Donald Trump fired off an angry middle-of-the-night attack on “highly overrated Jewish Governor” Josh Shapiro after he spoke out against the former president at the Democratic National Convention on Wednesday night.

  • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    190
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ah yes the strategy of trying to court jewish Americans by *checks notes* being blatantly antisemitic. There’s no real reason to mention he’s Jewish here other than to be antisemitic and imply he’s a “bad jew”

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      At this point there is no chance of “court(ing)” enough voters to win. MAYBE when all anyone knew of Biden was a guy who chugged a bottle of nyquil before a debate for some reason but even america isn’t stupid enough to legitimately vote in trump anymore.

      If trump wins it will be because of decades of gerrymandering and outright election theft through court cases, bad faith electors, and violence.

      And shit like this? This is the threat. Explain that anyone who breaks ranks is going to be just as much of a target as pence was.

      Hell, I wouldn’t be shocked if we have a “Jan 6 was a day of patriotism” ad before this 70-something days is up.

      • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        85
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        but even america isn’t stupid enough to legitimately vote in trump anymore.

        I’m afraid you’re vastly underestimating the stupidity of Americans. I just hope enough people vote.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          4 months ago

          They’re stupid enough when it comes to not voting at all. If everyone showed up and voted for who they prefer, no Republican would ever be president again (unless they pivot away from being the Fascist Party).

            • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              4 months ago

              One thing there that shouldn’t be discounted is how hard it was for folks working multiple jobs, who have to take care of their kids, etc to be able to get to a voting booth.

              Long lines, inaccessible mail in voting, and so on have long been issues especially for the lower income bracket where they aren’t getting the option to work from home that day, or live in an area where there are so many booths that the line takes 10 minutes to get through.

              So I wouldn’t say its all “stupid” people who don’t vote. These were intentional decisions made by others trying to limit access to voting, and in the past, it worked. The moment mail in voting became ubiquitous, there was a massive increase in voters.

              Pushing for keeping options open for everyone to vote, including making it a federal holiday, consistently available mail in voting, ensuring access to sufficient booths, etc, is of utmost importance.

              • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                It’s a shame that in a supposed “free country” that all voting is not done like it’s done here in Colorado.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        My parents seem like normal somewhat rational people. They are still planning to vote for Trump. Please stop with this “we’ve already won” shit. It can only cost us the win. Go vote. It’s far from guaranteed. It honestly looks to be pretty close to an even race right now.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago
          1. Your parents are not “somewhat rational people” if they are voting for a hateful bigot and rapist who is openly compromised by foreign powers and openly talking about how people only have to vote “one more time”
          2. Please read posts before responding to them
          3. We have popular republicans speaking at the DNC and getting cheered. There was a LOT of stupidity about Biden (“He is anti-Palestine so we should let trump win instead!”) but he is gone and there is no time to make a proper attack against Kamala. trump is not going to sway additional voters and is already losing “moderates” who are desperate for anything other than a rapist lunatic who would love Gilead if he knew how to read.

          That is why the focus is on strong arming his party and elected officials to remind them that he led a literal fucking lynch mob against the last republican who crossed him by… not shitting on the constitution on Jan 6.

          if trump wins it is not going to be by a popular vote (it was never going to be that). It is not even going to be by barely squeaking by on the electoral college. It is going to be by getting close and then using outright theft and violence to get the rest of the way.

          Which is why, even if someone is too stupid to understand that there are down ballot candidates who matter just as much (arguably moreso), they still need to vote. Because we need a landslide so that there are no elected (or military…) officials who decide that they want to be on “the winning team” and defy the will of the people. And that is who trump is campaigning to at this point.

          • slickgoat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Almost half the country will vote for the orange ape. Don’t other this guy’s parents. If everyone voted the country wouldn’t be in this situation anyway. Take 40% out of the voting pool (not even counting voter suppression) and the ill-informed will vote alongside the hyper-informed.

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              His parents are actively supporting a bigoted rapist who wants to destroy the country and become king.

              They deserve some other-ing.

              • slickgoat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                That tribal rubbish is how we got into this bullshit in the first place. We need to reach out into their community, not declare fellow Americans outlaws.

                • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Yes, the real problem is the people who don’t respect others right to… decide that people deserve to be persecuted for the color of their skin or what they have between their legs.

                  Fuck off with that. I someone is supporting a violent bigoted rapist then they SHOULD be a fucking outlaw.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s a rational view, but not born out by past experience. Sadly, there are apparently a huge number of horrible Americans who still think Trump is exactly right.

        Hillary got flak for calling Trump supporters a “basket of deplorables,” but in hindsight that was a kind way of saying it.

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      All the american zionist apartheid colonists will still support him, though, because he also hates the other people more.

    • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Wait! He can’t be antisemitic, his son in law is Jewish! /s

      And he has on multiple occasions told Jews they have to have their head checked if they vote Democrat, instead of the group with tiki torches chanting about how 'Jews will not replace us". He is also currently on a KKK campaign stop tour which makes this land even better.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    trump really wanted Kamala to pick this guy as VP, it’s why it’s not the first time he’s brought Shapiro up and why he even knows his name.

