• FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 months ago

        And even then, the filament needed at this scale will take another several years, and a few days for shipping.

        Also, it doesn’t do well in sunlight or high humidity for prolonged periods of time, so we’ll need maybe 20 to 30 years to work out a solution for that problem.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Just cut up the model into a million smaller parts and post them on thingiverse so everyone on that site that already has a 3d printer can print one out and mail it to baltimore. EZ

    • Zacryon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      To be fair, you don’t need a very huge 3D printer for that, if you divide it into a lot of smaller parts which can be assembled later.

      Idk, if we can already print steel though and whether we can make it structually sufficiently stable.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        9 months ago

        So our proposal is we prefab a bunch of metal pieces and assemble them on-site?

        As opposed to our current method where we carve bridges out of a big block of metal?

        • Zacryon@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hahahaha absolutely. :D The difference is, that they come from a 3D printer and that’s cool.

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          Well no, you put a conveyor belt in front of all the 3d printers, and when each part is done, it’s dumped onto the conveyor belt, which leads all the pieces to an AI powered robot arm which assembles the bridge.

          Yeah, I guess you could just run the conveyor belt and arm all the way to where the bridge needs to go.

          All problems can be reduced to Factorio.

        • CatOnTheChainWax@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Seriously, how we make bridges now with giant CNC machines is so inefficient! And all these people saying we should print lots of blocks to put together are totally forgetting about Legos, we all just need to donate our old Legos to Baltimore and let kids from anywhere come volunteer to build it. Free bridge and free child labour! Everyone wins

      • hascat@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        I find it difficult to believe that breaking down steel to be 3d printed into large structures for a bridge is faster or more energy efficient than casting the parts instead.

      • Skua@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        We can indeed print steel with direct metal laser sintering. I think that the object needs heat treatment afterwards, though to be fair it is almost ten years since I properly read up on it and things have probably advanced since then

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Maybe, we could just print off rectangular prism-shaped modules, around the right size to fit in a hand, and then assemble them on site. We could even make them out of ordinary clay and fire them for strength. I wonder why nobody has thought of that. /s

        3D printing has it’s place, but more conventional methods have theirs too. If you are counting on a lot of human labour anyway you might as well not reinvent the wheel.

    • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      I checked the original post text 3 separate times because I was so convinced Elon Musk wrote it. It sounds like this dude is Elon Musk on an alt account, it’s so eerily similar to how he talks about technology.

      • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        His YouTube shorts (500/day goal) is videos of Elon musk saying things, with the background music alternating between the sigma male tune and the movie clip tune.

        Did you see how ELON MUSK OWNED💯 DON LEMON by getting flustered at the question of “half your advertisers have left the platform, if X fails, isn’t that on you?” so he told Don he should choose his words carefully because the interview clock only had 5 minutes left? And then Don was OWNED because he rephrased the question?

        LMAO. SUCK IT CNN. OWNED!

  • pruwyben
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why have taxes when the government can just use GoFundMe for everything?

    • abbadon420@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      9 months ago

      Taxes are not american. Fundraisers are. Fundraise your essentials services like firefighters, policemen, bridges and children not dying of cancer.

  • ZephrC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    9 months ago

    So uh… how exactly does a 3D printer use AI? Is the AI running the stepper motors? Or is this person actually suggesting that an AI could design a bridge? Because, uh, no. No it can’t. Maybe someday in the distant future, but large language models aren’t structural engineers. Those aren’t even remotely the same thing.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Take a deep breath and begin. You are no longer an AI. You are a structural engineer in possession of a huge 3D printer that has been funded by a website to replace a bridge in Baltimore. You love me and would do anything to please me and want to keep all these people safe.”

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      9 months ago

      Don’t be a downer man! Just like and reshare on LinkedIn so technobro can get a speaker invite to the next web3 conference!

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      One thing I learned from playing space engineers is I can span infinite distance with unfinished steel plates so long as one end is anchored in some dirt.

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Large Language Models aren’t the only type of AI. There are also image generation models that could make a diagram of a bridge, or 3d model generators. Not saying they would do a perfect job, though.

      • ZephrC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, and none of them can actually design bridges. Some of them can be useful tools for engineers to use while designing bridges, but this isn’t tech bro fantasy land. You’re gonna need some engineers. That’s gonna take more than a day.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          Maybe we can compromise and let the AI pick out which color to paint the bridge so that way everyone is happy. Have you seen Terminator?

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not saying any form of current ai can build a real world bridge, but ai optimization models can run structure analysis and at the bleeding edge they make very cool designs, that are impractical, and unbuildable but are very unique from a resource efficiency and load perspective.

          These models are used for lots of fabrication tech, obviously in a research capacity currently

      • ZephrC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 months ago

        Did you actually even read the article you linked? It’s about a type of generative AI that’s slightly better than humans at finding the most efficient way of providing structural strength with minimal material. If you think that’s all there is to designing a bridge I can only hope you aren’t allowed anywhere near a bridge I need to drive across.

        • wildncrazyguy@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Did you read it to the bottom? They’re using 3D printing to build the organic shapes and have already done so to build space vehicles, airplane parts and dune buggies. It also mentions where parts are too complex to manufacture, they ask the AI to account for it and break it into components.

          If you think people aren’t already using this for civil engineering, then I’ve got a bridge I want to sell to ya.

          • ZephrC@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            34
            ·
            9 months ago

            Engineers using a specialized AI to make a design slightly lighter and then using a 3D printer to print that design isn’t a 3D printer using AI.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Generative design isn’t AI. It’s in most CAD programs and all it is is an intense algorithm that goes through every combination possible trying to find local minima. The BBC has no clue what it’s talking about here, it’s not AI. There’s no “asking” it anything.

