Apple, Microsoft, Sony…it’s cool to hate them but can we please direct some fucking ire to this absolute pinnacle of piece of shittery that’s always on the frontier of the shittiest business practices in all things IT?

How has this compamy escaped a class action lawsuit by the entire population of the world?

  • tamagotchicowboy [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    When I was in college and we got student license edition I always preferred to use pirate-jammin on principal alone…and it somehow performed better than the licensed edition.

  • NewDark [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think it’s because they aren’t quite as ubiquitous. Most the people heavily involved with Adobe products do so for creative work, and that’s a relatively small niche comparatively.

      • NewDark [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sure, that’s about the extent of the everyday use case, a shitty file format. Im not talking about search, email, calendar, operating systems, and all kinds of other things you will regularly touch on the internet.

        In not saying Adobe isn’t prominent, just comparatively a lot smaller.

  • LGOrcStreetSamurai [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’s crazy to me that Adobe has managed to to make any money. Their software products at their core are pretty solid, however all of their products are covered in barbed wire and throned vines. The idea that basic features require a subscription is beyond bonkers to me. I don’t know how they managed to survive the 90s at all.

    I hate Adobe, all my homies hate Adobe, and it’s deeply frustrating there has not been a meaningful alterative yet.

    • pemptago@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      They survived the 90’s because they weren’t subscription-based back then. They could charge a lot more, but they had to actually invest in development so that clients would be willing to pay for an upgrade. Once development started stagnating, and they had an enormous market share, they could switch over to the subscription model and start charging people to access the software (and their files) in perpetuity.

      • LGOrcStreetSamurai [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        They could charge a lot more, but they had to actually invest in development so that clients would be willing to pay for an upgrade.

        That one thing I hate about technology as it is. It’s not modern tech is inherently bad, it’s that technology is engineered around becoming more profitable rather than better. They aren’t making better products anymore, they just finding new ways to charge you for them. UGH.

    • pemptago@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      the affinity suite is a good alternative if you’re not on linux, not that adobe supports linux last i checked. There’s also https://www.photopea.com/ Really depends on the use case, plenty of better painting options out there now. For photo editing, a dedicated raw editor can cover a lot of territory. For compositing heavy stuff, I use gimp or even blender. inkscape is awesome for vector work.

      i could go on. i think a lot of people forget how difficult it was to learn adobe software when they started, and it’s tough to switch and lose that muscle memory, but even if the alternatives aren’t as good, most have been improving over the years and adobe has just gotten worse and worse. Redirecting money from adobe to alternatives will accelerate that.

      It’s also much easier to write scripts for adobe alternatives, so it’s possible to get productivity boosts in that domain, depending on how you work.

  • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    Adobe managed to suppress the entire field of creative software by buying out every potential future competitor and killing off their product, for decades, until everybody forgot that’s a kind of software you can make.

  • bumpusoot [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’ve been hating Adobe since I was a child, before it was cool.

    …Nah, who am I kidding, Adobe has pretty much always been hateworthy. They really pioneered some of the most awful modern day payment and DRM models.

  • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    I would probably buy PS, but I will not subscribe to it. Gimp does what I need on the rare occasions I need to do something.

    Acrobat is just dumb. I don’t see any benefit to it over free/cheaper alternatives.

  • erik [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    Say what you will about Apple, I gave them a couple hundred bucks almost fourteen years ago and I can just use their video editing suite as much as I want and they give me every updates on the reg.

  • DragonBallZinn [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    As someone trying to become more creative. By God do I hate Adobe. They’re greedy pigs and proud of it.

    I also hate it for what it represents, they’re industry standard so if you want to follow your dreams and become a creative. Guess what? You have one of many paywalls in your way to stop you. There is nothing porky wants more than for all arts to be luxury hobbies for only the rich.

    • bumpusoot [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Firefox has honestly been a better PDF reader than the inventors of the PDF for about a decade now.

      Adobe PDF reader is the peak of bloatware and really shouldn’t be installed anywhere anymore. Last I saw, it was like 400MB of software to read-only open a file type? Could be gigs if they have AI shit in it now too.

  • Smeagolicious [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Despite the huge market share PS is so much worse & less convenient than my usual digital art program, Clip Studio. What do you mean you can’t non-destructively mirror a canvas in PS?!?