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      4 months ago

      Shapiro would have given him so much material to work with. He would have called him a classic coastal elite, uppity lawyer, dyed-in-the-wool career politician. He would have called him an Obama impersonator.

      Walz is giving him no angles of attack, it’s really an inspired pick.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Walz is giving him no angles of attack, it’s really an inspired pick.

        But it’s the type of politicians the Dem party should always be running…

        Kamala is doing a lot better than Biden, but someone like Walz would be doing the Super Bowl Shuffle all the way to the White House without breaking a sweat.

        He’s the type of candidate our voters want, and how he went from completely unknown to ridiculously popular in like a month just shows that the “name recognition” stuff was always bullshit.

        Walz isnt unique. He’s great, but there’s lots of politicians out there like him. It’s just almost impossible for them to get to the national stage when the DNC, media, billionaires, and lobbists like AIPAC want neoliberals.

        • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          They’ll never come out and say it openly, but I sense a strong theme in the Harris campaign of “we’re also running to give the republican party the impetus to kick Trump and his cronies to the political nothingness that they deserve to be in”

          With so many people saying “I’m a republican but I’m voting for Harris”, it’s very clear that this election is just as much about Republican’s reclaiming their “grand ole’ party” from the cult of personality that has taken it over. It’s a shame that they have to literally vote with their opponent in order to make that happen. But the thought process seems to be “Let’s get dominated, spend the next four years purging ourselves of Trump and his idiotic sycophants, and then come back in the next election and fight with dignity again.”

          • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t disagree with your overall point, but let’s not pretend that the Republicans campaigned with dignity before Trump. Next time they’ll pick someone just as bad for America as Trump but he will be younger and controllable.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Trump wholely controls the RNC, they’re not working against him.

            Republican voters are willing to vote for Harris when they wouldn’t vote Biden, because Biden was just honestly a bad candidate. Now that the candidate is better, more people are willing to cross party lines and vote D.

            It would have happened in 2016 and 2020 too if we ran better candidates.

            Hell, it happened 2008 and 2012 when Obama ran. Not only did people vote for him. He flipped a lot of state governments in “red states” blue.

            Because he changed people’s minds about what the democratic party was.

            • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I get that. But there’s no way these people stay Democratic in four years time. Their purpose is to take Trump’s loss as a means to wrestle back their party from MAGA. They know that it’s the only way they have a chance to win in four years is IF they start a Republican civil war after this (hopefully) loss of a great deal of power.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                But there’s no way these people stay Democratic in four years time

                But there is…

                Run more popular candidates and count on Republicans to keep running the same shitty Republicans.

                We went from Obama (who wasn’t perfect as president, but a great candidate) to Hillary and Joe. And regardless of your opinion on them as presidents, most agree they were shit tier candidates.

                We dont have to start running shitty candidates, so we don’t have to lose those voters next election.

                It’s stupidly easy to beat Republicans, the money just doesn’t want what voters want. So the party aims for just popular enough to get elected, but still doing all the shitty stuff the money wants.

                If Republicans win every once and a while. It’s even better for the money, so they just don’t have any downsides.

                It’s why we desperately need to get money out of at least Dem primary’s like Bernie keeps saying.

          • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I never got the concept of Republicans going back to running honorable candidates. They haven’t since Lincoln. The Republican candidates for just this century have been a certified pedophile, a Mormon, a man who chose Sarah fucking Palin as his running mate, and Bush. Hell, before that you had Reagan, who if you wanna blame America’s problems on one man, he’s the one. You had Bush Sr., who wasn’t completely awful and was granted 1 term for it. You’ve got Nixon and Watergate. You’ve got Eisenhower being almost impressively racist.

            The Republican party hasn’t had a good candidate in decades, if not well over a hundred years. Were they less openly insane before? Sure. Were they actually less insane? Absolutely not. These are the people that manufactured the drug crisis, leading to the pointless deaths and arrests of thousands of black people.

            • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              I don’t disagree. But even the worst candidate (besides Trump) was still a human being. Trump jacked the evil up to a whole new level, because not only does he contain all the worst aspects of ALL of those other people, he doesn’t even have the shame or the tact to hide it behind “politicking”.

              Yes. It’s all a charade. Political candidates are humans who are selfish, arrogant and don’t always have their constituents best interests at heart; especially conservatives. But there was always an unspoken agreement to hide all of that behind professionalism, proper decorum, debate and policy arguments. We do that because the alternative is chaos. When the evil is laid bare for all to see, then civilization itself is no longer truly relevant. If Trump can get away with all this shit, well fuck it, then so can I. The entire country can YOLO.

              We pretend. We and our politicians share a pleasant fiction where they’re “just like us” because everything collapses hard once Pandora’s box is open.

              Trump’s danger lays not in what he says or does. But in the shameless, unapologetic way that he does and says it which emboldens every one of his sycophants to start doing the same. Hold him accountable, in any way necessary, and yes…those assholes are still going to exist in the republican party to some degree (They’re like cockroaches after all). But we might, just might get back to running the country with at least a faux sense of civility and proper debate.