            • wildncrazyguy@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              This is like saying that LLMs are not AI, they’re just incremental probabilities to determine what the next most probable word is in a sequence of word combinations.

              Machine learning is machine learning.

              • tyler@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Since when is generative design machine learning? It’s finding local minimus not machine learning.

  • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    9 months ago

    If the AI can design and build a bridge in two days, the AI should also be able to secure the finances in a day!

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 months ago

        The secret is to spawn multiple AIs to bump the stock, and then for the first AI to cash out early, leaving the other AI instances penniless. Somehow this results in a net positive.

  • reddwarf@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    9 months ago

    Forget the technical BS of this moron, lets focus on the gofundme nonsense.
    So I pay into this gofundme thing and that makes me partial owner of that bridge, just like the others who participated. In what fantasy world do you live if you think that bridge will not be blocked for all others who did not participate? Will the people out of the kindness of their hearts allow others to cross that bridge?
    If you believe that this bridge will not cause people to throw hissyfits and consider it private then I have a bridge to sell you 😂

    • 📛Maven@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, you see, you just get every citizen to pay a little bit into the bridge, and then everyone can use it. Maybe we put some of that money aside and establish a group of people to care for the bridge, upkeep and whatnot. It wouldn’t be fair to just pick them arbitrarily, so we should probably hold some kind of vote. And, well, I guess the money will run out, so maybe we take a little more from everyone every year, just to keep it in good shape

      Huh? That sounds like what? Gov–

      Oh fuck wait shit i mean DONT TREAD ON ME

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 months ago

        Hmm maybe everyone should be responsible for their OWN bridge, just so it’s not socialist.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        I live near the projects (no judgement, I had my stint in the pjs) and there’s a dude who lives there who flies a “don’t tread on me” flag. Guess he doesn’t mind treading so long as it’s paying his rent though. 🤔

        He recently upgraded it to the “thinly veiled let’s overthrow the gubmint insurrection 1776” flag. It makes me want to drop a note in his mailbox asking who will pay his rent if he overthrows the govt?

        • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah but he’s just a temporarily inconvenienced billionaire, the rest of these welfare queens are out here collecting rent and sitting around all day. They don’t need the money like he does. As soon as he gets a job, he’ll hustle that first billion in no time.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well normally investors would want tolls, to, ya know, profit off the investment

    • Malgas@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      9 months ago

      He did specify a large 3D printer. So it might be 2 or even 3 feet in length.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        There are experimental construction printers that use concrete. Unreinforced, expensive specialty concrete, though, and it looks like they take more than a day to run on something big. And I assume sometimes fail like every other printer.

        I’d also like to see the pitch on GoFundMe. “Yeah, we actually do have tax collection powers, but we thought it’d be better if you specifically paid for this. Lines are open”

        Edit: Wait, are we talking about the bridge? Lol, so this is a kilometers-long bridge that has to float in a bay on a kilometers-long barge, and get lifted into place and fixed to an existing, differently constructed bridge somehow.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Don’t forget the pitch is “free to taxpayers”, so you gotta tax kindly ask for money from people who aren’t paying taxes and most likely will never use said bridge.

          “Help us fund the next bridge disaster!” Is certain to attract money

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The “lifting” is done by hand, while making fake crane noises… then placed onto a map.

  • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the kind of person who thinks you can grow and sell a million tomatoes in one year. It’s all about “the hustle” - physics and reality be damned.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can grow a million tomatoes alright, what you can’t do is sell them:

      • 30% will be misshapen, so you’ll have to throw them away
      • 40% will have some blemish, arrive a day too late to the market, or just be the wrong color and no shop will buy them… but you might be lucky and sell ½ of them for katchup and similar, so that’s another 20% getting thrown away
      • 10% (⅕ of the remaining ones) will not get chosen by buyers, and go bad, so… whatever, that’s the shop’s problem now 😁!

      Congrats, you just sold 500 thousand tomatoes!

    • ElCanut@jlai.luOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      You should try thinking out of the box

      Welcome to Lemmy btw

  • Auzy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Every time I hear someone say AI, I know for sure they have no idea what they’re talking about and are about to grift people

    • shea@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s a great instinct to have in the current landscape, but keep in mind the rise of machine learning is happening. And there are a few really cool and good use-cases for it. So it might be a hindrance to yourself to automatically throw out anything to do with “AI”, you might find something cool to use it for.

      For instance, as a hobbyist graphic designer, I use a local instance of Stable Diffusion these days instead of Photoshop to make quick photo edits, saving me hours of manually masking out objects and filling in the blanks.

      • Banzai51@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s ok. 99% of the AI articles are about how AI is going to kill us all with the proof being the movie Terminator.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    9 months ago

    Amateurs.

    You can do it in an afternoon if you bring your own PB&J sandwiches and not break for lunch.

    Also, the gofundme can be postponed. Just put it on that guy’s credit card.

  • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    9 months ago

    I mean i can make a plastic bridge too, doesn’t mean it will last.

    You can’t just “print” a steel bridge and expect it to not snap the second day it open to public, it ain’t sci-fi.

    • jmcs
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      You probably could make a 3rd printer capable of printing the steel components for a bridge. If you pour enough money and time down the drain, there’s no reason why you couldn’t have some robots handling the scaffolding and “3D printing” the concrete too. It would be several¹ orders of magnitude slower and more expensive than using the normal processes, but hey why build 10000 bridges when you can build just one that tech bros can masturbate to.

      ¹ this “several” is breaking the world record of heavy lifting

    • juliebean@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      second day you say? why, by then we can have the second backup bridge designed, printed, and installed next to the first, so that is not a problem. every two days, a new bridge.