This has to be against some kind of law right?

    • Fijxu@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      I always do this when I can’t see a page. I also do it when they pop out a big box with text in the middle of the reading and if they also pop out a big box begging me to accept the cookies.

    • 1rre
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      The website doesn’t really care; they have hosting costs so if you’re not paying with money or by accepting ads then to them you’re worse than not visiting at all as you consume resources, so it’s good if you leave?

        • 1rre
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Sure, but people have memory and if you block people who aren’t even going to contribute to the running costs of the site via the channels they provide, never mind profit, then from the site owners perspective it’s pretty great if you recognise it as a site you don’t want to visit as you likely won’t come back

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      ublock origin has an annoyance list you have to manually enable, but it works wonders to get rid of those.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 days ago

    Don’t worry, once they have your credit card number they’ll track you even more. At best you’ll get a £‎2.35 cheque from a class action lawsuit in seven years, assuming they ever even get caught.

  • skillissuer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    thank brexiters for that, it’s illegal in eu

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah, they’ll still collect your data and happily sell it as soon as your subscription ends. Also, this subscription would likely only cover first-party tracking. It wouldn’t cover things like a Facebook Like button being embedded in the site, which allows Facebook to track you.

  • Hellfire103@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 days ago

    Moral of the story? Don’t read the Express. To quote Dave Gorman, it’s a crock of shit.

  • Dave.@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Not really, it’s just phrased differently to the usual signup pitch, they’re putting in a middle ground between full “premium” subscribers (whatever that is) and public access with tracking and ad metrics.

    Companies need revenue to operate. They get that revenue from advertising data and selling ad slots, or subscriptions. Whether they actually cease all tracking and ad metrics when you subscribe is something I’d doubt though, and that could be a case for the legal system if they didn’t do what they claim.

    Personally, this behaviour is the point where I would not consider the site to be valuable enough to bother with.

  • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    This has to be against some kind of law right?

    Only in the EU.

    Anyways I think that “pay or consent” model isn’t that bad. You either pay with your data or your money. Seems fine to me though pay only would be better. Everyone is used to getting everything online for free. It has to change now imo. The internet isn’t a bunch of hobby forum projects anymore. The price of running a popular website is big and idk if privacy-respecting ads can give enough profit at this point.

  • zerozaku@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    Hey that’s a lot better than companies who asks you to pay and still share your data for profits