The privacy sub may be even more paranoid than the stim subs.

This haunts them in their sleep:

programming-communism

  • jaeme@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    1 year ago

    Privacy sub… Iphone

    What a lack of computer literacy and libre software thought does to a mf.

      • jaeme@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        1 year ago

        Android is leagues ahead of Apple, first of all, the core of Android is libre, anyone is able to take Android and create their own mobile operating system around it (with various amounts of success). Of course, this leads to OEMs who create bastardized nonfree operating systems with privacy holes, but it also leads to things like Vanilla Android, GrapheneOS, CalyxOS, /e/ etc.

        There are also GNU/Linux phones like UBports, GNOME/KDE mobile shell, so it’s not a binary decision.

        Android is not without its flaws (like Google play services and closed down hardware), but to say it’s not better than Apple is misleading. Countries choose Android, only America pushes their Apple sludge.

        • ChaosMaterialist [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          1 year ago

          Every cell phone, even dumb phones, can track you with a warrant or Stingray. Rather than picking which is better, understand that every single cellphone is snitching on you and act accordingly.

          • YearOfTheCommieDesktop [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            To be clear, it is possible to defend yourself, but ofc no defense is perfect. For illegal activities that might attract federal attention? best to avoid them at all costs. But for general privacy in your day to day life that isn’t practical for most people, and “every cellphone is snitching on you” is way too reductive, even if it’s true in a sense.

            For example the person you are replying to mentions Linux phones, many of which publish schematics and make hardware kill switches for the discrete modem a big selling point. That still isn’t perfect protection, but it would protect you from a stingray… and if you have a thought out threat model, you can make the choice whether or not that device is appropriate for your situation.

            • ChaosMaterialist [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              1 year ago

              Let me be clear first: If you want to get rid of advertising, then yes your advise is OK. If you want to defend against the Surveillance system, it’s not close to adequate. This is the fundamental gap I’m trying to address.

              I understand where your heart is at, but you are making a mistake. Free/Libre software is about Freedom, and from that guarantee we can build other guarantees about security and privacy. However Freedom itself does not guarantee security nor privacy. Freedom is also the freedom to shoot yourself in the foot.

              To be clear, it is possible to defend yourself, but ofc no defense is perfect.

              There is a perfect defense: Don’t use technology. Much of this advise is trying to use technology to fight technology. It’s a rabbit hole that has no bottom, and the best defense is to not play. The problem is attack surface. Technology is incredibly complex and is chattier than your extroverted :LIB: friend at brunch, and boy howdy kitty-cri-texas do people love to listen! You can reduce this attack surface, but it never goes away as long as you are using technology.

              But for general privacy in your day to day life that isn’t practical, and “every cellphone is snitching on you” is way too reductive, even if it’s true in a sense.

              Here’s the trail crumbs you might make on the Web as you browse each and every website:

              1. DNS request - sends URL domain/hostname (www.hexbear.net, for example), collects IP and timestamp. Your ISP is often the default DNS, so they are collecting this information. Google (8.8.8.8) and Cloudflare (1.1.1.1) as well.
              2. 1st party HTTP(S) request - Encrypts body but sends URL domain/hostname in the clear across the network, collects IP and timestamp.
              3. 3rd party request - Usually advertising, but also could be security (Sign In With Google, Okta, etc), collects IP and timestamp
              4. 3rd party cookies - Sent and updated with every request to that domain (Amazon cookie to Amazon.com, FB cookie to Facebook.com, etc), collects IP and timestamp
              5. 1st party advertising - Think Amazon’s “Customers also bought…”, has full access to your request, collects IP and timestamp and User-Agent.
              6. Logs - Usage data about what you do on the website, both front-end and back-end, collects IP and timestamp
              7. Telemetry - Usage data about what you do with your app, collects IP and timestamp

              You can use custom software for #3 and #4 on the device (most of the advise here), but do you block google.com? You can use a network DNS blocker (e.g. Pi-Hole) for #1, #3, #4, and some of #7, but that only works on networks you control. VPNs advertise as solving #2, but that’s pure ideology; it only moves where the routing traffic goes and still can log information in transit.

              This also ignores data brokers who buy all of this information and compile it together.

              And this is just the advertising/surveillance defense against tech companies. I haven’t even touched cop or fedposting defense.

              • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                if your threat is state-level actors your computer security is approximately moot and maybe you should spend your money on laywers and having a discreet way out of the country

                • ChaosMaterialist [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s not necessarily true. Police are purchasers of this data from data brokers. It’s state surveillance without any need for a warrant.

