Listen, this user is a terminally online anarchist who complains about tankies and calls Stalin genocidal. But shes correct about this one. Mostly. I mean using the term “bedtime abolition” sounds dumb but Im pretty sure she only did that because its a common joke about anarchists. The core point is about how 9-5 work schedules dont work for everyone. As an ND person who struggles with culturally normal sleep schedules, I absolutely agree that society needs to accomodate these things. I absolutely agree that its literally normal talk everyone says that work schedules suck.

People saying “just go to bed on time” or “just pop a melatonin” have never been in the position of trying to do that and failing, just laying awake for hours until you finally fall asleep two hours before you need to be up.

https://nitter.net/moonlit_misfit/status/1743350718944121067

    • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m trying to interpret the point of the order of the flags. I think it’s kind of looped, so US/China are next to each other here, which leaves most of the rest as natural pairs. Israel/Palestine, Ukraine/Russia. But do Greece and Turkey have some beef I’m not familiar with? Because that one still confuses me.

      • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, I think they have a bit of the “two cultures with a lot of intermingling who both claim they invented XYZ and used to fight about borders” thing going on.

        They both claim sovereignty over the whole of Cyprus and both control a portion of it, IIRC.

      • AlpineSteakHouse [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        But do Greece and Turkey have some beef I’m not familiar with?

        Of course the Greeks and Turks hate each other. Some Greeks are still salty over the Ottoman Empire. You can tell this poster never listened to the soothing rants of Stavros “The Mind” Halkias.

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    11 months ago

    Bedtime discourse is a waste of energy and bandwidth when 4 day work week is an actually viable improvement that could happen in our lifetimes. Dividing our attention between different time-based issues is a surefire way to reduce effectiveness at getting either of them achieved.

    Anyway Flexi-Time is already a standard thing used by huge quantities of businesses, it’s widely adopted in the UK even by government. It literally eliminates this issue.

    Stop talking about bedtimes and start organising to drag your company into giving Flexitime as a concession to workers.

    • quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      11 months ago

      100-com

      This kind of specific labor issue is best fought consciously through working class solidarity, such as labor unions or larger political movements. But the emphasis and perspective should always be on labor as a class, not on particular issues that are only a consequence of the capital-labor contradiction.

      • CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well yes that’s the solution, and I’m sure she’d agree. Highlighting particular ways in which capitalism crushes people’s souls is a part of the discourse, going back to Marx and even further.

        It really feels like everyone in this thread is reacting to the political aesthetic of this person and then putting in extra effort to find some sort of dunk on her.

        • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          11 months ago

          It really feels like everyone in this thread is reacting to the political aesthetic of this person and then putting in extra effort to find some sort of dunk on her.

          Seriously. We should be above twitter style dunk thirst here. We arent quote tweeting her with a charachter limited dunk for engagement farming lol

        • quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The problem is that they bring up a real issue in a dumb way, and in so doing, actually harm the cause instead of helping it. Having a bedtime is not the root of people’s problems so I personally find it valid to criticize their self-righteousness, because people tune out when online leftists complain that their brilliance is unrecognized.

          To say nothing because the general vibe of their tweet is good is the sixth type of liberalism. Though, criticizing behind their back over here on Hexbear is the second type, so I guess I’m a lib too.

          That said I basically agree with you about the importance of highlighting the particular flaws of capitalism in order to increase consciousness, and also that we shouldn’t be hung up on aesthetic.

          • CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            The problem is that they bring up a real issue in a dumb way, and in so doing, actually harm the cause instead of helping it.

            I don’t know that these tweets matter that much.

            The internet is such a shitty place to organize because it draws people into these obtuse theoretical nitpickings. It all feels so bad faith. In person it’s always much easier to forgive someone’s botched phrasing when you know their heart and head are in the right place. /minirant

            • NewAcctWhoDis [any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Then why are we talking about it all though? OP made it clear this is someone who generally makes bad points, and they did a bad job making this (potentially good) point. So what’s the point of using them or their tweets to start this discussion?

  • asg101 [none/use name, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    11 months ago

    The capitalist/industrialized sleep schedule is not natural. Humans evolved to sleep at different times to provide security to the community. Some rise early, some sleep late, some sleep in “shifts”.

    Your body will tell you when and how long to sleep, Fuck the bosses’ schedules.

