• Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      To clarify, what you’re doing is “what-aboutism”. Asking China to be more humane is not a comment on anything but China being more humane.

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They weren’t just asking China to be more humane, though. They were suggesting that China doesn’t deserve our cooperation because they are inhumane, which implies we have the moral high ground and is explicitly hypocritical. It isn’t whataboutism to point out hypocrisy.

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          There’s a lot of assuming, implying, and suggesting in that take. The original just said if they were more humane we would work with them.

          • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You don’t at all see how that implies moral superiority? Or are you just giving them the benefit of the doubt?

            The problem is holding China to a higher standard than we hold ourselves to.

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You brought up other societies as compared them to us. It’s the definition of what-aboutism, just read up on it again to make sure.