                  Our research for this report involved interviewing experts on this issue and reviewing approximately 150 publicly available documents covering awards, solicitations, requests for proposals, and related information on contracts. We found significant evidence of agencies exploiting loopholes in existing law by purchasing data from private data brokers. The practice has prompted scrutiny from government watchdogs as well as members of Congress (Tau, 2021a; Wyden, 2021).

                  The problem is a byproduct of the lucrative private market for personal data, where many companies that offer online services collect, analyze, and sell data about individuals using those services. This data is aggregated by companies called ‘data brokers’ that typically lack any direct relationship with the individuals whose data they collect and sell, but may accumulate personal data from multiple sources with varying degrees of granularity, ranging from anonymized trends to the specific locations of individuals at specific times. Advertisers, retailers, and other companies may then seek access to data for varied commercial purposes.

                  As our research demonstrates, law enforcement and intelligence agencies are among the customers of some data brokers, spending millions of dollars to gain access to private sector databases which often contain very sensitive and very personal information on individuals.

        • YearOfTheCommieDesktop [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m with you on libre stuff, but I would say it’s not any better than Apple unless you are actually using one of the options you mention. Essentially every OEM available in western countries (and probably most other countries but idk) jam it full of spyware and telemetry, both the default google kind and all kinds of OEM and carrier-based additional spyware which is also often horribly insecure.

        • xXthrowawayXx [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know your hearts in the right place about this, but android is not better than iOS for privacy.

          The only way android can be made decently privacy respecting is through graphene and that requires a very small subset of the ocean of android devices and requires that you give up almost everything that makes a smartphone useful.

          The solution to privacy isn’t graphene or android, it’s not using a smartphone at all.

          • combat_brandonism [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            and requires that you give up almost everything that makes a smartphone useful

            that’s hyperbolic, I use graphene and rarely use the profile I’ve got their play services shim enabled in. the only thing I have found myself entirely unable to use so far is google pay for event tickets that require it, which isn’t often.

              • combat_brandonism [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                idk which features you mean, but you can get the google camera app and sideload it. highly recommend doing that

                most if not all ML features like photo manipulation or whatever else are going to run on google’s servers, so yeah you’re not going to get that. not what I think of when I read ‘everything that makes a smartphone useful’

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is leagues ahead if you are literate enough to wipe off the original firmware and get your own in it.

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Its fine if you are not literate to install a custom ROM. Use the defaults.

            I have mine modified, no need for a second job, just 30 minutes of research once.

    • Parsani [love/loves, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the kind of drivel which gets posted to that sub regarding why they should care China is “stealing their data” :

      if they get enough data, then they can use machine learning to find patterns effectively reading the mind of an average american. The govt can then push specially crafted propaganda aimed at destroying your faith in country, and seed ideas like resisting the chinese is in vain and you should surrender.

      With enough time the population will get weaker and starts to fear any retaliation against the chinese because they are TOO STRONG (they are in your mind). Without public support Democratic govts can’t do shit ultimately causing US to crumble down and even taken over by chinese.

      Data is dangerous.

      I’d like to think this is a joke because I would write something like this as a bit, but I’ve seen a similar argument 1000 times by now.

      One of the senators in the tiktok hearing basically insinuated that China was installing a communism activation word in the heads of Americans.

      To put it mildly, Americans are not an intellectual people.

      • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        if they get enough data, then they can use machine learning to find patterns effectively reading the mind of an average american.

        It’s not hard you just take literally any issue no matter how pointless or obvious the solution and half the country will think it’s good and the other half will think it’s bad. America can only process new problems through the lens of adversarial politics where nothing can get done. Ultimately because the US constitution is the worst legal framework in history so they can’t campaign on actual policy

        the complicated statistical analysis necessary to predict American patterns is a coin flip. Of course the UK is simpler just ask what would an incredibly corrupt person do and there you have it the UK government

        and the Chinese wouldn’t want to intrude in the excellent job the US government is doing at destroying American faith in their country

      • SkingradGuard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        if they get enough data, then they can use machine learning to find patterns effectively reading the mind of an average american. The govt can then push specially crafted propaganda aimed at destroying your faith in country, and seed ideas like resisting the chinese is in vain and you should surrender.

        That’s not how “machine learning” works. Do they think they live in a marvel movie?

      • SuperZutsuki [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t need special algorithms to read the mind of the average American. The American brainpan consists of “car good, racism, queerphobia, kill the homeless, CONSUME” and that really covers 99% of what goes on in the average American’s head.

      • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        effectively reading the mind of an average american

        “hot diggedy damn! i sure as shootin’ have a hankerin’ for a tasty burger!” fires revolvers into the sky

      • Karyoplasma
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        One of the senators in the tiktok hearing basically insinuated that China was installing a communism activation word in the heads of Americans.

