember?

  • Mountain_Mike_420@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 months ago

    I liked the ones that had fm receivers in them and if you plugged in a pair of headphones they would act as the antenna and you could listen to local Radio stations.

    • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I honestly miss that in modern handheld devices. A lot of radio stations aren’t even available as Internet radio, and if they are, there’s often no common search database (except iHeartRadio, except fuck iHeartRadio) so you have to manually input the stream URL, and a lot of them make it a pain in the ass to even find the stream URL on their site.

      In short: fuck Internet radio. FM’s where it’s at.

       


      Edit: Sorry, I should have specified: I’m in the US, specifically the Midwest.

  • NataliePortland@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m trying to remember. I think they had cameras. I know I had the Motorola Razr. Everyone had that phone. I think it had a camera and that was basically it. But everyone has that phone because it looked cool.

    • pelletbucket@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      for some reason my little brain decided that the razor was a girl’s phone and, being a teenager, that mattered.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    How big the front side screen was and if it was a colour display? Unless you liked the look of phone that only had LEDs showing the time on the front.

    What ringtones it had (remember this was the age of $1.99 ringtones).

    Speed/specs wasn’t too much of a factor as much as looks. As long as it made calls, did texts, play Snake and if you could afford cellular data then receive emails and do light websurfing then it was good enough.

    Oh, and in this age the smaller and more compact the phones were the better. Only with smartphones did the trend go into reverse.

  • tiramichu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Cared about:

    • Camera quality
    • Audio playback (Can it do MP3 ringtones?)
    • Looks and size (more important than anything else!)

    Didn’t care about:

    • Screen resolution
    • Processor specs
    • Onboard memory (because the assumption was all those photos and videos were going on an SD card)
    • pelletbucket@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      it’s funny that we cared about picture quality when we were viewing them on 240i screens

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Haha yeah.

        Honestly though, while I’d certainly look through my photos when I was bored on the train (having no Internet on phones then of course) that was never the intent of how I expected those photos to be viewed.

        I’d regularly transfer all the photos to my PC and that’s what I considered the “real” way to look at them, and email them from there to other people.

  • pelletbucket@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    okay, it’s starting to come back to me now. I remember the importance of caller ID on the outside of the phone. it was also really important to me that the phone continued working in speakerphone or with a headset after I closed it. I had one that no matter what settings you changed would not do it, closing it always hung up

  • Che Banana@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I looked for one that could fit in my front chest pocket and be indestructible when fallen out, and then kicked across the floor as I reach for it.

  • shastaxc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Tbh I always preferred the slide phones. But if you specifically want opinions on the flip phones…

    Needs to be able to open one handed with your thumb. Some models are too sleek with no ridge to pry up with your thumb.

    Needs to be durable. A lot of cheap flip phones start having screens and buttons coming off after a while because of slamming the phone shut all the time and being made of cheap parts.

    I preferred a phone with T9 texting, but maybe you can just download that these days.

    Vibration might be a factor for you. Some phones vibrate really loudly while others are more subtle. When I was in high school I wanted a vibration I could feel but not hear if it was in my pocket or my hand. Many modern smart phones have much more aggressive vibration than the old flip phones. Not a problem for me anymore now that I’m an adult.

  • starlord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    The weight of the flip does not cause the phone to jostle out of my grip but also fully opens it.

  • 10_0@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Never had a flipphone but I would imagine that features like: opening with one hand, FM radio, and a good microphone, and builtin games are a must. I’m gonna get a refurb (excellent condition from amazon) Samsung flip3 5g so I’m hoping that I can open it with one hand, and I’m a bit sad that’s there’s no FM radio on it. But a lot of comprises are made when buying former flagships. (No SD card slot, no FM radio, no headphone jack.)

    • Beeps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t remember phones ever having FM radio as a norm. Yoy could listen to stations that were playable online if you had data. But that was before streaming is what is now.

      • thepreciousboar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Very common before 2010. As far as I know the fm decoder was integrated in the SoC itself (at least it is so in modern SoCs), so it’s not even that demanding on the design. Probably not a requested feature, which is a bit sad

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I remember seeing a news broadcast about some tech expo where they showed being able to watch live television on your phone and they demonstrated it on a Motorola RAZR V3.

    7-year-old me instantly wanted one; plus the iTunes integration certain models of the RAZR had would’ve been pretty neat back then.

  • zout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    So first phone was an Ericson T10, this was basically the cheapest GSM in the late 90’s. After that I got a Nokia 3310 (flashed with 3315 firmware and with a Bacardi case) which had a bigger screen, so multiple lines of text on-screen. Also, you could send images over SMS and install custom midi ringtones. Next a Samsung X600 with a color screen and camera. After that a T-Mobile MDA vario (rebranded HTC Wizard 200) which was a less than great very bulky phone, but it had windows and a (stylus only) touch screen. I can’t really remember why I got it though. After that a Nokia N95, the last one before my first smart phone, which was a LG optimus 2X.