• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    With ISRO coming on strong, and Russia alienating most of the world, I’m fascinated by what this could turn into in the next couple years

        • sleep_deprived@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          28 minutes ago

          If we stop doing business with SpaceX, we immediately demolish most of our capability to reach space, including the ISS until Starliner quits failing. Perhaps instead of trying to treat this as a matter of the free market we should recognize it as what it is - a matter of supreme economic and military importance - and force the Nazi fucker out.

          • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 minutes ago

            Sure. As long as he goes, I’ll support it all day long.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Thankfully SpaceX is MORE than just Elon. Unlike Twitter, where he’s removed everyone and turned it to slop. He makes no money from it, so why shouldn’t he fuck with it?

          SpaceX actually makes money. Elon won’t fuck it up. (Or he will, but atleast we will have learned an insane amount of things thanks to them.)

          • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            54 minutes ago

            I’m sure it makes money and he may not F it up, but that’s not the point. The point is that Elon has turned into the douche of the century along with his butt-buddy Trump.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Do you like modern tech? Do you like the chips in your device you’re using to comment right now? You can thank the space industry. Without Apollo we would still be 30 years behind in integrated circuit technology.

          • mojo_raisin@lemmy.bestiver.se
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            If I was given the choice by a genie, on the one side you have your laptop, Lemmy, car, etc, but millions of people an animals suffer, or on the other hand, our tech evolves more slowly and sustainably, I’d choose the latter every time.

            I’ll take being 30 years behind and still have <insert any species we’ve driven extinct>. An entitlement to the lives and well being of others for the sake of “progress” is pretty sick.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I’ll definitely boycott SpaceX now (puts “activist” in bio)

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      People pay good money for that ‘junk’. A quality internet connection basically anywhere in the world, including at sea and in very remote areas, is far from junk.

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah I’m going to agree with you on this one. It blows my mind that as a species we have changed the night sky. When I was a child seeing a satellite dart across the sky was exciting because it was as rare as a shooting star. Now I look up and see a satellite every few minutes. That said, there have been a few times recently that Star Link was the only method of communication I’ve had in remote areas. It has been very helpful. I think as poorly of Musk as much as the next person but I can at least recognize the ingenuity SpaceX and Star Link.

        • NebLem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Really Starlink should be absorbed into and ran by the UN. We only have so much LEO to use, one company is bound to become a monopoly and LEO is the world’s not any nation’s property.

          • 0x0@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The UN has no teeth by design and there’s a lot of money to be made privately, what makes you think it would happen?

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Fuck the UN.

            Seriously - when you choose a country with vile fundamental human rights abuses as the head of the human rights commission…

  • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    SpaceX launched about 429,125 kg of spacecraft upmass in Q1, followed by CASC with about 29,426 kg

    Smaller satellites (<1,200 kg) represented 96% of spacecraft launched in Q1, 76% of total upmass

    So the way I’m personally reading this is 2/3 of this is starlink launches

    • atocci@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Big respect to ISRO, but you read France’s Arianespace backwards. They were more of an X/5 situation.

      • Siegfried@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You are right… my head was looking for positive changes for some reason. What happened with france?

        • atocci@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Their primary launcher, the Ariane 5, was scheduled to be retired and replaced with the Ariane 6, but there were delays in the project. It left them with an awkward transition phase where no new Ariane 5s were being built, but Ariane 6 wasn’t ready yet, so all they could do was launch the last of the 5s.