- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmit.online
- europe@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmit.online
- europe@lemmy.ml
As it was planned ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
deleted by creator
They will come back. As they do every time. Just wait one or two election periods, then they’ll be back under new leadership, with yet another flashy advertising campaign targeting dumb first time voters, who will, once more, fall for that trick.
The FDP desn’t need many members nor many voters to maintain its financing, they get plenty of
donationsbribes in return for their services to the ultra rich. They can and will manage a few years with bad election results.I am honestly not too sure about that. The AFD has very similar positions and is able to actually win elections.
If they actually win enough to gain power, there won’t be any future election periods anymore.
I’d prefer not to contemplate that increasingly realistic possibility, but here we are.
Removed by mod
I think the no-confidence vote to make way for new elections isn’t the bad part here. The bad part is this insane idea, that he can be successful again, after having had to end his government prematurely.
The SPD already tried that move with Schröder. We got 16 years of Merkel out of it… And if the SPD would be anywhere close to the results Schröder achieved back then, they would party for three days straight.
That, too.
They aren’t only blatantly lying, they are stupid enough to believe their own lies.
On the other hand, I’m not that sad about the SPD’s demise. Since Schröder turned them into a CDU in red, they are redundant. The problem is that nothing filled the giant void that the SPD’s reinvention as just another neoliberal party has left.
deleted by creator
I’m genuinely surprised. Got too used to those bastards lying to me.
Still an epitome of democracy with virtually all votes being cast strictly along the party lines. Looks like those overpaid muppets are sitting there just to represent their party leaders, not the people.
deleted by creator
I know a few (former) SPD members who are quite pissed off at the party and what Schröder and Scholz turned it into. Their story is all the same. They are old-school social democrats who fail to see any social democracy in the party the SPD has become.
tl;dr: Don’t trust people on the internet ;)
I never have.
Source: Am a person on the internet.
deleted by creator
Unfortunately an old SPD tradition dating back more than a century…
deleted by creator
He asked his own people to vote this way to force new elections
deleted by creator
German member of his party… Am Primary source
deleted by creator
Trolling for rubles? :D
deleted by creator
Seriously though. I said he asked the party members, they did not oblige. Original commenter sucks Russian dick.
Yes, this is still massively dishonest, as the mechanism isn’t meant for willy-nilly forcing new elections just because the guy in front wants it so.
the mechanism isn’t meant for willy-nilly forcing new elections just because the guy in front wants it so.
That is exactly what this mechanism is for. The chancellor is literally the only person that can call for this kind of vote of confidence (Vertrauensfrage).
https://www.bundestag.de/services/glossar/glossar/V/vertrauensfrage-245558
You might be thinking of the constructive vote of no confidence, which is a different mechanism that allows parliament to elect a new chancellor.
https://www.bundestag.de/services/glossar/glossar/K/konst_misstrau-245482
And not a single one listend?

