• Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    vor 4 Tagen

    I’ll add that to my $5,000 DOGE dividend. Why do news outlets report what he says when he’s obviously lying?

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      vor 4 Tagen

      I’ll bet money that he’s going to actually try to do this.

      Remember when Congress voted to send Americans assistance checks during the pandemic — and Trump plastered his name all over those checks for shameless political points?

      This guy 100% wants to send out “Trump” checks again.

      • khepri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        vor 3 Tagen

        Yeah, I think he both really wants to do it, and at the same time is absolutely lying about having done any actual work or planning to make it happen. Trump love nothing more than to just hang stuff out there, knowing full well he’ll capture the news cycle whether or not anything actually has a chance of happening here. But literally the entire country is now governed based on a large group of cronies and enablers trying to interpret his stray demented thoughts, so I’m not sure what we expected.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      vor 4 Tagen

      Because in theory that’s just what news outlets should be doing. He says something and they should bring that to the people. Whether or not it is a lie or the public considers it a lie is not news YET. We’re better of receiving this information even if we know it to be a lie because we should be up to date of whatever the turd is saying.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        vor 4 Tagen

        No, it really isn’t. That’s a press release. Or the Truth post Trump made.

        News filters for worthy events, explains mechanics, and adds other context to help its readers understand why this thing is worth knowing and what it might mean.

  • Joeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    vor 4 Tagen

    What’s high income 30k a year or more? Such a joke…

    The $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms, in lots of ways, George," Bessent told anchor George Stephanopoulos. “You know, it could be just the tax decreases that we are seeing on the president’s agenda – you know, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans.”

    Oh so no money for you

    • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      vor 4 Tagen

      So what this means is there will be no $2000 check. It will just be “hidden” relief that is almost impossible to actually see and verify. Cool cool cool

      • Joeffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        vor 4 Tagen

        That’s what I get out of it… something they can say they did… but its actually nothing…

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        vor 3 Tagen

        Its represented by any social service he does not gut. Seriously we are running month over month deficits at historical highs. There is no dividend.

    • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      vor 4 Tagen

      These are all measures which reinforce some negative aspects of US economy, apart from social security taxes.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      vor 4 Tagen

      They want to let us deduct our auto loans? I haven’t heard that one yet. My car payment is crazy high though lol

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    vor 4 Tagen

    Trump steals people’s money, then gives some back to them, and that’s supposed to pacify them?
    How about not stealing people’s money to begin with?

    • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      vor 4 Tagen

      and that’s supposed to pacify them?

      Every single MAGAt will instantly forget any complaints the second they have a check in hand.

      • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        vor 4 Tagen

        It doesn’t actually sound like anyone will get a check “lots of ways” probably means it’s never going to happen, but all the MAGAs will point to him just saying this and gushing about how generous he is

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          vor 4 Tagen

          That’s weird, because the COVID checks were insanely popular and just giving everyone a $2000 check with his name on it would be great politics. I guess it’s good they’re doing it differently.

          • TheFogan@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            vor 4 Tagen

            Well you have to factor 2 things, there still was a battle with congress to get those checks out during covid. (I remember Bernie walking into congress with the massive printout of trumps tweet saying he was going to send out checks), and of course factoring in that trump knew he wanted to get elected again. It’s 3 years away from the next presidential election… and him getting a 3rd term probably doesn’t involve an election.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            vor 4 Tagen

            that was pretty much hamstrung by lich mcconnel, who laughed at the idea of giving poors anything, hes worst than trump by the way, until THE LICH WAS PRESSURE to vote on it.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      vor 3 Tagen

      “I pay $1,000 more a month per rent than when trump first took office, pay 20% more taxes but he did send me a one time check for $2000”

      Also the news should compare it to similar promises like “free fertility treatment” that he abandoned as soon as the news cycle was over.

  • khepri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    vor 3 Tagen

    How about “There is Zero Evidence of $2000 Trump Checks Beyond Mere Words” as the headline ABC? Christ. Or “Trump Floats Idea of $2000 Checks, Or Maybe It’s a Tax Rebate, Or Maybe Nothing, Or Maybe He Just Says Shit and We Eat It Up Every Time. Who Cares? Just Stay Scared and Don’t Change That Dial!”

  • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    vor 4 Tagen

    $2000 a person won’t even offset the additional cost from the ACA subsidy reduction. So, a one-time check that would only cover several months of the recurring cost that he’s given us.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      vor 4 Tagen

      When you’re that rich, $2000 and $0 are basically the same. It’s a pittance for what they see as an underclass of poors.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        vor 4 Tagen

        I think a lot of people don’t get this.

        Imagine there’s something that you want–maybe a lot, maybe only a little. What that something is doesn’t matter.

        What amount of money would you consider to be a negligible amount for you to spend to get that thing you want? Maybe it’s a few dollars or maybe it’s as little as 10 cents. For me, now that I am reasonably comfortable, anything that only costs about a dollar, I consider to basically be free.

        This is how the wealthy view anything that is “only” in the thousands of dollars.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        vor 3 Tagen

        for rich and poor alike. Its only relavent for people who are just getting by. If your staring down homelessness it will be delayed for a month. The government was shutdown for longer.

  • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    vor 4 Tagen

    Lol, bet he’s only saying this so when the Supreme Court comes down on his illegal tariffs he can say he was going to give us that money.

    • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      vor 4 Tagen

      Technically, If the Supreme Court rules that his tariffs were illegal to begin with, he will be expected to reimburse everyone affected. That may be all this is. He’s just trying to spin it as spontaneous generosity, rather than a court ordered obligation.

  • gandalf_der_12te
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    vor 4 Tagen

    i believe it when i see it. he’s announced the same thing back in may and nothing happened.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      vor 3 Tagen

      He’s just doing what Republican administrations have had to do over the past 20 years and bribing people with cash payments right near the end of their term after wrecking the economy.

  • DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    vor 4 Tagen

    Just ballparking that there are 250 million non-high-earners, at $2k a pop that’s $500 billion. Two thousand dollars won’t change anyone’s life, but $500bn is a big chunk of the federal budget.

    • gandalf_der_12te
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      vor 4 Tagen

      $2k is a whole lot of money, especially if you consider that most people will immediately spend it, so other people will earn it. a dollar goes much further than only one dollar if it moves through many hands.

      also, what do you think is the total cost that tariffs have cost you since january?

  • Splount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    vor 4 Tagen

    In two weeks. Very special. Don’t want to say much now but it’s gonna be really special.

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      vor 4 Tagen

      The Trump 2 week chicken taco timeline.

      He started with “solving crime in Chicago in 1 day”

      Then they had a Medicare plan just a week away, but he learned that that was too close for the right wing spin machine.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    vor 4 Tagen

    The ultra wealthy already got their ‘tariff dividend’, in the form of not tax breaks and a discrete heads-up of when to play the market to real maybe amounts of extra wealth.

    As for the rest, this offer is just more bullshit. If it does surface (which is very unlikely) there will be some strings attached. And it will in no way fully compensate most people for the turmoil caused by these tariffs.

  • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    vor 4 Tagen

    He says a lot of things. Meanwhile he’s gone out of his way repeatedly to try to starve millions of people.