        Gosh, that Italian family at the next table sure is quiet.

    • EatPotatoes [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think the cretin making the post on reddit-logo can adequately explain why they are so terrified without resorting to blatant racism and westoid fantasies. But the existential crisis for the west is that capitialism has run out of road with data, attention and platforms the last all important commodities to shape and dominate what is left of the economy. Your attention is a zero sum game for them and the data is the all important fuel.

      The majority of people have huge data footprints with fragments of themselves everywhere. Yet is there any real example of blackmail with all this data? I remember reading a quater of Soshana Zuboff’s Surveillience Capitialism before I could take no more of needlessly prolonged lib storytelling. Are there any worse examples of this specifically ruining somebodies life other then a ruined engagement? Like if somebody who made it to the end of that drivel enlight us that would be great or correct me where I am worng about data.

      • Orbital [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Surveillience Capitialism

        Substance is buried beneath the libbery. The relevant bit: capitalist conditions have changed. Surveillance capitalism brings new rules distinct from those of industrial or finance capital. I mean we did have massive towers of data driven wealth arise and multiply in very short order. This also means new repression will operate differently from the fascism of the past

        As a LIB Zuboff has fluffy, vibes based ideas on what to do about it, and a very cute belief that the West has meaningful democracy, eg the concept that top level decision making behind closed doors is new

        Disclaimer: I am a babby on theory, open to correction from real vanguard ppl

  • GnastyGnuts [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    Edward Snowden fucked up his life for nothing. Everything he revealed, and people are more scared of a government they don’t live under using their data – which they could already just buy from various US-based companies which take plenty of that data for their own purposes.

  • davel [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s like Snowden & Assange taught these people nothing.

    All the new media literacy pedagogy should be thrown out and replaced with Michael Parenti’s Inventing Reality and Make-Believe Media.

  • LaGG_3 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there an iPhone equivalent of deleting System32 because that’s clearly the answer to this question.

    If anyone is that worried about data privacy, they shouldn’t have a smartphone lol.

  • oregoncom [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    r/privacy is full of the dumbest people I’ve ever met. If you cared about privacy you would never have a smartphone in the first place.

  • Aryuproudomenowdaddy [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    xinternet Oh god oh fuck Xi is in my phone. He made my wallpaper an animated Chinese flag flapping in the breeze and the language preferences looked like they’re being 变成中国人请帮忙我很害怕

  • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    shit is so stupid. i don’t care if the chinese government spies on me. I live in america. It’s DHS, ICE, CIA, FBI that want to kidnap me and harvest my organs. chinese govt can’t do shit to me and have no reason to. honestly i dare them. xi-plz

  • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a google phone right now but I’d love to get a Chinese phone when I need a new one. I’m pretty sure the party isn’t getting transcripts of what I yell at my phone right now, so I’m hoping a Xiaomi or Huawei would be more conducive to sharing my political advice with the chairman

    • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      FWIW Xiaomi and Huawei phones still run android and come with google services installed by default. You have to install a custom OS to avoid that IIRC.

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you want to avoid Google then Huawei is the way to go. Xiaomis generally are Google app compatible out of the box, you just have to go one extra step and install them.

        Huaweis, on the other hand, you have to go through all sorts of steps just to get Google play store installed and working, which I think says a lot about how devoid of google shit they are.

        • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          but I thought Huawei lost access to Google play services years ago?

          You’re probably right. I know a friend’s phone had it but now that I’m thinking about it that’s probably 3-4 years old now.

        • IzyaKatzmann [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They have a sandboxed google play apps through GBox, though many of the apps one would want is on their own app store, App Gallery. Which is open to anyone to use (I have it on a xiaomi for example).

      • IzyaKatzmann [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not completely true. I imported a Xiaomi phone and it did not have Google Play enabled. I changed the region and the option was available for “basic google services”. I did it to have access to banking apps (rather than using online banking, since 2FA is available on the app).

  • cresspacito [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Obviously most apps are stealing your data but people’s reactions to Temu are literally insane. They have a thing where they’ll literally paypal you £20-£40 to refer other users, I was 1 referral away and 2 friends wouldn’t download it because it’s Chinese. Another two friends said that people they know had money stolen by it… like, legality and possibility aside yes, I’m sure Pinduoduo, one of the BIGGEST COMPANIES IN THE WORLD needs to steal your last tenner

    • Omniraptor [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      why would one of the BIGGEST COMPANIES IN THE WORLD need

      You can say the exact same thing about PayPal which is known to ‘misplace’ people’s money and make it extremely difficult to get back. I don’t see how any other fintech company would be different.