• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    15 hours ago

    A good move. Nip that shit in the bud right now.

    The mobile stores are fucking unusable, a sea of ad-ridden garbage.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I just deny most mobile games the network permission, though obviously this doesn’t work if you actually need any internet access (and I don’t think all devices give you control over that permission)

  • .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Haven’t seen a game that uses ads like this, but very good that it’s strictly prohibited now. That shit should never have taken off on mobile, but alas. At least we can prevent it on PC.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Well you can prevent it on Steam. And I don’t think Epic really have an ad network to abuse for this either.

      If you see Google launch a “free game only” store for PC, get worried. Although Google being Google, it will be deleted within two years anyway.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I read that games with ads were already banned from Steam a long time ago. That explains why we don’t have more junk in the Steam store. Judging by how many never completed early access asset flip games there are, it would be a complete cesspool with ad-supported games. Good decision by Valve.

  • Rikj000
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    That’s nice and all,
    but when will they tackle loot boxes?

    That shit has pushed plenty of minors into gambling addictions, but they don’t crack down on it, since they get a sweet cut of it all.

    Valve in general isn’t the worst company,
    but they’re far from innocent as well.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      They won’t, because loot boxes are their main source of income.

      And this is exactly why “good companies” like Valve cannot save us. Good companies will never be a substitute for good regulations.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I get the hate for lootboxes, but as a casual who hasn’t played PC games in forever…what makes the lootbox mechanic any worse than CCGs?

      Couldn’t it be said that MtG and other CCGs have been guilty of the exact same thing since their inception?

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        There two big differences to me are scale and value. A ccg has rare cards, but they aren’t actually that rare compared to loot boxes. Loot boxes tend to have both lower drop rates and pollute their drops with lots of garbage, even for rare drops. Secondly, physical cards have value, you can sell or trade them, you can buy singles of cards you want. You can use them for things other than the game as well.

        • AngryMob@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Aside from drop rates everything you said applies to Valve too. Counter Strike skins can be traded or sold for real cash (tied to steam wallet, but still), and you can purchase singles of what you want.

          I know other games loot boxes dont follow this, but its interesting for the sake of comparison.

      • ysjet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        CCGs hasn’t had a massive, massive Epic Games-paid astroturfing campaign against valve/steam like ‘lootboxes’ has. That’s the difference.

    • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I agree with the overall sentiment, however:

      Lootboxes are at least a conscious action you must take. They definitely have the same problems as gambling (because that’s what they are), but you can also choose not to engage with them. Ads however, are forced upon you, and do things that you cannot see (track you) and cannot turn off.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      when will they tackle loot boxes?

      Once loot boxes stop buying yachts.

  • Obelix@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Let me guess: Valve was not getting their cut from the ad money?

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They are not, but they could have made it so. Instead they chose the win for everyone.

      • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Two things can be true at once:

        1. valve so far took tremendous care of the people using their product. They have outclassed afaik every other billion dollar company in the world in terms of listening to their customers and not exploiting them to hell (as others do).
        2. billionaire companies are cancer. If gabe ever gives up valve (through death or whatever), we are at the mercy of a monopolist that can extract as much as they want.

        My conclusion: force companies to behave like valve does now, but forever. Let them make money without exploiting people. And in case if valve: break any monopoly.

        Down with shareholder value.

          • Agrivar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            She’s my senator as well, and I love what she’s doing - but THAT bill is ~7 years old and dead in the water given the current administration. :-/

            • Katana314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              18 hours ago

              There’s an alternative, to make it popular with the American people. Republicans look bad to their constituents each time they vote against policies that would relieve the American people as a whole, such as net neutrality and healthcare for all.

              Make some noise about it! Make it known that Democrats fight for everyone, and that a certain sect is very vocally rejecting that fight.

              • Blackmist@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                But they don’t fight for everyone. If they did, maybe they wouldn’t be in this state.

          • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            That would be a great solution. Another would be to put quotas of employees, customers, owners and the community (people living around a plant for example) in there. Just an idea though.

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      something like this would also harm their business in general. Garbage like that has no place anywhere.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Garbage like that has no place anywhere.

        If app developers can’t get money from paid apps, then it makes sense to run ads. Especially if they do offer a paid (ad-free) version.

        But if it’s a paid app already, like in Steam, it should definitely be ad-free.