• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    The people who create these services will always be more clever and quick to implement workarounds than politicians. It’s a futile battle.

    Want to avoid piracy? Make getting things easier and more convenient.

    Back when Netflix was £5-10 depending on tier, had a load of content, and an account could be shared between a few trusted people, I practically gave up pirating. Now it’s £18 per month for 4K and doesn’t have those other positives going for it, I’ve abandoned it in favour of Radarr+Sonarr+Plex, and am having a better experience.

    For video games, I predominantly buy from Steam, because it’s a good service, and so far I have not seen any evidence that Valve are going to fuck me over. They’ve made gaming and all the things ancillary to it a lot more convenient. So I happily pay. If they embrace enshittification, guess what I’ll do?

    The only games I do pirate are Nintendo/Sega games that haven’t been sold in decades. Why? Because there’s no feasible other way to buy them and keep them!

    I don’t pirate music because Spotify, for all the issues I have with it (and boy do I have a few), still has almost every song I search for, is fairly priced, and hasn’t clamped down on account sharing in the same way Netflix/Disney/etc have. I’m part of a family where we split the cost. All the music I could possibly want for £2.20 per month? Fine by me! If that goes away, I go away, yarr harr.

  • buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is dumb considering that these types of streaming sites are how I actually discover anime and become a fan enough that i want to purchase merch. I pay for Crunchy Roll, but sometimes I want to check out stuff from other services. If I had to rely sheerly on legal services I wouldn’t watch or discover half of what I did.

    Legal services are also pretty inferior. I wanted to watch A certain Scientific Railgun… Season 1 was dubbed, but season 2 on the service wasn’t… I literally had to track it down on some streaming site to get access to what I’m paying for.

  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    There’s a part of me that has become annoyed that i’m forced to pay for a vpn to now access the entirety of the internet. I don’t blame the vpn provider, though. --Nope, they are not the ones I blame…

  • RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    We only pirate TV because it’s easier and cheaper. If you actually had a catch all service (like old Netflix) for a low price, people would stop. Oh wait, we had that but greed got in the way again…

    I used to be perfectly happy with Netflix and Google music + YouTube Red, but corporations were too greedy

    I now use a mix of free Kodi TV, patched YouTube apps, rip music off tidal, and self host media on a lifetime premium Plex server.

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Why just pay one service a small fee for ad free streaming, when you can pay a lot of services a large fee for ad supported streaming?

    • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      As has often been reiterated: piracy is a service problem. If what you get by paying more is an inferior service, then people don’t want to pay for that service.

      • derpgon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        100% true, haven’t pirated a single game since I started using Steam and actually having a paycheck since about 10 years ago

    • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They don’t care. They don’t want to innovate, they want to force you to pay them for nothing in return.

    • jetsetdorito@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I miss my $8 a month google music + YouTube red… I wonder if people got to keep the legacy price for YouTube premium

      • RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I tried Lidarr but I find that it is inconsistent enough that it is just a find-and-grab utility for me.

        I much prefer ripping tidal tracks on my phone using a tidal-dl in termix and then just using a ftp to my Pi when I get home

        • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          FWIW, Lidarr works the worst out of the arr stack for me too. I don’t know if there’s just not enough well indexed material in my sources or what, but yeah, not great.

          If your entire experience with the arr stack has been Lidarr so far, give it another shot! Sonarr and Radarr work absolutely perfectly. It’s just such a nice feeling to open Jellyfin (or I guess Plex) on the TV and go “oh nice new episode is out!”

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It is impossible to ban piracy. The whole concept is that it’s not legal to begin with.

    I bet Lars Ulrich is so proud that he killed music piracy back when he killed napster.

    Except wait…no he didn’t he killed A service. Meaning singular. The concept of piracy moved on. We got limewire and torrents.

    The ONLY thing that has slowed (if not stopped) music piracy is making the content readily and easily available in a convienent consumption method at a reasonable price.

    Shocking, I know.

    The invention of iTunes CHARGING money for music in a (at the time) new more convienent method of music consumption at a reasonable price did leaps and bounds more to destroy piracy than Napsters downfall ever could.

    Now if only video services would learn this lession. Because it’s the same lession. I don’t know how they missed the memo on this.

    Put your video in one centralized place. Make it hassle free to watch. Charge a reasonable price. Piracy dies overnight.

    And just to prove it, show of hands. Who here would go through the effort and risk of pirating, if Netflix had everything you wanted to watch, for $5 a month? Who here would say no, and still pirate? Reply below and tell me if you would still pirate with those conditions?

    But instead, netflix is pushing $20 a month, and the video hosting is fractured among multiple hosts, all of which overcharge, AND want to serve ads.

    Oh hey, right on cue. It’s a skull and bones flag approaching.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Video services involve bigger files, subtitles availability, streaming load less evenly spread over hours.

      But I personally think there are ways involving chunk encryption (one key for many users for the same chunk, but not the same key for everyone ; obviously in the end it’s decrypted and decoded at user’s machine, so opportunity for piracy is not avoidable) and something like bittorrent to make commercial video streaming both convenient for users and not such a technical challenge for distributors.

