Strange charge port placement… aka exactly where the gas tank is on half of normal ICE vehicles. They then try to justify it being strange because Americans don’t back into parking spots most of the time, which is of debatable importance to start with. Then try to say it’s just because it fit Elon’s garage better… But never point out that it’s also where 50% of people are used to their gas cap being already.
People constantly complain online that EVs do things different just because. Tesla doesn’t make a change and leaves things familiar and people also complain. The only possible objectively better placement is which side would be street side parking. But even then that would change depending on which side of the road you drive on still, so people would still complain.
For Tesla, until 2024, charging infrastructure was something Tesla built out on their own with the Supercharger network, not something they relied on third parties for. So it didn’t matter where it was placed since they controlled 99.9% of the charging anyway. They built the chargers with the port location already in mind, and that infrastructure didn’t need to consider anyone else because no one else was using Tesla’s connector despite it being openly available. Now that it’s a standard everyone else is adopting they’re having to update the existing locations to better support other car designs, that has nothing to do with where the port is on Tesla vehicles.
The Tesla connector was NOT openly available until late 2022, and wasn’t a fully published standard until 2024. They originally wanted a hefty licensing concession from other vendors. Specifically, they would only license it if they joined a patent pool.
In fact, the current NACS connector isn’t even electrically the same as the one Tesla used in 2021. Superchargers are backwards compatible, but they have to support multiple standards. It also means that older Teslas can’t use the growing network of NACS chargers without an upgrade.
Other companies being unwilling to accept the licensing terms doesn’t mean the option was unavailable.
Either way though, none of that has anything to do with port placement, which is what the article is trying to claim is strange for whatever reason.
charge ports should always be on the right, because it allows street side charging. VW is the only one who’s got this right.
This is really the only valid argument for moving it. But even then, it would depend on what side of the street you drive on, albeit that would be a smaller issue since you’d only have the British and a few other former colonies that still drive on the wrong side to worry about.
The simpler answer is just that street side parking and charging wasn’t really a factor when this was being determined. Hell, third party charging at all wasn’t really a thing.
The expectation was you’d have a garage at home and you’d install a charger, or the Superchargers which were designed for the charger location. One of the primary advantages of an EV is always having a full charge when you need it, not having to stop to charge unless you’re on a trip. Tesla built their charging infrastructure themselves, so they had complete control over that, and none of them use on street parking. The expectation was people buying $80k+ vehicles will probably have a garage and can install a home charger. The cheaper models came way after that.
What’s wrong with reverse parking?
- Backwards parking is actually easier because your front wheels turn.
- It’s better for your future self. Backing out of a parking spot with reduced visibility is harder and can be dangerous.
- Overall safety. I used to work in a company where reverse parking was mandatory because in case of an emergency the parking lot could be evacuated faster.
- Better visibility when leaving the parking spot is safer for other traffic participants
I’m interested in knowing more about where you worked that had that detailed of an evacuation plan. I know that emergency services (police, etc) do that in case a call comes in, but that’s not exactly an evacuation.
I’m on this level about it: https://matthewdicks.com/2016-8-1-backing-into-a-parking-spot/
I have to mention I have a reverse camera with guidance lines. I can back into a parking spot nearly as fast and swift as I do forward parking.
Very valid points and I park reversed most of the time as well. However slanted parking is quite common in store fronts.
I saw slanted parking for the first time in an underground garage. It was so much easier to park and get out. I guess they probably lose one parking spot on each row with it, but technically the rows can be narrower.
If you don’t have to do it for a valid reason (safety), I’d say you are pretty much just inconveniencing everyone around you.
How? If you’re not backing into your spot when parking, you’ll be backing out when leaving the spot.
tldr
musk rented some place. the location on the car was most convenient to him.
tltldr
muski is a narcissist asshole
Without even reading, I thought, “on a whim?” The answer, unsurprisingly, is yes.
I’m actually disappointed its not frat-boy humor. Just more of, even when he’s actually pragmatic, its in a way that everyone else has to live with.
We’ve always got his model names for the juvenile humor.
Nah. It was juvenile of them to insist the E had to be a 3, as if children would be the ones buying the cars.
Wow, such a bold claim when you don’t know what you’re talking about about.
Ford already had the rights to a vehicle named “Model E”. So the closest way to achieve the similar design language they wanted was a stylized 3… Which also worked since it was their third model (excluding the roadster which was no longer made).
That’s because Ford would have sued the dogshit out them.
