The TLDR of the video is that the Russian invasion of Ukraine was bad, and that Western and Ukrainian aggression didn’t poke the tiger. He doesn’t mention that the West could end the war tomorrow.

To be fair, I’m not pro Putin. I know Russians in Russia who are risking their safety to be peace activists, which is the correct and noble position to have in Russia. An Australian guy taking the position that Putin bad just seems easy and is doing the work of the State department.

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    Agree that this is a very bad take. There are Cable leaks from US diplomat going back DECADES that confirm just how serious the notion of Ukraine joining nato was to Russia and that it would likely mean a war if it ever came to fruition.

    This is 2008 so it’s pre 2014 coup

    I think the other side of this that’s rarely talked about are the families with members that were on the ukrainian side and the russian side. For Russia a huge issue with Ukraine joining nato is the quantity of families with individuals who then become nato and will be turned into natoites. The effect that these family members will have on their family across the border is of major concern. They don’t want a base being created for colour revolution, or worse.

    • mbt2402 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      america has a long and storied history of ignoring the advice of their ambassadors. Not that the stupidity is a defence, but it is believable to me that natos were surprised.

  • ManFreakBeast [he/him]@hexbear.netBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    and that Western and Ukrainian aggression didn’t poke the tiger.

    I think his argument is more that they did poke it but that doesn’t justify a full scale land invasion.

    I don’t agree with him, but honestly his take here seems way more consistent and rational than Libs on the topic. He’s still wrong, but I was honestly expecting it to be worse given his history.

    • Nama [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      If this was the entire argument, his position would be kind of valid. Nato poking the bear is an explanation, but not an excuse for Russia.

      But then he later states that the forced conscription in Ukraine is just what any nation would do. Which, sure, but that’s not a fucking excuse either then.

      • ManFreakBeast [he/him]@hexbear.netBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        No I agree.

        He made points here I respect tho and think it’s good for Libs to hear.

        Comparing this to Gaza is ridiculous, Ukraine has a government and a military, more specifically a military with the backing of the most powerful governments on earth.

        There’s no evidence of genocide, Russia’s goal is clearly to take territory not to wipe out a group of people, most of the casualties are combatants not civilians.

        I strongly disagree with his downplaying of how entrenched neo-Nazis clearly are in the Ukrainian military though, and suggesting there 0 genuine, non-astroturfed Russian separatist sentiment in eastern Ukraine.

        • Nama [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          His sentiment is overall much better still than most liberals, of course. It’s just his dismissal of very valid leftist positions that irks me. This is a fight between two capitalist nations and the principled take would be no war but the class war. To that end, the forced conscription of both sides should be highlighted as the barbaric thing it is, where the state forces unwilling men to die for the profits of oligarchs. BadEmpanada rightfully points out that this whole war is a pointless meat grinder that doesn’t serve either people.

          Russia doesn’t care about the fascists, but they are still there, and fucking Bandera is now widely celebrated. Ukraine is not a nation worth the blood shed over it. Defending Ukraine serves no purpose for the cause of any denomination of socialism. It is also not our responsibility as westerners to deal with the Russian imperialism either, we got our own house to clean. This shit is what broke the second international, we should know this by now. Working against the war effort of “our” side is the fucking point, because they are not our side, and we are responsible for it. So what, if Russia “wins” or there is a peace treaty? It puts an end to the dying and there are still capitalists in control. Boo hoo. But there is no need to put it this way.

          This isn’t a fight where leftists should pick a side to “support”, it’s a pointless war we should oppose. The senselessness and cruelty of it all, of either side, should not be excused, but highlighted. This is what capitalism fucking does. Don’t say Ukraine or the West is right, don’t say Russia is right, say this war is shit. It was preventable, neither leadership cares about its people, and it should end. If you wanna go for the “good guy” appearance, say you support UN monitored referendums in the contested areas after a peace treaty, or something like that. Put the people first. They live on the land, they get to decide. That’s democracy.

          Sorry for the rant.

      • glimmer_twin [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        For me the subtext of the video came across as “this is horrific for the working class of both countries and should stop”, which is literally the correct take.

        • WideningGyro [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          “war is bad and should stop”, when removed from context and analysis is not a take, it’s a platitude.

          The fact that he whitewashes the West’s role in the war, pretends Ukraine is not a country with a significant Russian-friendly minority, and puts the blame for the war’s consequences and continuation on Russia means that his “war is bad and should stop” ends up being an endorsement of NATO’s position - that only Russia can and should take measures to stop the war, and that any escalation from the West is justified.

  • Lussy [he/him, des/pair]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would I spend my free time consuming neither educational material nor actual entertainment and escapism? And this dude is a lot more ‘political commentary’ than he is ‘entertainment’ so I’m fucking out

  • catonkatonk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kind of a sidebar here but he says that Russia is a dictatorship and that people should gtfo about the “elections”.

    Now, I don’t really know much about Russia at all, but polling shows that Putin is immensely popular, right? So what’s the point in rigging elections that you’re going to win anyway? I don’t think he was trying to make a broader point either, I think he was saying the elections themselves are shams? So… Are they?

    • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      The elections aren’t shams. The fact various powers in Russia will kill any threat and get away with it is the main drawback. With that said it’s not like the US doesn’t have a history of assassinations of political figures, carried out both by the state and by non-state actors.

  • DivineChaos100 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s an admittedly half-assed video which probably was made only because he never made a proper one when the war started it’s to be taken as seriously as his live stream slop content. It’s good to piss off both Z-leninist/banderites and harvest that good good engagement nectar.

    My general rule is that i dont watch videos of his that doesnt have at least 20 citations in the description.

  • Tabitha ☢️[she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    it’s all a facade, he’s probably intentionally taking the L here to make his video about debunking the Holodomir conspiracy theory have more credibility among the libs, a strong long-term move if you ask me.

  • Thallo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cold take: Putin is, in fact, bad.

    The war is also bad insofar as victory on either side will not serve the working class. As usual, they are being thrown into the meat grinder so that whoever wins can exploit them better. I won’t call it an inter-imperialist conflict, but there’s certainly not a socialist element to it.

    The only benefit is a slightly weakened empire (US) which will have less regional power. A worthwhile goal, but to be honest, it seems like the price has been really high.

  • glimmer_twin [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Feels like a number of people in this thread are a couple of weeks away from genuinely thinking “Putin is based secret communist trying to re-establish the USSR” lol.

  • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s a good point made here that “if Russia gained influence in Mexico, that wouldn’t justify the US invading it”.

    But we know that the US would absolutely do that, if it came to it. We know from the Cuban Missile Crisis, we know from the unmatched number of foreign interventions/coups the US has done, we know from the contingency plans that the DoD has had for a long time for invading Mexico and toppling the government, and we know from Trump’s threats over the cartels that he’d do it for a lot less than a great power rivalry.

    There is a gap between what many countries ethically ought to do, and what they practically can be expected to do. We should be able to tell these apart.

  • coolusername@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Misses on smo and Uyghur genocide means high possibly of being a fed. That shit isn’t hard to figure out.