    • QualifiedKitten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      About 10 years ago, I signed up for a seedbox for torrenting purposes. USD 15/month, which was roughly the same as Netflix at the time. Since then, Netflix has repeatedly raised prices, dropped content, and added ads. On the other hand, I’m still paying $15/month for that seedbox, and they’ve upgraded my storage capacity and bandwidth allotment multiple times.

    • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yep exactly.

      They’ve pushed 6+ services now so it cost that cable used to so people are unsubbing and “cutting the cord” again

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I would still pirate. I like to have the files instead of proprietary apps

      • fangleone2526@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What if they gave you the files, with an easy download button ( with rate limits on downloads per user to avoid mass abuse )? Then, Netflix is basically providing a debrid service, which many people who pirate already pay more than 5$ for. Your VPN for torrenting is likely more than 5$. It’s already trivially easy to rip a movie off a website ( even with DRM ), so this is not a real content control loss for them.

        • daggermoon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          If they offered a service like GOG for movies I think it would be worth it. I don’t have much time for movies though so I actually will buy several films a year on UHD Blu-ray. I only really pirate films that are either out of print or not available in my country on disc.

      • Eyedust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Same tbh. I like having a hard data copy of the things I enjoy, and have pride in my offline music library, which has been neatly filed with all the proper metadata tagged on. Now I can boot up Audacious (Linux) or MusicBee (Windows) and pick the genre I’m feeling that day. Or I can go out for a walk with one of the iPods I’ve restored and leave my phone at home.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I gind it kind of ironic that if the streaming services were federated and your subscription applied proportionally to the services where you watched different shows this problem would solve itself

    • __init__@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Just a subscription that had most of the things and wasn’t a straight up abusive experience would be worth a hell of a lot more than $5. Too bad it will never happen.

    • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I would pay for the sub, but still seed for my friends in poorer countries where $5 USD is a hell of a lot of money.

  • Majorllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Yeah because pirates are notorious for giving up immediately when you make their jobs a little harder.

  • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Make something people want to buy. That will help more.

    EDIT On the anime and manga. Quite a few Japanese companies don’t or refuse to officially release stuff in the west. Most of the ones who do, get fucked with by bad localizers.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s crazy that Netflix originally knew this back in the 2010s. Somehow, over the years, they managed to forget this little nugget of wisdom.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Been sailing the seas since 98. No intention of stopping. One thing I can promise is that you can’t stop it.

    Pirates always…uh…find a way.

    In fact, when streaming services came out and were super affordable, it actually became a bit harder to find pirated movies/shows because people actually opted for the legal option. If the government wants to pull this garbage, it’ll just bring many back into the fold and make it easier for me to sail the seas.

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Sounds like their strategy is to force US companies to block access to piracy sites.

    I already run my torrent client through a non-US VPN so this can literally be bypassed by adding this to my prowlarr docker compose:

    network_mode: service:gluetun

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        gluetun works with any openvpn provider. i prefer proton as ive already got a ton of mail services through them… the vpn is basically a freebie.

      • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I don’t really have a recommendation atm, I used to use mullvad but for torrenting I feel like the lack of port forwarding (once they removed that feature) was hurting my ability to seed so I switched to proton. I also recently added Usenet into my mix and since many providers bundle a VPN subscription - and mine in particular supposedly also supports port forwarding (usenetdirect bundles a ghost path VPN subscription), I’m gonna try to get it to work with that so I don’t have to pay for a VPN separately but I haven’t tried it yet.

    • naticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Thank you, I’ve been using my own docker image that adds in the PIA scripts and creates a Dante SOCKS5 server which works decently but I’d like something a bit more provider agnostic in case I want to change.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I started using pirated software in 1990, back when my first PC was gifted to me. All software I had was copied because I could not afford jack shit on my own. It is thanks to pirated (and open source) software that I have the career I have, and can afford to spend thousands of dollars on legitimate software, music, movies, books, etc.

    Provide product people want and prices they can afford, and they’ll buy them rather than pirate them. Don’t persecute consumers of pirated products and most of them will eventually purchase legally.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I got my first computer, an Apple II, back in the 1980s as a hand-me-down from my (much older) brother when he left for college and I was just 6.

      All but one disk was pirated.

    • Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s like Gabe said (paraphrased): “Piracy is a service problem, not a pricing problem.”

      Make it easy to buy stuff and people will. But the more barriers you put up, the more people will pirate. Granted, there are persons like you (and I counted among those at one point) who cannot afford things from time-to-time, but we’re a minority. Every game I’ve ever pirated from those days I have made sure to purchase once I was able to.

      Make it available for easy purchase and people will buy it.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        I still usually pirate when buying requires jumping through too many hoops. Being in a sanctioned country, ahem, adds some just impractical to go through.

      • Tregetour@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Make it easy to buy stuff and people will.

        In case you haven’t worked it out by now, the following advice may be of help:

        They’re not gonna do that