        • Poayjay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Exactly. No one voted for Kamala. People didn’t vote for Biden, they voted against Trump. Hilary won the primary because Warren split the progressive vote and wouldn’t drop out.

          Dems haven’t put forward a truly clean and charismatic leader since Obama.

          • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Warren ran in 2020. Hillary won in 2016 because of superdelegate bullshit creating an air of inevitable victory before a single vote had been cast and the DNC actively working to suppress the Sanders campaign through smear tactics and a severely limited debate schedule.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yep.

            They saw trump and just saw an opportunity to do whatever they want because trump is terrible.

            So we get stuck with unpopular candidates the country had rejected multiple times. Because the people calling the shots in the party just really weren’t concerned about if trump won.

            Letting a progressive become president means they name the head of the DNC, and that has ripple effects throughout DNC leadership they’ll never be able to reclaim.

            So they’d always prefer a Republican president and them retaining power to a progressive Dem becoming president.

            We ain’t fighting the same fight party leadership is fighting.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          when the DNC, media, billionaires, and lobbists like AIPAC want neoliberals.

          …to add insult to injury, they often play the oppression olympics game at the same time, as if 1) that kind of stupid pandering even matters to most voters, and 2) they think no one will notice their shell game. As if people cannot tell the difference between a Condaleeza Rice and a Bernie Sanders, other than gender and race?

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 months ago

        Walz is giving him no angles of attack, it’s really an inspired pick.

        Republicans don’t have a counter for wholesome.

      • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        No, see Walz has some huge weaknesses that Trump and Vance can expose! He, errr… [checks notes] visited China and got addicted to a video games console for a while?

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      4 months ago

      But he specifically said he didn’t have a series of mini strokes, when nobody had asked. Claimed he was getting ahead of a rumor he said everybody was spreading when nobody had ever heard it.

      I think that clears it up.

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        He’s going to be a handful for his handlers when the big one hits him and his face drops on one side and he is only able to move about in a wheelchair

        • slickgoat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          There will be a Q drop saying that his stroke was just pretend, and all part of a brilliant Trump plan to take down the Libs.

          The Maggots will widely cheer!

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 months ago

    Picking a fight with another governor that has higher approval than he has in a state he must win? Please proceed, Don.

  • Plopp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 months ago

    What do they mean “goes off the rails”? The man hasn’t even seen a rail in over a decade, let alone been on one.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    I swear to GOD he’s trying to get out of getting elected but remain visibly hurt enough to get funding. He’s struck out and flipped off every demographic save for white Christian males. And he’s still pulling 49% at betting sites.

    • miraclerandy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      The fact that he still has Christian supporters is crazy to me from the beginning. He’s the definition of sin from their perspective and back in 2015 I was sure they would see that and feel uncomfortable about his lifestyle but NOPE!

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        We’re talking about people who have made their entire life’s identity around explicitly rejecting reality and their own observations.

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Internet says it’s from the 1200s

          Though lots of stuff associated with the bible was invented long after people think it was, so I guess this tracks.

          • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Well, it was a word in greek contemporary to the Bible’s writing.

            But I was wrong that it was invented there, it was apparently already in use to mean “actor” or “dissembler”…

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      If he does not get elected, he will see jailtime. He is just desperate and his run of dumb luck seems to be stalled at the moment.

      His strategy only works if people act in their short term self interest and don’t stand up to him.

      Enough people, (the Business Execs, the National Security Hawks, and the Petit Bourgeoisie) finally understand that, if he gets elected, this will their very last chance to vote.

      They are standing up to him. They are providing real support.

      The fact that she skipped the primaries means Harris avoided the normal Democratic Circular Firing Squad. She has a real chance.

      BTW, I just spent the week in South Georgia. Georgia is in play. I was in a bar listening to old white dudes argue hammer and tong about Trump. I have been going down there regularly for 10 years. That never happened before. In the last year and a half, the loud Pro-Trump people started keeping their mouths shut. Now, they do not give any outward signs of support.

      Trump lost GA last time.

  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Man, his frontal shots are insane. There was some cringe screenshot of a tiktok from his official channel on Lemmy and it was the first time I’ve seen him looking just like that, and then more and more in the last week or so. It’s amazing how this angle changes him. Like a masterfully carved statue or a theater mask akin to Hannya, employing a visual illusion to change the perceived emotion by tilting it. Central Don isn’t an orange hitler previous photos shown to scare dems into voting, now he’s a balding baby in distress, and I want to see more of that as article covers.

    • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      You have to wonder why he’s doing that, since he’s so image focused. My guess: he’s freaked out enough by the prospect of losing that he’s just trying anything to see what sticks

      • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Or that the policy in the media changed so all unlucky angles that were previously known as undesirable to every photographer are now allowed and even encouraged. It’s free for all to bash the cheeto. Not in a side shot, catching his ear, but right in his eyes.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    4 months ago
    Huffington Post - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for Huffington Post:

    MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/dnc-2024-live-updates_n_66c680dde4b0b9c7b36029d8/liveblog_66c6a1f1e4b0b9c7b3603a0d
    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-josh-shapiro-attack_n_66c6c18fe4b0f1ca4693cf4e

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support