I’d like to see just how horrible someone can make a site. Facebook is a good contender.

  • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 minutes ago

    DHL.

    Website designed by hateful people who seem to make it as hard as possible to pay duty fees on parcels.

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I think the time I was like 7 and was looking at hamster photos on Google to print and cut out. Scrolling along I couldn’t find any that looked exactly like my hamster named Cinnamon after a black streak along his back.
    Getting to the 3rd or 4th “load more” buttons on Google and it started showing me stuff that wasn’t hamsters I got desperate. I saw there were a few images that had text along the top and bottom, “for more cute hamster photos go to xhamster.com”.

    So naturally, I went there.

    Turns out xhamster.com was not a site where hamsters share selfies and is, instead, pornography.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    22 hours ago

    fcc.gov. Those goddamn “Sign into the Federal Fucked Up Document System with your FFUDS PIN now” things that just don’t actually work. The layers of garbage between you and renewing an amateur radio certificate is truly Idiocratic.

    • nickiwest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This sounds very similar to the Kentucky online portal for teacher certification. It looks like it was made in 1996, and it functions slightly less well than it looks like it should.

  • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Time Cube (now archived). I feel bit bad saying it, but omg the layout. It was bad even by 90s standards.

    Edit: the creator died in 2015.

    Edit2: CW, anti-queer rhetoric, but I find it very hard to take it seriously in the midst of waves hands vaguely at the rest of the website

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I finally got my appleTV subscription cancelled, and that took three fucking tries. No, I don’t have an iPhone or an appleTV unit, so I’m now free.

  • Battle Masker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Publisher’s Clearing House.

    So this company has ads on local free tv stations in the US about how you could win $5000 a week for life, but when you go to the website it’s like 97% ads and maybe 2% contests, and some contests are straight up unenterable if you have an adblocker. Then before you can officially enter, you have to go through 3 pages of ‘as seen on tv’ crap that it tries to sell you before you can finish entering. Also it lags like a motherfucker with or without an adblocker, cause there’s so many ads taking up that much bandwith, cause heaven forbid a webpage ad be a static image. And of course you have to have an account, so your spam folder and paper mailbox fill up with the worst things possible.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    literally any restaurant website. I disabled Facebook from my entire network (pihole).

    I can no longer order food on a website because Facebook is deadzoned.

    Also, about half of big box brick and mortar online stores stopped working as well.

  • elephantium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s hard to pick out one as THE worst, but generally, if I have to use the site for some external reason, the experience is awful.

    Health insurance, doctor’s offices, etc are generally pretty bad. Oddly, tax sites aren’t as rough.

    Also oddly, vacation related websites are awful.

    • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Ugh, still to this day, persistant file storage is either “the cloud” or file APIs that altho secure, don’t allow for saving overtop of existing files. really annoying.

  • 1hitsong@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    2 days ago

    Seemingly every recipe website. They tell a long, unrelated story, cover the page with ads, popups, slideouts, timer triggered ads, videos, etc.

    It’s almost impossible to see the recipe under all the crap.

    • Shard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      These were some of the first sites to be enshittified. The more you scroll that more ad revenue they got. So they hid the actual recipes and steps under a back story longer than the dune books that forced you to scroll and hit ad after ad.

      • slingstone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        A lot of these have a link near the top to go straight to the recipe, which helps me avoid much of the dreck.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    2 days ago

    Pintrest is the worst website ever built and has caused immense damage to the free sharing of information.

    • Battle Masker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      me: oh hey I was looking for–

      Pinterest: Sign in or I will come to your house and break your thumbs

      me: well fuck you too then

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      I legitimately don’t know why Google hasn’t filtered it out of image search results. It’s harmful to Google’s platform.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s the top rated blocked website on Kagi.

        I don’t know why Google doesn’t take a hint.

        • irotsoma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Used to be an easy way to collect and share photos or something from a website with friends. It was especially useful with things like making a collection of fashion that you liked and then discussing similar fashions with friends. It actually at one point would recognize some pieces of clothing and then create links to buy it. Actually a useful advertising kind of thing IMHO. But it became bloated and full of tracking nonsense rather than helping people share things and so it lost its usefulness. It seems it’s mostly populated by bots now to drive SEO.

    • anothermember@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      The only way I’ve worked out how to even save Instagram images locally is using the page information (ctrl+i) Media tab in Firefox and sort through it to find it there. Terrible for an image hosting website.

      • hogmomma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not an image hosting site, it’s a social media site whose goal is to keep you coming back for more. The easier it is for you to save their content locally, the less likely you are to spend as much time on their site.

          • hogmomma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            If you’re running Windows, though, you can use the Snipping Tool to grab the part of the screen you want to save, which may or may not have an image in it.