• M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oh nice, so people are spending $30,000 min on any new car AND it will record and pass on everything you do in it? Oh and depending on the car manufacturer you may have to pay a subscription for remote entry and heated seats. Its almost as if you are paying for something that you don’t control, don’t own and now works directly to steal information from you. Cool. Cool.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        What they really clicked is “this is bullshit and I don’t have time to read all of this, just to use something I paid for”. If companies were required by law to distill their policies into plain English and short summaries then a lot fewer people would have clicked accept. But those ToS started out as nothing more than overly long liability waivers, and over the years the corporations started sneaking more and more exploitative language into them.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 months ago

    I guess someone should’ve presented the following situations to the court: some CEO of a small-medium company driving his Toyota sends a very important message regarding work. Toyota also gets to read it and is immediately aware of how that’ll affect stock price. Time to gamble on the market, baby!

    Situation 2: some researcher driving his Honda sends several files regarding a secret new product to his boss. Honda also gets to access the files and the content of the message. “Oh look, Honda released my product before me!”

    Situation 3: After using the snooped information for self profit, the automaker sells it to 3rd parties for further profit.

  • bestusername@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    Probably a stupid question…

    What about CarPlay and Android Apps? Is that being intercepted by the car manufacturer?

    My basic understanding is Android Auto is pretty much an external monitor for your phone.

    • AttackPanda@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You got me curious as well so I googled it and it looks like CarPlay just uses the screen as a monitor with no messages or anything downloaded:

      https://discussions.apple.com/thread/252600482

      Now I wonder what kind of system these vehicles have that downloads text messages. Is that a function of the Bluetooth connectivity or is it a vendor application?

      • FarFarAway@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I connected Bluetooth to my car, and first thing it asked was if I wanted to allow access to my texts, call logs, and contacts.

        I admit, i think I did it once. It acted like it didn’t work. Idk. It periodically still asks though. It doesn’t do this if I connect my phone to the car through Andriod Auto.

    • oranwolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m curious about this as well. I know my car can access phone records and contacts for Bluetooth calling outside of AA, but what about everything else? I also thought it was just an external monitor for all of my other apps.

        • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Bingo, they want to hoover up all that data. Between subscriptions for hardware functionality and data mining, they want to turn cars into recurring revenue streams.

          • averagedrunk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            My guess is that some non-insignificant (though certainly not large) new portion of buyers will replace their head units, assuming they keep the double DIN standard. It’s trivial to change out currently.

            Of course if too many people do it they’ll change the slot and make the wiring harness an incomprehensible mess. One wire now controls your left rear audio channel, rolls down all your windows, and deploys caltrops if the police are behind you. If you wire things incorrectly it locks you in and sets the car on fire.

      • bestusername@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Definitely, forgot about that, calls do seem to go via the cars factory Bluetooth system. I can unplug my phone mid call and it jumps to the cars own call screen.

        So phone number, duration and possibly caller/contact name would be known by the factory headunit and any other information Bluetooth shares with the connect device.

  • imgprojts@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    I got my ballot this Monday and half of the spots to be voted on had only one candidate… maybe remove that shit from the ballot and add things like…“would you like Toyota to know where you are when you send emails about your period?” That would be useful.

  • imgprojts@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Double you fucking tee eff? Holybonkerslaw Batman! Now what? Can Motorola take pictures of me while I take a shower watching porn?..err, sending emails?

  • CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t want to sound like a corporate shill, but this sounds necessary for handsfree functions. To read an incoming text read aloud, there would have to be a copy stored. If one was paranoid, they could just avoid pairing their phone.

    • Kindness@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Washington Privacy Act (WPA).

      Plaintiffs’ operative complaint alleged that their vehicles’ infotainment systems download and permanently store all text messages and call logs from Plaintiffs’ cellphones without their consent.

      […]

      The district court properly dismissed Plaintiffs’ claim for failure to satisfy the WPA’s statutory injury requirement. See WASH. REV. CODE § 9.73.060. To succeed at the pleading stage of a WPA claim, a plaintiff must allege an injury to “his or her business, his or her person, or his or her reputation.” Id. Contrary to Plaintiffs’ argument, a bare violation of the WPA is insufficient to satisfy the statutory injury requirement.

      • TauZero@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Brb, gonna wiretap the judge’s house. It’s not a crime as long as I don’t act on the information I hear so there is no injury.