  • CrushKillDestroySwag@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    11 months ago

    Flexible schedules should be considered a worker’s right. Obviously the degree to which your schedule can be flexible depends heavily on what you do but I think there are more jobs than people think where you could make the schedule “show up any time, as long as the work gets done some time today” and it would work fine.

  • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 months ago

    The problem is not just the 9-5 society (or more like 7-3 if you’re working in construction or similar). These received schedules doesn’t work for everyone and that is a problem. But the problem is also that there is simply not enough time for sleep in most people’s daily schedules, no matter at what time of the day you put it.

    If you have a full time job and a commute and you have housework and other chores that needs to be done for things to function and you also want to have the luxury of feeling like a person with some kind of agency to decide what you want to use your time on, even if it is just for a little while, then you rarely have the time to also get eight hours of uninterrupted sleep. This gets even worse if you have children.

    The only way the ruling liberal-conservative ideology can engage with the problem is to turn it into a question of individual moral shortcomings and shame people for taking a little leisure time for themselves at the end of the day. “Why are you complaining about being sleep deprived, you ungrateful peasant? Just do nothing but work and sleep.”

    • CarbonScored [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 months ago

      Much agreed. Though I’m sure timing of sleep matters to some, for me the reality is that I feel tired no matter when I go to bed, because most days I don’t feel capable of sparing the 8 hours of sleep I need. It takes me a long time to chill out from the anxiety that work and financial chores stir up in me so I rarely really reach the point of genuinely ‘relaxing’ after work.

      Revenge bedtime procrastination is also a big part. I deserve to enjoy some of my life dangit >:(

  • showmustgo [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 months ago

    a 9-5 schedule drains my energy

    No shit, that’s half the point. All you should have energy left for in the evening is to consume a bit of distilled pop culture and some of your vice of choice

    • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      I wish I had a 28 hour day but somehow it was secret to the rest of society so they couldn’t invent more bullshit to put in there for me to have to do.

    • TraumaDumpling@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      just stay inside all day with blackout curtains, no one can tell you the 28-hour-day is wrong lol

      molemen stay winning with the subterranean 28-hour day

  • quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    To me it seems that standardized business hours arise from cooperation in the work place, which increased exponentially with the industrial revolution. Capitalist, socialist, whatever, if you have people cooperating in factories (e.g.) then they have to be there at the same time. So “bedtime abolition” seems utopian because it is the practical consequence of a cooperative productive process, and it can’t be abolished without abolishing the actual basis, cooperative labor, or more specifically the necessity of simultaneous work. Our production would have to change such that work is parceled out in time-independent units, which is possible for a lot of industries, but by a structural change and not by decree. Software development is cooperative but does not typically require that developers cooperate in real time, for example.

    And of course, the above is made all the more severe by the actual duration of the working day. If people only had to work 4 hours per day, then it would be far easier to handle standard business hours of 10a-2p for example, even if they technically are not flexible hours.

  • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    She’s right about what she’s saying but I don’t really see how it relates to “bedtime abolition.” Like I feel completely the same about sleep schedules. I dropped out of high school primarily because I could not fucking handle being on a consistent daytime schedule every day, week after week. I got third shift / overnight jobs and I’m much, much healthier now. I get actual sleep now. Some people just aren’t built for the 9-5.

    But what the fuck does that have to do with parents making their kids get to sleep at a reasonable time relative to their responsibilities lol

    • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think she uses the term “bedtime abolition” because its a joke used at anarchist expense. Like ive actually seen the post this was triggered by which would probably have been helpful context.

  • Llituro [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 months ago

    it’s not a bad take, but getting there via being reactively pissed about people poking fun at “bedtime abolition” isn’t doing much for the case that anarchists are serious. which obviously many anarchists are, but being overly serious about the bedtime abolition bit isn’t doing any favors for anarchism.

  • Sphere [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 months ago

    The primary thing that annoys me about this person’s point is the term “bedtime abolition.” She doesn’t want bedtime abolition at all; no one does (everyone wants to go to bed at some point, after all). What she wants is wakeup-time abolition. And I agree with that. Calling it bedtime abolition has the dual effect of incorrectly expressing the issue, and making the person saying it sound like a whiny child.

  • regul [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    Monkey’s paw curls and the next capitalist frontier is the hours between 5PM and 9AM, for all businesses. You can exploit three times as many people!

    Why shouldn’t third shift be for offices, too!?