• dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      It is depressing, but I try not to forget we are seeing a sort of survivorship bias of stupidity on the former Twitter at this point. The cohort of remaining posting accounts is dumber and dumber on average. And this dynamic is magnified in the replies, because they are paid blue accounts at the top. Eg, self-selected losers. (The top account has likely just hidden their checkmark)

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      Ah, that captures such a stark answer to why people use xitter though.

      It’s not “so I can hear from you” it’s “So YoU cAn HeAr FrOm Us!!!11oneone”

      Walled gardens? More like prison yard. Lol

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Good, now if only OpenSource devs switched from Discord to let’s say Matrix/XMPP

    We’d be partying

    • MashedTech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 hours ago

      go back to forums. Support in discord is awful. Discord is not as searchable as a forum public on the internet

      • Océane@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        Français
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 minutes ago

        I may sound too radical, but I’d go so far as to support a common Logseq knowledge graph.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah, forums please. I hate the idea of troubleshooting information being locked behind some stupid software we can’t easily index and search. Forums can be put on archive.org, you can literally print a page, or save it as a PDF for reviewing later. You can make use of bookmark software like Linkwarden to archive things.

        Discord? Not so much. You can use third party software to scrape it and save information, but no search engine can index it. Community building is great, but I loathe having to trawl through tonnes of blithering blathering conversation BS just to figure out where to find firmware for a particular chip I have is.

        Makes me want to projectile vomit all over the place, throw my computer out the window, and move to convent.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If we’re swapping out discord, please just go with Zulip… It’s FLOSS, and has a solid company backing it that actually cares about FLOSS (They even bought the product back, after it was sold to a company that was enshittifying it)/

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 hours ago

      God I hope I live to see the day. Discord at first appears like a good IRC wrapper, but the XP of actually using it is fucking gross.

  • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This is a great example of where linking to a blog post about an announcement is better than linking to the announcement itself:

    after digging a bit deeper, I discovered that there was originally a longer, more detailed announcement that was later scrapped. I found it in a GitLab commit made by Jean. [Link to GitLab comment in article]

    Good job, itsfoss.com

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I didn’t really need another reason to love Debian more but here we are… I’m donating to Debian today

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Yeay, Debian user here who also left Twitter/X for similar reasons. I was already on Mastodon and Bluesky but didn’t make a habit out of it. Leaving the bad platform entirely (and having my data archived and searchable) helped a lot.

    Glad to hear they moved on!

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Its that social inertia, and I get it.

      I ran a neighborhood group’s social media, and even after FB turned openly shitty, I had to stay on there, because thats where people are.

      I mean, I could have pushed the org to drop them, but then we would have lost the eyeballs of thousands of neighbor’s we’re trying to work FOR.

      Same deal with Twitter, they’ve just gotten to the point where most NPOs lose less by leaving than they would by staying.

      • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The problem is for organizations it’s harder to leave because that is where the people you want to reach are. That’s the only reason any org or company is on social media in the first place. If they leave too soon they risk too many people not seeing the things they send out to the community.

        It’s more an individual thing because so many people just have social inertia and haven’t left since everyone they know is already there. The first to leave have to decide if they want to juggle using another platform to keep connections or cut off connections by abandoning the established platform.

        • ericjmorey@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          That doesn’t explain why yhey don’t start a transition by posting to both the new platform and the old. And not including links to their new account on their websites.

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            If I ran an org, that needed to reach a community of say… 1000 people in need, and 900 of those people were ONLY on twitter, guess what?

            That org needs to be on twitter, even if President Musk is profiting from it. Otherwise, the org would be remiss in their mission.

              • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Not really a hypothetical though. Its the very reason I kept a non-profit’s account on twitter, and facebook, and instagram, for as long as I did - Because we HAD to in order to effectively hit the mission for the non profit.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      & all the US-based corporate social media… Facebook, Instagram, Threads, WhatsApp, Snapchat, Reddit, Discord, LinkedIn, & GitHub.

      The VC-funded ones too like BlueSky

  • That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    8 hours ago

    As it turns out, having an account on a social media platform full of Nazis, violent racists, and child diddlers is not good for business.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Personally, I think that the discussion around this will evolve as the news spreads, but I agree with Robert on this one. Sure, X/Twitter has become a less welcoming place than before, but shutting out a significant portion of your community without seeking their input first isn’t a sensible move for such a foundational open source project.

    Nah, I think I’m cool if Debian doesn’t respect the input of Nazi sympathisers.

    • fine_sandy_bottom
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah what the fuck is with that.

      It’s a very twitter centric view of the web. If you’re not on xitter you’re “shutting out a significant portion”.

      The thing is, it’s not simply that Musk has an ideology that is disparate from my own, he has an agenda that is egregiously contrary to the stated values of the Debian project.

      You’d consult with the community over a new logo or blog layout maybe, but on whether to assist Musk in his far right agenda there’s not really any decision to be made honestly.

    • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah, that section is bad.

      For one, it’s has classic vibe “if you want to keep the nazis out, you’re the one who’s exclusionary”.

      But also, how is refusing to engage on a platform “shutting out a significant portion of [the] community”? That sounds backwards to me. Blocking people from engaging with Debian on its own platforms would be shutting them out. The implication in the article is that Debian is obligated to be unconditionally present on every social platform its users might be on.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The other twist is, unlike Xitter, you don’t have to create an account on Mastodon to be able to read their feed. You can access it like any other website. So nobody is getting shut out. They’re just posting elsewhere, where anyone can read it.

  • hulfpa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Now I wish they had an ARM Qualcomm distro. Been hoping for a Linux distro for my Snapdragon X Elite machine. Now Debian had taken a stand for something they will probably be my distro once there is Linux support for my machine!

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Debian already has an ARM version. Do you mean some Qualcomm drivers are missing? There are already Ubuntu ROMs for Android phones, so this shouldn’t be an issue, right?